Abstract
As some of the buildings in Aceh, Indonesia constructed after the 2004 Tsunami disaster were found vulnerable they were retrofitted to make them safe against earthquake. The retrofitting was carried out by many agencies; one among them being Save the Children. The retrofitting work was carried out to raise the awareness of the people and also to sensitize them about earthquake safe buildings construction techniques and also to contribute to earthquake disaster risk reduction. Against the widely held perception that it is expensive and complicated process the retrofitting work was found cost effective in comparison to the cost of demolition and reconstructing new building. One of the key findings was retrofitting can be achieved through the use of simple methods, tools and equipment and local human resource. The retrofitting process and onsite training can also be an effective medium for dissemination of best construction practices in the community. In order to assess the impact of retrofitting work, a survey was carried out in 2009 in the area where they were carried out during 2005–2008. A total of 104 people who were involved in retrofitting/rehabilitation process were interviewed. The survey results show that the respondents felt that the impact of retrofitting work in transferring knowledge in the community is not significant. However, the respondents felt that the retrofitting work had definite impact in raising awareness of disaster risks and measures for disaster risk reduction. The findings can be replicated in the areas having similar type of buildings. It can be stated after its findings that retrofitting of school building does not only make the schools safer and reduces the risk of children at risk but also is cost effective compared to new construction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
SNI 2847 .3 (2002) Indonesian Standard for Design of Concrete Structures
SNI 1726 .3 (2003) Indonesian Standard of Design of Senior High School Building
Allen KM (2006) Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: local capacity-building in the Philippines. Disasters 30(1):81–101
Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1988) Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazard: a handbook (Report ATC -21). Applied Technology Council, Redwood City
Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. In: ATC-40, vols 1 and 2. Seismic Safety Commission, State of California
Federal Emergency Management Agency (1988a) NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington
Federal Emergency Management Agency (1988b) Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazard: supporting document. Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington
Federal Emergency Management Agency (1988) Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazard: a handbook, Building Seismic Safety Council. In: FEMA 154. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington
Federal Emergency Management Agency (1992) Handbook for the seismic evaluation of existing buildings. Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington
IOM (International Organization for Migration) (2005) Post disaster damage assessment in Nanggroe, Aceh
Karanci AN, Aksit B, Dirik G (2005) Impact of a community disaster awareness training program in Turkey: does it influence hazard-related cognitions and preparedness behaviors? Soc Behav Pers 33(3):243–258
Kennedy J, Ashmore J, Babister E, Kelman I (2008) The meaning of “Build Back Better”: evidence from post-tsunami Aceh and Sri Lanka. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 16:24–36
Oxfam International (2005) A place to stay, a place to live: challenges in providing shelter in India, Indonesia, and Sri Lanka after the tsunami. Oxfam Briefing Note, Oxford
Pearce L (2003) Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: how to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards 28(2–3):211–228
Shrestha HD, Pribadi KS, Kusumastuti D, Lim E (2009) Manual on retrofitting of existing vulnerable school buildings—assessment to retrofitting
Shrestha HD, Yatabe Y, Bhandary NP, Subedi J (2012) Vulnerability assessment and retrofitting of existing school buildings: a case study of Aceh. Int J Disast Resilience Built Environ 3(1): 52–65
Shrestha HD, Yatabe Y, Bhandary NP, Subedi J (2013) The impact of retrofitting work on awareness raising and knowledge transfer in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 4(4):182–189
Subedi J (2010) Disaster informatics: information management s a tool for effective disaster risk reduction. In: Advanced ICTs for disaster management and threat detection: collaborative and distributed frameworks. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 80–94
UNESCO U (2007) Manual for restoration and retrofitting of rural structures in Kashmir. University of Roorkee (1994), Earthquake problem: do and don’ts for protection
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disater Reduction) (2005) Hyogo framework for action 2005–nations and communities to disasters
UNRC/BRR (2009) Tsunami recovery indicator package
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shrestha, H.D. (2015). Vulnerability Assessment and Retrofitting of Existing Buildings in Aceh and Transfer of Knowledge to the Community. In: Shaw, R. (eds) Recovery from the Indian Ocean Tsunami. Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55117-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55117-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55116-4
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55117-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)