Skip to main content

Valve-Sparing Operation Versus Bentall Operation: Comparison at Medium-Term Follow-Up

  • Conference paper
Cardio-aortic and Aortic Surgery

Summary

The valve-sparing operation has been proposed for aortic regurgitation (AR) in the setting of aortic root dilatation. This method has several advantages over the Bentall operation. Since 1994 a total of 37 patients have undergone either reimplantation of the aortic valve (12 patients) or remodeling of the aortic root (25 patients) in our institution (group R). During the same period 33 patients have had the Bentall operation (group B) as elective surgery. The mean follow-up periods were 323 days (17–1457 days) in group A and 712 days (15–1620 days) in group B. In group R seven patients had Marfan syndrome, five had aortic dissection, and three had aortitis syndrome. In group B nine patients had Marfan syndrome, two had aortic dissection, and eight had aortitis syndrome. There were no differences in preoperative New York Heart Association class or age at operation between the two groups. There was one hospital death in each group and one late death in group B. Two patients in group R required reoperation but none in group B. Actuarial survivals at 4 years were 96.7% in group R and 94.0% in group B. The event-free rates at 4 years were 94.6% in group R and 93.9% in group B. The reoperation-free rates at 4 years were 94.6% in group R and 100% in group B. There was no statistical difference between the two groups for all rates. The valve-sparing operation maintains valve competence during the early postoperative course in our experience, but follow-up data showed deterioration of the valve competence after reimplantation or remodeling, particularly when aortic regurgitation, even mild, was seen after operation. The medium-term survival and cardiac event rates for the valve-sparing operation showed no statistical difference from those of the Bentall operation, although the long-term results of valve competence after the valve-sparing operation are still not known. The aortic root replacement technique should be selected in each clinical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ergin MA, Spielvogel D, Apaydin A, Lansman SL, McCullough JN, Galla JD, Griepp RB (1999) Surgical treatment of the dilated ascending aorta: when and how? Ann Thorac Surg 67:1834–1839, discussion 1853–1856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. David TE, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Webb GD (1999) Aortic valve sparing operations: an update. Ann Thorac Surg 67:1840–1842, discussion 1853–1856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yacoub MH, Gehle P, Chandrasekaran V, Birks EJ, Child A, Radley-Smith R (1998) Late results of a valve-preserving operation in patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta and root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:1080–1090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luciani GB, Casali G, Tomezzoli A, Mazzucco A (1999) Recurrence of aortic insufficiency after aortic root remodeling with valve preservation. Ann Thorac Surg 67:1849–1852, discussion 1853–1856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harringer W, Pethig K, Hagl C, Wahlers T, Cremer J, Haverich A (1999) Replacement of ascending aorta with aortic valve reimplantation: midterm results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:803–807, discussion 807–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. David TE, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Webb GD (1999) Aortic valve sparing operations: an update. Ann Thorac Surg 67:1840–1842, discussion 1853–1856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mingke D, Dresler C, Pethig K, Heinemann M, Borst HG (1998) Surgical treatment of Marfan patients with aneurysms and dissection of the proximal aorta. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 39:65–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. David T (1997) Current practice in Marfan’s aortic root surgery: reconstruction with aortic valve preservation or replacement? What to do with the mitral valve? J Card Surg 12(2 suppl):147–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gott VL, Laschinger JC, Cameron DE, Dietz HC, Greene PS, Gillinov AM, Pyeritz RE, Alejo DE, Fleischer KJ, Anhalt GJ, Stone CD, McKusick VA (1996) The Marfan syndrome and the cardiovascular surgeon. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 10:149–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Minatoya, K. et al. (2001). Valve-Sparing Operation Versus Bentall Operation: Comparison at Medium-Term Follow-Up. In: Kawada, S., Ueda, T., Shimizu, H. (eds) Cardio-aortic and Aortic Surgery. Keio University International Symposia for Life Sciences and Medicine, vol 7. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-65934-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-65934-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-65936-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-65934-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics