Skip to main content

Architecting Flexible Organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Flexible Enterprise

Part of the book series: Flexible Systems Management ((FLEXSYS))

Abstract

The twenty-first-century organization is faced with the apparent dilemma of being efficient and innovative, lean and flexible, and hierarchical and flat. The seemingly contradictory characteristics extend into every organizational system, from culture and strategy to process and technology. The flexible organization must embrace and cultivate opposites; indeed, the organization should recognize opposites as opportunities for inventiveness and synthesis and not a dilemma that requires a choice between opposites (Takeuchi and Nonaka 2004). This is in contrast to a more traditional organization that either chooses one principle over its apparent opposite or adopts an engineering perspective that optimizes something between opposites. The knowledge organization, in contrast, synthesizes opposites into something unique and new.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In strict modeling terms, there is a difference between encapsulation and information hiding. The former represents the case where the contract is like a “glass box” – the inner workings are visible to a user – while the latter, the inner workings are not visible and may be thought of as a “black box.” In either case, the user can change neither the inner workings of the contract nor its signature – both (inner workings and signature) collectively represent the design rules necessary for the contract’s modularity.

References

  • Ahl V, Allen TFH (1996) Hierarchy theory: a vision, vocabulary, and epistemology. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadjian CL (2004) Inter-organization knowledge creation: knowledge and networks. In: Takeuchi H, Nonaka I (eds) Hitotsubashi on knowledge management. Wiley, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M (1977) Emergence and the mind. In: Mahner M (ed) Scientific realism. Prometheus Books, Amherst, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (2005) Thinking for a living. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1999) Management challenges for the 21st century. Harper Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill JH (2000) The tacit mode: Michael Polanyi’s postmodern philosophy. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy C (1993) Understanding organizations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay J (1995) Why firms succeed. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilov H (2002) Business models: a guide for business and IT. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilov H, Ross J (1994) Information modeling: an object-oriented approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker JK (2004) The Toyota Way. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil IR, Gudel PJ (2001) Contracts: exchange contracts and relations, 3rd edn. Foundation Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • March JG (Interview by Coutu D) (2006) Ideas as art. Harv Bus Rev 84(10): 82–89, 148

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer B (1992) Applying ‘design by contract’. Comput IEEE 25(10):40–51, October

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1983) Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Morabito J, Singh M (1993) A new approach to object-oriented analysis and design. In: Tools USA 93 (Proceedings of the 11th international conference of object-oriented languages and systems, Santa Barbara) Prentice Hall, pp 45–55, Subsequently accepted as a position paper on object-oriented enterprise modeling by ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC21, Working Group – Conceptual Schema and Data Modeling Facilities. Yokohama

    Google Scholar 

  • Morabito J, Sack I, Bhate A (1999) A organization modeling: innovative architectures for the 21st century. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Morabito J, Sack I, Bhate A (2000) Dimensions of organizational design: the architectural continuum and knowledge binding. Stevens Alliance Technol Manag (SATM), 4(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevis EC, DiBella AJ, Gould JM (1995) Understanding organizations as learning systems. Sloan Manag Rev 36(2):73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno T (1978) Toyota seisan hoshiki. Diamond Inc., Tokyo (Original Japanese Edition), English translation: (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production, Productivity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Osono E (2004) The strategy-making process as dialogue. In: Takeuchi H, Nonaka I (eds) Hitotsubashi on knowledge management. Wiley, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummler GA, Brache AP (1995) Improving performance, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (1980) Organizational psychology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (1992) Organizational culture and leadership, 2nd edn. Jossey Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (1996) Three cultures of management: the key to organizational learning. Sloan Manage Rev 38:9, Fall 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (1999) The corporate culture survival guide. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1973) The organization of complex systems. In: Pattee HH (ed) Hierarchy theory: the challenge of complex systems. George Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1996) The science of the artificial, 3rd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil (2007) Flowing stream strategy and blue ocean strategy: strategic flexibility to manage continuity and change. Lecture given at the Howe School of Technology Management, Stevens Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil (2012) Flowing stream strategy: managing confluence of continuity and change. J Enterp Transform 2(1):26–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi H, Nonaka I (2004) Knowledge creation and dialectics. In: Takeuchi H, Nonaka I (eds) Hitotsubashi on knowledge management. Wiley, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morabito, J., Sack, I., Stohr, E., Bhate, A. (2014). Architecting Flexible Organizations. In: Sushil, Stohr, E.A. (eds) The Flexible Enterprise. Flexible Systems Management. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1560-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics