Skip to main content

Streptomyces sp.VSMGT1014-Mediated Antifungal Activity Against Fungal Plant Pathogens

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Prospects in Bioscience: Addressing the Issues

Abstract

Presently actinomycetes from rice rhizosphere are screened for novel bioactive secondary metabolites and for biocontrol potential against fungal plant pathogens. A total of 102 actinomycetes were isolated from rice rhizosphere soils collected from Tamil Nadu, India. All the isolates were screened against sheath blight pathogen Rhizoctonia solani by dual culture method with inhibition zone range from 0.6 to 3.0 cm. Among 102, 56 have shown the antagonistic activity against R. solani. Due to superior biocontrol activity against fungal pathogens over the other actinomycetes, an efficient strain VSMGT1014 was selected and identified as Streptomyces sp. based on the biochemical and atomic force microscope observation. The culture filtrate of Streptomyces sp. VSMGT1014 remarkably inhibited the mycelial growth and conidial and sclerotial germination of many fungal pathogens such as Macrophomina phaseolina, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium udum, and Alternaria alternata. The strain Streptomyces sp.VSMGT1014 produced five different compounds with Rf value ranges: 0.46, 0.51, 0.61, 0.85, and 0.89. Ethyl acetate extract of crude metabolite from VSMGT1014 significantly inhibited the mycelia growth of most of the fungal pathogens as well as sclerotial germination of R. solani.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bashan Y. Azospirillum plant growth promoting strains are non-pathogenic on tomato, pepper, cotton, and wheat. Can J Microbiol. 1998;44:168–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown AE, Surgeoner R. Enhancement of plant growth by Zygorrhynchus moelleri. Ann Appl Biol. 1991;118:39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burr TJ, Schroth MN, Suslow T. Increased potato yields by treatment of seed species with spécific strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens and P. putida. Phytopathology. 1978;68:1377–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. KIoepper JW, Leong J, Teintze M, Schroth MN. Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Nature. 1980;286:885–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. KIoepper JW, Schroth MN, Miller TD. Effects of rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on potato plant development and yield. Phytopathology. 1980;70:1078–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. KIoepper JW, Lifshitz R, Zablotowicz RM. Free-living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity. Trends Biotechnol. 1989;7:39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Turner JT, Backman PA. Factors relating to peanut yield increases after seed treatment with Bacillus subtilis. Plant Dis. 1991;75:347–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Behal V. Bioactive products from Streptomyces. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2000;47:113–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox GE, Stackebrandt E. The application of 16S rRNA cataloguing and 5S rRNA sequencing in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol. 1987;19:405–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodfellow M, Cross T. Classification. The biology of actinomycetes. London: Academic; 1984. p. 7–164.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goodfellow M, Ferguson EV, Sanglier JJ. Numerical classification and identification of Streptomyces species- a review. Gene. 1992;115:225–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stackebrandt E, Woese CR. Towards a phylogeny of the actinomycetes and related organisms. Curr Microbiol. 1981;5:197–220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Crawford DL, Lynch JM, Whipps JM, Ousley MA. Isolation and characterization of actinomycete antagonists of a fungal root pathogen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:3899–905.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Franklin TJ, Snow GA, Barrett-Bee KJ, Nolan RD. Antifungal, antiprotozoal and antiviral agents. In: Franklin TJ, Snow GA, Barrett-Bee KJ, Nolan RD, editors. Biochemistry of antimicrobial action. 4th ed. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1989. p. 137–61.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Lechevalier HA, Waksman SA. The actinomycetes. III. Antibiotics of actinomycetes. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1962. 430.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1966;16:313–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang MC, Hoes JA. Penetration and infection of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by Coniothyrium minitans. Can J Bot. 1976;54:406–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carrera LM, Buyer JS, Vinyard B, Abdul-Baki AA, Sikora LJ, Teasdale JR. Effects of cover crops, compost and manure amendments on soil microbial community structure in tomato production systems. Appl Soil Ecol. 2007;37:247–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams ST, et al., editors. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. 9th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shanmugaiah V, Mathivanan N, Varghese B. Purification, crystal structure and ntimicrobial activity of phenazine-1-carboxamide produced by a growth-promoting biocontrol bacterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa MML2212. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;108:703–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Colins JE, Chafik Z. Comparison of biological and chemical treatments for control of bacterial speck of tomato under field conditions in Morocco. Plant Dis. 1986;70:1048–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shanmuganathan K, Yasin J, Jayaprakasam M. Antibiotics in agriculture. Agric Today. 2001;6:40–1.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Malarvizhi K, Mathivanan N. Biodiversity and antimicrobial activity of soil actinomycetes. Abstract of the National Conference on Emerging Trends in Mycology, Plant Pathology and Microbial Biotechnology. Osmania University, Hyderabad, India; 2004. 29–31 Dec 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  24. NHMRC. Antibiotics in agronomy and horticulture. National Health and Medical Council, Commonwealth of Australia. Page content last modified: 5 Feb 2001, URL: http://www.nhmrc.health.gov.au/publicat/fullhtml/dp15-p2.html

  25. Yamaguchi I. Pesticides of microbial origin and applications of molecular biology. In: Copping LG, editor. Crop protection agents from nature: natural products and analogues. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 1996. p. 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors greatly acknowledge the Head, Department of Microbial Technology; the Coordinator, NRCBS; and the Chairperson, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Shanmugaiah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harikrishnan, H., Shanmugaiah, V. (2012). Streptomyces sp.VSMGT1014-Mediated Antifungal Activity Against Fungal Plant Pathogens. In: Sabu, A., Augustine, A. (eds) Prospects in Bioscience: Addressing the Issues. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0810-5_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics