Skip to main content

Quantitative Analysis of Conflict Between Aircraft by Using Radar Track Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Air Traffic Management and Systems II

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 420))

  • 803 Accesses

Abstract

As the demand for air traffic increases, new air traffic management systems are needed. In the system, it is expressly necessary to avoid conflict between aircraft. Efficient methods to prevent conflict are currently based on the expertise of air traffic controllers. Hence, a two-step analysis method is described in this study. First, it is shown using a proposed method with en route radar track data that no conflicts occurred in the airspace over Japan during the period in question. Second, instructions provided to pilots by the air traffic controllers to solve conflicts are estimated from the same radar data, and the results allow some groups to be rearranged in terms of avoidance procedures. These results will be useful references when developing an automated system of conflict detection and resolution in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The Boeing Company: Current Market Outlook 2013-2032. https://www.iaa.ie/docs/default-source/misc/boeing_current_market_outlook_20131.pdf. Accessed 06 September 2016

  2. Study Group for the Future Air Traffic Systems: Long Term Vision for the Future Air Traffic Systems, CARATS Collaborative Actions for renovation of Air Traffic Systems. http://www.mlit.go.jp/common/000128185.pdf. Accessed 06 September 2016

  3. Paielli, R. A.: Tactical Conflict Resolution Using Vertical Maneuvers En Route Airspace. J. Aircraft, 45, 6 (2008), p.2111-2119.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paielli, R. A., “Evaluation of Tactical Conflict Resolution Algorithms for Enroute Airspace”, J. Aircraft, 48, 1, 324–330 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Miyazawa, N. K. Wickramasinghe, A. Harada and Y. Miyamoto: Dynamic Programming Application to Airliner Four Dimensional Optimal Flight Trajectory. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference, August 19–22 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Miyamoto, N. K. Wickramasinghe, A. Harada, Y. Miyazawa and K. Funabiki: Analysis of Fuel-Efficient Airliner Flight via Dynamic Programming Trajectory Optimization. Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan, Vol. 11, 93–98 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N.K. Wickramasinghe, Y. Miyamoto, A. Harada, T. Kozuka, S. Shigetomi, Y. Miyazawa, M. Brown and Y. Fukuda: Flight Trajectory Optimization for Operational Performance Analysis of Jet Passenger Aircraft. Trans. JSASS Aerospace Technology Japan, 12, APISAT2013, a17–a25 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Miyazawa, H. Matsuda, S. Shigetomi, A. Harada and T. Kozuka: Potential Benefits of Arrival Time Assignment, Dynamic Programming Trajectory Optimization applied to the Tokyo International Airport. Eleventh USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, ATM2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Fukuoka, N. Takeichi and Y. Nakamura: Conflict Avoidance Using Flight Speed Control in a High Density Air Corridor. (in Japanese), Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan, Vol. 61, No.5, 119–124 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Kozuka, Y. Miyazawa, N.K. Wickramasinghe, M. Brown and Y. Fukuda: A Study on Estimation of Aircraft Interference Resolution Procedure by Surveillance-Derived Flight Trajectory. (in Japanese), Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan, Vol. 14, 77–83 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Shigetomi, T. Kozuka, Y. Higuchi, K. Yoda and Y. Miyazawa: Evaluation of CARATS Open Data Accuracy. (in Japanese), Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan, Vol 15, 15–21 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. EUROCONTROL: EUROCONTROL Guidance Material for Short Term Conflict Alert Appendix A: Reference STCA System. https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/field_tabs/content/documents/nm/safety/appendix-a-reference-stca-system.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoyuki Kozuka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Japan KK

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kozuka, T., Miyazawa, Y. (2017). Quantitative Analysis of Conflict Between Aircraft by Using Radar Track Data. In: Electronic Navigation Research Institute (eds) Air Traffic Management and Systems II. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 420. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56423-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56423-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-56421-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-56423-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics