Abstract
Various models have been proposed to aid understanding of the key factors for PEBs and the relationships between them. This chapter explains some of the more well-known general behavior models that can be applied to PEBs, such as Schwartz’s model and the theory of planned behavior (TPB) model first. Then, models specific to PEBs, such as value–belief–norm (VBN) model, motivation–opportunity–ability (MOA) model, and two-phase model, are explained. Besides, since many works have been conducted to investigate the determinants for PEBs, the motivation to compile and assess the preceding works naturally rises. The meta-analyses of preceding works are also shown in this chapter and finally the empirical models which refer to several theories empirically show the relationships involving not only sociopsychological variables but also sometimes sociodemographic variables. The aim of these trials is not to establish a new theory but to show the applicability of previous theories and to understand the influential factors on the target PEB. In the final section, several examples of these trials are shown.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211
Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Amitage CJ, Conner M (2001) Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 40:471–499
Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 27:14–25
Barr S (2003) Strategies for sustainability: citizens and responsible environmental behavior. Area 35(3):227–240
Black JS, Stern PC, Elworth JT (1985) Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations. J Appl Psychol 70(1):3–21
Bortoleto AP, Kurisu KH, Hanaki K (2012) Model development for household waste prevention behavior. Waste Manag 32(12):2195–2207
Davies J, Foxall GR, Pallister J (2002) Beyond the intention–behaviour mythology an integrated model of recycling. Mark Theory 2(1):29–113
Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD (1978) The “New Environmental Paradigm”. J Environ Educ 9(4):10–19
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Weseley, Reading (out of print, accessible online at http://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html)
Godin G, Kok G (1996) The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot 11(2):87–98
Hansen T, Jensen JM, Solgaard HS (2004) Predicting online grocery buying intention: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Int J Inf Manag 24:539–550
Hines JM, Hungerford HR, Tomera AN (1987) Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. J Environ Educ 18(2):1–8
Hirose Y (1994) Determinants of environment-conscious behavior. Jpn J Soc Psychol 10(1):44–55 (in Japanese)
Kollmass A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the Gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260
Lee H, Kurisu K, Hanaki K (2013) Influential factors on pro-environmental behaviors – a case study in Tokyo and Seoul. Low Carbon Econ 4:104–116
MacCarty JA, Shrum LJ (2001) The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. J Public Policy Mark 20(1):93–104
Madden TJ, Ellen PS, Ajzen I (1992) A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 18(3):3–9
Ölander F, Thogerson J (1995) Understanding consumer behavior as a prerequisite for environmental protection. J Consum Policy 18:345–385
Schwartz SH (1968a) Awareness of consequences and the influence of moral norms on interpersonal behavior. Sociometry 31(4):355–369
Schwartz SH (1968b) Words, deeds and the perception of consequences and responsibility in action situations. J Pers Soc Psychol 10(3):232–242
Schwartz SH (1970a) Moral decision making and behavior. In: Macaulay J, Berkowitz L (eds) Altruism and helping behavior. Academic Press, New York, pp 127–141
Schwartz SH (1970b) Elicitation of moral obligation and self-sacrificing behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 15(4):283–293
Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on Altruism. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental psychology, vol 10. Academic Press, pp 221–279
Schwartz SH, Howard J (1981) 9. A normative decision-making model of altruism. In: Rushton JP, Sorrentino RM (eds) Altruism and helping behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale
Stern PC (2000) New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56(3):407–424
Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6(2):81–97
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kurisu, K. (2015). Behavior Model Development for Understanding PEBs. In: Pro-environmental Behaviors. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55834-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55834-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55832-3
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55834-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)