Abstract
Caused by synoptic changes and the diurnal cycle, the atmospheric boundary layer is never steady state. The unsteadiness is especially pronounced within and above the urban canopy layer. In former times, it was not possible to take the natural variability of the urban atmosphere properly into account, due to a lack of both computer power for models of adequate sophistication and sufficiently matured measurement techniques. Instead of this, quasi-steady situations were assumed, despite the fact that in reality they do not exist. The situation has improved now. After a brief description of the numerical tools which are presently available, their potential to simulate urban flow and dispersion episodes is assessed. The importance of validating these tools is stressed, and the question of how to obtain reliable validation data is discussed. Using combinations of field and laboratory data for the validation procedure is recommended. Finally, at the concrete example of puff dispersion within the urban canopy layer, it is demonstrated how such data sets can be generated and actually applied.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allwine KJ, Leach MJ, Stockham LW, Shinn JS, Hosker RP, Bowers JF, Pace JC (2004) Overview of Joint Urban 2003 – an atmospheric dispersion study in Oklahoma City. Symposium on planning, nowcasting, and forecasting in the Urban zone, Seattle, 11–15 Jan 2004. Am Meteor Soc J 7.1
Britter R, Schatzmann M (eds) (2007a) Background and justification document to support the model evaluation guidance and protocol document. COST Office, Brussels. ISBN 3-00-018312-4
Britter R, Schatzmann M (eds) (2007b) Model evaluation guidance and protocol document. COST Office, Brussels. ISBN 3-00-018312-4
Castro IP (2003) CFD for external aerodynamics in the built environment. QNET-CFD Netw Newsl 2(2):4–7
Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlünzen H, Carissimo B (eds) (2007) Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment. COST Office, Brussels. ISBN 3-00-018312-4
Hanna SR, Brown MJ, Camelli FE, Chan ST, Coirier WJ, Kim S, Hansen OR, Huber AH, Reynolds RM (2006) Detailed simulations of atmospheric flow and dispersion in Downtown Manhattan: an application of five computational fluid dynamics models. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87(12):1713–1726
Harms F (2010) Systematische Windkanaluntersuchungen zur Charakterisierung instationärer Ausbreitungsprozesse einzelner Gaswolken in urbanen Rauigkeitsstrukturen. PhD thesis, University of Hamburg (in German)
Harms F, Leitl B, Schatzmann M, Patnaik G (2011) Validating LES-based flow and dispersion models. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99:289–295
Hertwig D (2008) Dispersion in an urban environment with a focus on puff releases. Study Project, Meteorological Institute, University of Hamburg
Hertwig D (2013) On aspects of large-eddy simulation validation for near surface atmospheric flows. PhD thesis, University of Hamburg
Klein PM, Young DT (2011) Concentration fluctuations in a downtown urban area. Part I: analysis of Joint Urban 2003 full-scale fast-response measurements. Environ Fluid Mech 11:23–42
Leitl B (2000) Validation data for microscale dispersion modelling. EUROTRAC Newsl 22:28–32
Leitl B, Schatzmann M (2010) Validation data for urban flow and dispersion models: are wind tunnel data qualified? The fifth international symposium on computational wind engineering (CWE2010), Chapel Hill, 23–27 May 2010
Martin D, Price CS, White IR, Nickless G, Dobre A, Shallcross DE (2008) A study of pollutant concentration variability in an urban street under low wind speeds. Atmos Sci Lett 9:147–152
Oberkampf WL, Trucano TG, Hirsch C (2004) Verification, validation, and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics. Appl Mech Rev 57:345–384
Oikawa S, Meng Y (1995) Turbulence characteristics and organized motion in a suburban roughness sublayer. Bound-Lay Met 74:289–312
Oke TR (1988) The urban energy balance. Prog Phys Geogr 12:471–508
Patnaik G, Boris J, Lee MY, Young T, Leitl B, Harms F, Schatzmann M (2009) Validation of an LES urban aerodynamics model with model and application specific wind tunnel data. In: Proceeding of the 7th Asia-Pacific conference on wind engineering, Taipei, 8–12 Nov 2009
Repschies D, Leitl B, Schatzmann M (2006) Validation of urban dispersion models: how representative are locally measured wind velocities? In: Proceedings of the 10th annual George Mason University Conference on atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling. Fairfax, 1–3 Aug 2006
Roache PJ (1998) Verification and validation in computational science and engineering. Hermosa Publishers, New Mexico
Rotach M, Vogt R, Bernhofer C, Batchvarova E, Christen A, Clappier A, Feddersen B, Gryning SE, Martucci G, Mayer H, Mitev V, Oke TR, Parlow E, Richner H, Roth M, Roulet YA, Ruffieux D, Salmond JA, Schatzmann M, Voogt JA (2005) BUBBLE- an urban boundary layer meteorology project. Theor Appl Climatol 81:231–261
Roth M (2000) Review of atmospheric turbulence over cities. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 126:941–990
Schatzmann M, Leitl B (2011) Issues with validation of urban flow and dispersion CFD models. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99:169–186
Schatzmann M, Bächlin W, Emeis S, Kühlwein J, Leitl B, Müller WJ, Schäfer K, Schlünzen H (2006) Development and validation of tools for the implementation of European Air Quality Policy in Germany (project VALIUM). Atmos Chem Phys 6:3077–3083
Schatzmann M, Olesen H, Franke J (eds) (2010) COST 732 model evaluation case studies: approaches and results. COST Office, Brussels, 121 pages. ISBN 3-00-018312-4
Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Yoshie R, Kataoka H, Nozu T, Yoshikawa M, Shirasawa T (2008) AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96:1749–1761
Yoshie R, Mochida A, Tominaga Y, Kataoka H, Harimoto K, Nozu T, Shirasawa T (2007) Cooperative project for CFD prediction of pedestrian wind environment in the Architectural Institute of Japan. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95:1551–1578
Acknowledgements
The experimental data was gathered within a DTRA-funded joint research project between the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington DC and the Environmental Wind Tunnel Laboratory at the University of Hamburg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harms, F., Hertwig, D., Leitl, B., Schatzmann, M. (2016). Trends in the Field of Quality Assurance of Urban Flow and Dispersion Models. In: Tamura, Y., Yoshie, R. (eds) Advanced Environmental Wind Engineering. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55912-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55912-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55910-8
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55912-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)