Skip to main content

Avoidance of Sperm Competition in Males

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sperm Competition in Butterflies

Part of the book series: Ecological Research Monographs ((ECOLOGICAL))

Abstract

Although courtship displays differ between species, virgin females of any species seem to accept copulation easily whenever certain aspects of male performance are adequate. On the other hand, mated females frequently show the open-winged posture and raised abdomen stance to prevent access to courting males (Fig. 6.1). Many studies have clarified the significance of mate choice of mated females during mate-locating behaviour, with detection of male qualities such as age and size. After acceptance by the mated females, the males succeed in copulating but eventually encounter the severe problem that their mates have already stored enough sperm from previous males for fertilisation. Transferred sperm have to compete with the sperm of previous males inside the female reproductive organs. Because the sex ratio is around unity with female polyandry, the probability of encounter with already mated females must be high. Therefore, males might have to develop not a morphological but a behavioural or physiological device to avoid or to win the sperm competition. Sperm migration inside the female reproductive organs after copulation suggests that apyrene sperm may intercept the movement of the eupyrene sperm of the previous mated males. On the other hand, sperm always have a certain risk for competition with future males that will be accepted by the females. To inhibit insemination by the sperm of future males, a spermatophore mass is the only male tactic to delay copulation of the mated females. Consequently, strategic ejaculation by males might be evolved for rival and future males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bissoondath CJ, Wiklund C (1997) Effect of male body size on sperm precedence in the polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi L. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Behav Ecol 8:518–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs CL, Gilbert LE (1979) Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating. Science 206:83–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs CL, Watt WB (1981) Population structure of pierid butterflies. IV. Genetic and physiological investment in offspring by male Colias. Oecologia (Berl) 50:320–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook PA, Gage MJG (1995) Effects of risks of sperm competition on the numbers of eupyrene and apyrene sperm ejaculated by moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook PA, Wedell N (1996) Ejaculate dynamics in butterflies: a strategy for maximizing fertilization success? Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1047–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook PA, Wedell N (1999) Non-fertile sperm delay female remating. Nature (Lond) 397:486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordero A (1990) The adaptive significance of the prolonged copulations of the damselfly, Ischnura graellsii (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Anim Behav 40:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curril IM, LaMunyon CW (2006) Sperm storage and arrangement within females of the arctiid moth Utetheisa ornatrix. J Insect Physiol 52:1182–1188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson JL, Rutowski RL (1989) The function of the mating plug in the chalcedon checkerspot butterfly. Anim Behav 38:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L, Reinhold K (2007) Sperm competition games: optimal sperm allocation in response to the size of competing ejaculates. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferkau C, Fischer K (2006) Costs of reproduction in male Bicyclus anynana and Pieris napi butterflies: effects of mating history and food limitation. Ethology 112:1117–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage AR, Barnard CJ (1996) Male crickets increase sperm number in relation to competition and female size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (2008) Sexual conflict over nuptial gifts in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 53:83–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harshman LG, Prout T (1994) Sperm displacement without sperm transfer in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 48:758–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiroyoshi S (1995) Regulation of sperm quantity transferring to females at mating in the adult male of Polygonia c-aureum (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Appl Entomol Zool 30:111–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiroyoshi S, Mitsuhashi J (1999) Sperm reflux and its role in multiple mating in males of a butterfly Polygonia c-aureum Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J Insect Physiol 45:107–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaMunyon CW (2000) Sperm storage by females of the polyandrous noctuid moth Heliothis virescens. Anim Behav 59:395–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaMunyon CW, Ward S (1998) Larger sperm outcompete smaller sperm in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 266:263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis Z, Wedell N (2009) Male moths reduce sperm investment in relatives. Anim Behav 77:1547–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser KS (1989) Effects of spermatophores on male and female monarch butterfly reproductive success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1982) Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes. J Theor Biol 96:281–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Ball MA, Stockley P, Gage MJG (1996) Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1291–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Ball MA, Stockley P, Gage MJG (1997) Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1793–1802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitnick S, Markow TA (1994) Male gametic strategies: sperm size, testes size, and the allocation of ejaculate among successive mates by the sperm-limited fly Drosophila pachea and its relatives. Am Nat 143:785–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold K, Kurtz J, Engqvist L (2002) Cryptic male choice: sperm allocation strategies when female quality varies. J Evol Biol 15:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki N, Watanabe M (2015) Alternative ejaculate allocation tactics in relation to male mating history of the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J Res Lepid 48:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki N, Todoriki S, Watanabe M (2015) Effect of sperm ejection by females on male fertilization success in the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J Res Lepid 48:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro AM (1970) The role of sexual behavior in density-related dispersal of pierid butterflies. Am Nat 104:367–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Siva-Jothy MT (1998) Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic, San Diego, pp 341–434

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara T (1979) Stretch reception in the bursa copulatrix of the butterfly, Pieris rapae crucivora, and its role in behaviour. J Comp Physiol 130:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschudi-Rein K, Benz G (1990) Mechanisms of sperm transfer in female Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:1158–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waage JK (1979) Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203:916–918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M (1988) Multiple matings increase the fecundity of the yellow swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus L., in summer generations. J Insect Behav 1:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Hachisuka A (2005) Dynamics of eupyrene and apyrene sperm storage in ovipositing females of the swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Entomol Sci 8:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Hirota M (1999) Effects of sucrose intake on spermatophore mass produced by male swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus L. Zool Sci 16:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Kobayashi T (2006) Total sperm ejaculation in monandrous (Papilio machaon) and polyandrous (P. xuthus) swallowtail butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) restricted to larval stage-derived nutrients. J Res Lepid 39:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Nakanishi Y (1996) Population structure and dispersals of the sulfur butterfly Colias erate (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in an isolated plain located in a cool temperate zone of Japan. Jpn J Entomol 64:17–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Sasaki N (2010) Pattern of sperm storage and migration in the reproductive tract of the swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus: cryptic female choice after second mating. Physiol Entomol 35:328–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Sato K (1993) A spermatophore structured in the bursa copulatrix of the small white Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) during copulation and its sugar content. J Res Lepid 32:26–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Nakanishi Y, Bon’no M (1997) Prolonged copulation and spermatophore size ejaculated in the sulfur butterfly, Colias erate (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) under selective harassments of mated pairs by conspecific lone males. J Ethol 15:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Wiklund C, Bon’no M (1998) The effect of repeated matings on sperm numbers in successive ejaculates of the cabbage white butterfly Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). J Insect Behav 11:559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M, Bon’no M, Hachisuka A (2000) Eupyrene sperm migrates to spermatheca after apyrene sperm in the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J Ethol 18:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N (2006) Male genotype affects female fitness in a paternally investing species. Evolution 60:1638–1645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Cook PA (1999a) Strategic sperm allocation in the small white butterfly Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Funct Ecol 13:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Cook PA (1999b) Butterflies tailor their ejaculate in response to sperm competition risk and intensity. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1033–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickman P-O (1985) Male determined mating duration in butterflies? J Lepid Soc 39:341–342

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watanabe, M. (2016). Avoidance of Sperm Competition in Males. In: Sperm Competition in Butterflies. Ecological Research Monographs. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55945-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics