Abstract
Preserving cells at low temperatures is a complex biotechnological process. In assisted reproductive technology, cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos has been significantly improved by the vitrification technique. Among the myriads of systems, carriers, and methods known and available, vitrification with Cryoptop conquered the world with its consistent and faithfully reproducible results in laboratories of many different countries. Furthermore, the new and advanced “Cryotec method,” with its assurance of achieving a 100 % viability of oocytes and embryos cryopreserved in any stage, is set to revolutionize the cryopreservation techniques worldwide. Cryotec is reported as an open or close device which could eliminate the theoretical possibility of contamination of cells while maintaining an astonishing efficacy of the procedure. The primary disadvantages of slow cooling in cryopreservation of human embryos are the need for an expensive programmable freezing machine and the fact that it is a time-consuming procedure. Vitrification, on the other hand, can be performed without the use of costly equipments, can be completed within minutes, and requires only one trained lab personnel. With the enormous data collected from different groups around the world and the experience gained over the years, we can now affirm that vitrification is a safe, effective, easily repeatable technique which can be applied in various clinical circumstances, thus justifying its use as a routine technique in ART.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boldt J. Current results with slow freezing and vitrification of the human oocyte. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:314–22.
Demant M, Trapphoff T, Fröhlich T, Arnold GJ, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Vitrification at the pre-antral stage transiently alters inner mitochondrial membrane potential but proteome of in vitro grown and matured mouse oocytes appears unaffected. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1096–111.
Monzo C, Haouzi D, Roman K, Assou S, Dechaud H, Hamamah S. Slow freezing and vitrification differentially modify the gene expression profile of human metaphase II oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2160–8.
Rao BS, Mahesh YU, Charan KV, Suman K, Sekhar N, Shivaji S. Effect of vitrification on meiotic maturation and expression of genes in immature goat cumulus oocyte complexes. Cryobiology. 2012;64:176–84.
Gosden R. Cryopreservation: a cold look at technology for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:264–8.
Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:300–8.
Veeck L. Does the developmental stage at freeze impact clinical results post-thaw? Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6:367–74.
Ozmen B, Schultze A, Yousri M. Vitrification of human embryos: which one is the best? Zygot and cleavage and blastocyst stage. J Turk German Gynecol Assoc. 2007;8:218–26.
Martino A, Songsasen N, Leibo SP. Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by rapid cooling. Biol Reprod. 1996;54:1059–69.
Vaita G, Holm P, Kuwayama M. Open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification: a new way to reduce cryo injuries of bovine ova and embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998;51:53–8.
Kong IK, Lee SI, Cho SG. Comparison of open pulled straw (OPS) vs glass micropipette (GMP) vitrification in mouse blastocysts. Theriogenology. 2000;53:1817–26.
Tominaga K, Hamada Y. Gel loading tips as container for vitrification in vitro-produced bovine embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2001;47:227–37.
Chen SU, Lien YR, Cheng YY. Vitrification of mouse oocytes using closed pulled straws (CPS) achieves a high survival and preserve good patterns of meiotic spindles, compared with conventional straws, open pulled straws (OPS) and grids. Hum Reprod. 2001;11:2350–6.
Matsumoto H, Jiang JY, Tanaka T. Vitrification of large quantities of immature bovine oocyte using nylon mesh. Cryobiology. 2001;42:139–44.
Kuleshova LL, Lopata A. Vitrification can be more favourable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:449–54.
Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Effect of carrier system on the yield of human oocytes and embryos as assessed by survival and developmental potential after vitrification. Reproduction. 2002;124:483–9.
Mukaida T, Takahashi K, Kasai M. Blastocyst cryopreservation: ultrarapid using cryoloop technique. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6:221–5.
Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:608–14.
Huang CC, Lee TH, Chen SU. Successful pregnancy following blastocyst cryopreservation using super cooling ultrarapid vitrification. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:122–8.
Gandhi G, Allahbadia G, Kagalwala S, Khatoon A, Hinduja R, Allahbadia A. IVF Lite - A new strategy for managing poor ovarian responders. IVF lite. 2014;1:22–28.
Bielanski A, Nadin-Davis S, Sappi T. Viral contamination of embryos cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology. 2000;40:110–6.
Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T. Vitrification of human blastocysts using cryoloops: clinical outcome of 223 cycles. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:384–91.
Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at −196 C by vitrification. Nature. 1985;313:573–5.
Mukaida T, Wada S, Takahashi K. Vitrification of human embryos based on the assessment of suitable conditions for 8-cell mouse embryos. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2874–9.
Saito H, Ishida GM, Kaneko T. Application of vitrification to human embryo freezing. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2000;49:145–9.
El-Danasouri I, Selman H. Successful pregnancies and deliveries after a simple vitrification protocol for day 3 human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:400–2.
Hredzak R, Ostro A, Zdilova V. Clinical experience with a modified method of human embryo vitrification. Ceska Gynekol. 2005;70:99–103. Slovak.
Wang X, Xiao Z, Yao-qin Q, Da-yong H, Hui-rong S. Outcomes of day 3 embryo transfer with vitrification using Cryoleaf: a 3-year follow-up study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:883–9.
Rama Raju GA, Jaya Prakash G, Murali Krishna K, Madan K. Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers: a preliminary study. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:143–8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.014.
Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, Gardner DK. A randomized controlled study of human day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1976–82. doi:10.1093/humrep/den222.
Al-Hasani S, Ozmen B, Koutlaki N. Three year experience on routine vitrification of human zygote: is it still fair to advocate slow rate freezing? Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:288–93.
Desai N, Blackmon H, Szeptycki J, Goldfarb J. Cryoloop vitrification of human day 3 cleavage-stage embryos: post-vitrification development, pregnancy outcomes and live births. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:208–13.
Zhu GJ, Jin L, Zhang HW. Vitrification of human cleaved embryos in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2005;40:682–4.
Rama Raju GA, Haranath GB, Krishna KM. Vitrification of human 8 cell embryos as a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:434–7.
Isachenko V, Selman H, Isachenko E. Modified vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes: efficacy and effects on ultrastructure. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:211–6.
Gardner DK, Vella P, Lane M. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increase implantation rates and reduce the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:84–8.
Fisch JD, Sher G, Adamowicz M. The graduated embryo score predicts the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies better than a single day 3 evaluation and achieves results associated with blastocyst transfer from day 3 embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1352–8.
Marek D, Langley M, Gardner DK. Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:1035–40.
Vajta G, Nagy Z. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomedicine Online. 2006;12:779–96.
Elnahas A, Alcolak E, Marar E, Elnahas T, Elnahas K, Palapelas V, et al. Vitrification of human oocytes and different development stages of embryos: an overview. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2010;15:2–9.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to MSc Goral Gandhi for her language assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dalvit, G.C. (2015). Vitrification of Day 2–3 Human Embryos Using Various Methods. In: Allahbadia, G., Kuwayama, M., Gandhi, G. (eds) Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1527-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1527-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1526-4
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1527-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)