Skip to main content

Population Size and Composition of Sample Households

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Paying Out-of-Pocket for Drugs, Diagnostics and Medical Services

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

  • 640 Accesses

Abstract

Characteristically, perhaps there may not be too many commonalities to make the three underlying states—UP, Rajasthan and Delhi—mutually comparable. Among the few that make them to a certain extent comparable is that each of these states belongs mostly to the northern belt of the country and they largely remain monolingual with Hindi as the dominant language of daily usage. In most other cases, all the three states are mutually far apart with Delhi being the smallest in terms of population size and UP the largest. Compared to UP and Rajasthan, Delhi provides much better socio-economic opportunities to its residents and has a considerably higher per capita income with better access to medical and public health-care services. These interstate differences are expected to embody the socio-economic and health conditions of individuals and households described in the rest of this or in subsequent chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For interesting discussions on some of these issues, see Rodgers (2007), Chakravarty and Mitra (2009), Carr and Chen (2004), and RoyChowdhury (2007), etc.

References

  • Carr, M., & Chen, M. (2004). Globalization, social exclusion and work: with special reference to informal employment. World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization, Background Paper (Policy Integration Department Working Paper No. 20). Geneva: International Labour Organization (ILO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S., & Mitra, A. (2009). Is industry still the engine of growth? An econometric study of the organized sector employment in India. Journal of Policy Modelling, 35, 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Family Health Survey (2005–2006). (2007, September). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) (Vol. 1, p. 23). International Institute for Population Sciences (Mumbai) and Macro International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, G. (2007). Decent work, social inclusion and development. Indian Journal of Human Development, 1, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • RoyChowdhury, S. (2007). Informality in globalized from of production. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 50(4), 765–774.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2.A.1 Distribution of sample populations in Delhi: slum and non-slum households

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alam, M. (2013). Population Size and Composition of Sample Households. In: Paying Out-of-Pocket for Drugs, Diagnostics and Medical Services. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1281-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics