Skip to main content

Vitrification of Day 2–3 Human Embryos Using Various Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction

Abstract

Preserving cells at low temperatures is a complex biotechnological process. In assisted reproductive technology, cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos has been significantly improved by the vitrification technique. Among the myriads of systems, carriers, and methods known and available, vitrification with Cryoptop conquered the world with its consistent and faithfully reproducible results in laboratories of many different countries. Furthermore, the new and advanced “Cryotec method,” with its assurance of achieving a 100 % viability of oocytes and embryos cryopreserved in any stage, is set to revolutionize the cryopreservation techniques worldwide. Cryotec is reported as an open or close device which could eliminate the theoretical possibility of contamination of cells while maintaining an astonishing efficacy of the procedure. The primary disadvantages of slow cooling in cryopreservation of human embryos are the need for an expensive programmable freezing machine and the fact that it is a time-consuming procedure. Vitrification, on the other hand, can be performed without the use of costly equipments, can be completed within minutes, and requires only one trained lab personnel. With the enormous data collected from different groups around the world and the experience gained over the years, we can now affirm that vitrification is a safe, effective, easily repeatable technique which can be applied in various clinical circumstances, thus justifying its use as a routine technique in ART.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boldt J. Current results with slow freezing and vitrification of the human oocyte. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:314–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Demant M, Trapphoff T, Fröhlich T, Arnold GJ, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Vitrification at the pre-antral stage transiently alters inner mitochondrial membrane potential but proteome of in vitro grown and matured mouse oocytes appears unaffected. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1096–111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Monzo C, Haouzi D, Roman K, Assou S, Dechaud H, Hamamah S. Slow freezing and vitrification differentially modify the gene expression profile of human metaphase II oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2160–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao BS, Mahesh YU, Charan KV, Suman K, Sekhar N, Shivaji S. Effect of vitrification on meiotic maturation and expression of genes in immature goat cumulus oocyte complexes. Cryobiology. 2012;64:176–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gosden R. Cryopreservation: a cold look at technology for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:264–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:300–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Veeck L. Does the developmental stage at freeze impact clinical results post-thaw? Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6:367–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozmen B, Schultze A, Yousri M. Vitrification of human embryos: which one is the best? Zygot and cleavage and blastocyst stage. J Turk German Gynecol Assoc. 2007;8:218–26.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martino A, Songsasen N, Leibo SP. Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by rapid cooling. Biol Reprod. 1996;54:1059–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaita G, Holm P, Kuwayama M. Open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification: a new way to reduce cryo injuries of bovine ova and embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998;51:53–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kong IK, Lee SI, Cho SG. Comparison of open pulled straw (OPS) vs glass micropipette (GMP) vitrification in mouse blastocysts. Theriogenology. 2000;53:1817–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tominaga K, Hamada Y. Gel loading tips as container for vitrification in vitro-produced bovine embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2001;47:227–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen SU, Lien YR, Cheng YY. Vitrification of mouse oocytes using closed pulled straws (CPS) achieves a high survival and preserve good patterns of meiotic spindles, compared with conventional straws, open pulled straws (OPS) and grids. Hum Reprod. 2001;11:2350–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matsumoto H, Jiang JY, Tanaka T. Vitrification of large quantities of immature bovine oocyte using nylon mesh. Cryobiology. 2001;42:139–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuleshova LL, Lopata A. Vitrification can be more favourable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:449–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Effect of carrier system on the yield of human oocytes and embryos as assessed by survival and developmental potential after vitrification. Reproduction. 2002;124:483–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mukaida T, Takahashi K, Kasai M. Blastocyst cryopreservation: ultrarapid using cryoloop technique. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6:221–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:608–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang CC, Lee TH, Chen SU. Successful pregnancy following blastocyst cryopreservation using super cooling ultrarapid vitrification. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:122–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gandhi G, Allahbadia G, Kagalwala S, Khatoon A, Hinduja R, Allahbadia A. IVF Lite - A new strategy for managing poor ovarian responders. IVF lite. 2014;1:22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bielanski A, Nadin-Davis S, Sappi T. Viral contamination of embryos cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology. 2000;40:110–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T. Vitrification of human blastocysts using cryoloops: clinical outcome of 223 cycles. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:384–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at −196 C by vitrification. Nature. 1985;313:573–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mukaida T, Wada S, Takahashi K. Vitrification of human embryos based on the assessment of suitable conditions for 8-cell mouse embryos. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2874–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saito H, Ishida GM, Kaneko T. Application of vitrification to human embryo freezing. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2000;49:145–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. El-Danasouri I, Selman H. Successful pregnancies and deliveries after a simple vitrification protocol for day 3 human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:400–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hredzak R, Ostro A, Zdilova V. Clinical experience with a modified method of human embryo vitrification. Ceska Gynekol. 2005;70:99–103. Slovak.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X, Xiao Z, Yao-qin Q, Da-yong H, Hui-rong S. Outcomes of day 3 embryo transfer with vitrification using Cryoleaf: a 3-year follow-up study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:883–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rama Raju GA, Jaya Prakash G, Murali Krishna K, Madan K. Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers: a preliminary study. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:143–8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, Gardner DK. A randomized controlled study of human day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1976–82. doi:10.1093/humrep/den222.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Al-Hasani S, Ozmen B, Koutlaki N. Three year experience on routine vitrification of human zygote: is it still fair to advocate slow rate freezing? Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:288–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Desai N, Blackmon H, Szeptycki J, Goldfarb J. Cryoloop vitrification of human day 3 cleavage-stage embryos: post-vitrification development, pregnancy outcomes and live births. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:208–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu GJ, Jin L, Zhang HW. Vitrification of human cleaved embryos in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2005;40:682–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rama Raju GA, Haranath GB, Krishna KM. Vitrification of human 8 cell embryos as a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:434–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Isachenko V, Selman H, Isachenko E. Modified vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes: efficacy and effects on ultrastructure. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:211–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gardner DK, Vella P, Lane M. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increase implantation rates and reduce the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:84–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fisch JD, Sher G, Adamowicz M. The graduated embryo score predicts the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies better than a single day 3 evaluation and achieves results associated with blastocyst transfer from day 3 embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1352–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Marek D, Langley M, Gardner DK. Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:1035–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vajta G, Nagy Z. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomedicine Online. 2006;12:779–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Elnahas A, Alcolak E, Marar E, Elnahas T, Elnahas K, Palapelas V, et al. Vitrification of human oocytes and different development stages of embryos: an overview. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2010;15:2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to MSc Goral Gandhi for her language assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Carlos Dalvit DVM, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dalvit, G.C. (2015). Vitrification of Day 2–3 Human Embryos Using Various Methods. In: Allahbadia, G., Kuwayama, M., Gandhi, G. (eds) Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1527-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1527-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1526-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1527-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics