Abstract
Fertility is one of the medical areas having a very rapid evolution. This chapter is about the history and evolution of cryoprotectants and vitrification. The beginnings of cryopreservation, dating from the early eighteenth century to date, are described in detail. The history of cryopreservation has evolved from the plant cells in the beginning to animals, vitrified germ cells, embryos, oocytes, and to even other tissues to be used for transplantation.
This process has not been easy. It is not enough to know that a cell can survive after being frozen to −286 °C. It is important to ensure that the least possible damage is done to the cell during this process. This chapter offers a revision from the first steps of cryopreservation to what we know today as the ultrarapid vitrification method, which lasts a few seconds, achieving rates of freezing up to −23,000 °C/min using permeating and nonpermeating cryoprotectants, in order to avoid damage to the cell structure by the formation of ice crystals within. This chapter mentions the latest technologies and techniques available for the vitrification nowadays, as well as the objectives and forward-looking in vitrification area.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kuleshova LL, Lopata Alex MB. Vitrification can be more favorable tan slow cooling. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(3):449–54.
Leibo S, Pool TB. The principal variables of cryopreservation: solutions, temperatures and change rates. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):269–76.
Liebermann J. Chapter 6. Vitrification of oocytes and embryos. In: Current frontiers in criobiology. Chicago: Fertility Centers of Illinois; 2012. p. 169–84.
Fuller B. Cryoprotectants: the essential antifreezes to protect life in the frozen state. Cryo Letters. 2004;25(6):375–88.
Maximov NA. Berichte der Deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft. 1912;30:52–65.
Cobo A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Domingo J, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Is vitrification of oocytes useful for fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline and in cancer patients? Fertil Steril. 2013;99(6):1485–95.
Chang MC. Transplantation of fertilized rabbit ova: the effect on viability of age, in vitro storage period & storage temperature. Nature. 1948;161:978.
Polge C, Smith AU, Parkes AS. Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification & dehydration at low temperatures. Nature. 1949;164:666.
Wennerholm UB. Cryopreservation of embryos and oocytes: obstetric outcome and health in children. Hum Reprod. 2000;15 Suppl 5:18–25.
Ludwig M, Al-Hasani S, Ferlberbaum R, Diedrich K. New aspects of cryopreservation of oocytes ad embryos in assisted reproduction and future perspectives. Hum Reprod. 1999;14 Suppl 1:162–85.
Garcia JI, Noriega-Portella L, Noriega-Hoces L. Efficacy of oocyte vitrification combined with blastocyst stage transfer in an egg donation program. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(4):782–90.
Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Kato Ladies Clinic. Tokyo Japan. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(5). [Internet]. Available from: www.rbmonline.com/Article/1925. Accessed Sept 2005.
Jain JK, Paulson RJ. Oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2006;86 Suppl 3:1037–46.
Courtney BS, Lane M, Gardner DK. The Cryoloop facilitates re-vitrification of embryos at four successive stages of development without impairing embryo growth. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(11):2978–84.
Chen SU, Lien YR, Chen Y, Chen HF, Ho HN, Yang Y. Vitrification of mouse oocytes using closed pulled straws (CPS) achieves a high survival and preserves good patterns of meiotic spindles, compared with conventional straws, open pulled straws (OPS) and grids. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2350–6.
Chian RC, Wang Y, Li Y. Oocyte vitrification: advances, progress and future goals. Technological innovations. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(4):411–20.
Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Kasai M, Takahashi K. Successful birth after transfer of vitrified human blastocysts with use of a cryoloop containerless technique. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(3):618–20.
Criado SE. Chapter 6. The problem of contamination: open vs. closed vs semi-closed vitrification system. In: Current frontiers in cryopreservation. Marbella: CERAM: Centre of Assisted Reproduction; 2012. p. 105–36.
Keros V, Xella S, Hultenby K, Pettersson K, Sheikhi M, Volpe A, et al. Vitrification versus controlled-rate freezing in cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(7):1670–83.
Kuwayama M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. Theriogenology. 2007;67(1):73–80.
Chang CC. Method for microdrop vitrification of cells. Livestock Research Institute; 2006.
Xing W, Zhou C, Bian J, Montag M, Xu Y, Li Y, et al. Solid surface vitrification is an appropriate and convenient method for cryopreservation of isolated rat follicles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:42. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-8-42.
Gandhi G, Allahbadia G, Kagalwala S, Allahbadia A, Ramesh S, Patel K, et al. ACCU-VIT: a new strategy for managing poor responders. London: e-poster ESHRE; 2013.
Kagalwala S, Gandhi G, Allahbadia G, Kuwayama M, Allahbadia A, Chipkar V, et al. A comparison of two different vitrification methods for cryopreservation of mature human oocytes. London: e-poster ESHRE; 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Castellon, L.A.R., Loya, A.G.C. (2015). Vitrification Solutions: Historical Development. In: Allahbadia, G., Kuwayama, M., Gandhi, G. (eds) Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1527-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1527-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1526-4
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1527-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)