Skip to main content

Market Fluctuations and Country Risk Relationships for Australian and Indian Energy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recession and Its Aftermath

Abstract

Indians and Australians have a great deal more in common than a love of the game of cricket. A recent Australia–India energy and minerals forum (Australian Ministry for Foreign Affairs and Trade 2010) acknowledged that there exists a mutual respect for democracy and the rule of law. In both countries pluralism and human rights are important social objectives. Australia and India are cooperating increasingly on matters relating to trade and investment, international security, climate change, science and education, but also in the areas of resources and energy. The forum made the point that India is soon to become Australia’s third largest export market, after China and Japan (e.g., two-way trade between India and Australia had grown to 22 billion dollars in 2008–2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bombay Stock Exchange (2010).

  2. 2.

    Australian Stock Exchange (2010).

  3. 3.

    Australian Stock Exchange (2010).

  4. 4.

    Chikkatur et al. (2009).

  5. 5.

    IBEF (2010).

  6. 6.

    Australian Foreign Direct Investment Flows (2010).

  7. 7.

    Sovereign risk rating downgrades are informative to equity markets, but upgrades do not supply markets with new information.

  8. 8.

    Country risk measures are correlated with future equity returns but financial risk measures reflect greater information. They also found that country risk measures are also highly correlated with country equity valuation measures and that country equity value oriented strategies generated higher returns.

  9. 9.

    Country risk represents a more important determinant of stock returns in emerging markets rather than in developed markets. They also found that over the past 10 years country risk had decreased in emerging markets and increased in developed markets. They speculated that if that trend continued, the differential impacts of country risks in each of those markets would narrow.

  10. 10.

    They concluded that multi-index models should be tested that incorporate a regional index, an economic development attribute, commodity factors, and a political risk variable in order to more effectively price securities.

  11. 11.

    Equity market responses to country/sovereign risk rating changes revealed significant responses following downgrades.

  12. 12.

    Government stability, the absence of internal conflicts and ethnic tensions, basic democratic rights, and the ensuring of law and order are highly significant determinants of foreign investment flows.

  13. 13.

    Vector autoregressive (VAR) models are specified so that VAR-based tests of co integration can be examined.

  14. 14.

    VAR models with VAR-based Johansen cointegration tests (Johansen 1988) and causality tests (Granger 1988) and variance decomposition.

References

  • Australian Foreign Direct Investment Flows. (2010). http;?business.nsw.gov.au/aboutnsw/Trade+and+Investment/B7_foreign_dir_on

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Ministry for Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2010). http://foreignminister.gov.au/speeches/2010/10067_australia-india-forum.html

  • Australian Stock Exchange. (2010). http://www.asx.com.au/about/asx/index.htm

  • Bombay Stock Exchange. (2010). http://www.bseindia.com/about/introbse.asp

  • Brooks, R., Faff, R., Hillier, D., & Hillier, J. (2004). The national market impact of sovereign rating changes. Journal of Energy and Finance, 28(1), 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, M., & Hefeker, C. (2005). Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment (HWWA Discussion Paper 315).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chikkatur, A. P., Sagar, A. D., & Sankar, T. L. (2009). Sustainable development of the Indian coal sector. Energy, 34(8), 942–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CountryRisk.com. (2010). http://www.countryrisk.com/about/archives/000204.html

  • Diamonte, R., Liew, J. M., & Stevens, R. L. (1996). Political risk in emerging and developed markets. Financial Analysts Journal, 52(3), 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series within a unit root. Econometrica, 49, 1022–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erb, C. B., Harvey, C. R., & Viskanta, T. E. (1996). Political risk, economic risk and financial risk (Fuqua School of Business Working Paper: 9606). Cambridge: Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J. (1988). Some recent developments in a concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39, 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, J., Holthausen, R., & Leftwich, R. (1992). The effect of bond rating agency announcements on bond and stock prices. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 733–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holthausen, R., & Leftwich, R. (1986). The effect of bond rating changes on common stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(1), 57–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, V., & Heaney, R. (2001). Regionalism, political risk and capital market segmentation in international asset pricing. AFA New Orleans Meetings.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBEF. (2010). Foreign direct investment http://www.ibef.org/economy/fdi.aspx

  • ICRG. (2010). International country risk guide. Political Risk Services Group. http://www.icrgonline.com?page.aspx?=icrgmethods

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltosky, Z., & Lianto, T. (1995). The incremental information content of bond rating revisions: The Australian evidence. Journal of Energy and Finance, 19(5), 891–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, F. K., & Brown, K. C. (2003). Investment analysis and portfolio management (pp. 176–285). Ohio: Thomson South Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reineberg, H. H. (2006). India’s electricity sector in transition: Can its giant goals be met? The Electricity Journal, 19(1), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1977). A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(2), 129–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory, 13(2), 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. K., & Vohra, E. (2008). Foreign direct investment in the electricity sector: The Indian perspective. The Electricity Journal, 21(7), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. L. (2007). Expert political risk opinions and banking system returns: A revised banking market model. The International Journal of Business and Management, 2(5), 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Simpson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Augmented Dickey–Fuller unit root test results for price data and first differences of price data (Dickey and Fuller 1981)

Variable

Level seriest statistics

First difference series t statistics

Australian energy sector price index

−0.7977

−9.4313*

Indian energy sector price index

−1.4370

−10.6678*

Economic risk rating: Australia

−1.3246

−11.5675*

Financial risk rating: Australia

−1.9890

−10.0720*

Political risk rating: Australia

−3.4042**

−11.8873*

Economic risk rating: India

−2.9588**

−10.3904*

Financial risk rating: India

−2.2075

−8.9656*

Political risk rating: India

−2.3370

−12.2086*

Australian stock exchange price index

−1.3375

−7.0473*

Indian stock exchange price index

−0.8238

−8.7795*

  1. Critical values for augmented Dickey–Fuller unit root tests are −3.4950 at the 1% significance level (*), −2.8898 at the 5% significance level (**), and −2.5819 at the 10% significance level

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India Pvt. Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simpson, J. (2013). Market Fluctuations and Country Risk Relationships for Australian and Indian Energy. In: Verma, N. (eds) Recession and Its Aftermath. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0532-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics