Skip to main content

Productivity and Modes of Internationalization: Evidence from Japanese Firms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Internationalization of Japanese Firms

Abstract

Firms decide to enter international markets, either through exports, or by engaging in foreign direct investments (FDI), based on not only their productivity advantages, but also market and firm-specific factors. This paper empirically investigates what modes of internationalization are chosen by Japanese firms internationalizing in US/European countries and East Asian countries, with a focus on the difference in market-specific factors between regions as well as the productivity heterogeneity between firms. Our analysis, using firm-level data pertaining to 12,000 Japanese organizations, confirms that internationalized firms have higher productivity relative to non-internationalized firms. Further, it reveals that firms engaged in FDI in the U.S. and/or Europe have higher productivity as compared to firms that export to these market destinations. However, this result does not hold for Japanese firms that operate in markets in East Asian markets. The estimated results indicate that the mode of internationalization chosen by a firm is not uniquely determined by its productivity levels, but also reflects market specific-factors in destination countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Countries classified by North and South are listed in Appendix.

  2. 2.

    TFP data used for the analysis in this paper is sourced from Wakasugi et~al. (2008).

  3. 3.

    Aw and Lee (2008) empirically investigate Taiwanese firms that internationalize in two different regions: the U.S. and China. Their findings suggest that the productivity of firms investing in China is higher than an exporter’s productivity, the productivity of firms investing in North America is higher than that for firms investing in China, and the productivity of firms internationalizing to both countries is the highest. But their examination is not exhaustive, and analyzing two very different market types. That is, their analysis is based on only a small number of firms operating in limited industries. Also, their analysis is not clear when it comes to identifying what factors actually affect the relationship between productivity and the mode of internationalization.

References

  • Aw, B. Y., & Lee, Y. (2008). Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Taiwanese multinationals. Journal of International Economics, 76, 403–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (2007). Firm structure, multinationals, and manufacturing plant deaths. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2006). Multi-product firms and product switching. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 12293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., Kortum, S., & Kramarz, F. (2004). Dissecting trade: Firms, industries, and export destinations. American Economic Review, 94(2), 150–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, K., & Ries, J. (2003). Heterogeneity and the FDI versus export decision of Japanese manufacturers. Journal of Japanese and International Economies, 17, 448–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (2006). Trade, FDI, and the Organization of Firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(3), 589–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94(2), 300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, F., & Kiyota, K. (2006). Exports, FDI, and productivity: Dynamic evidence from Japanese firms. Review of World Economics, 142(4), 695–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, M. (2009). Firm export dynamics and the geography of trade. Journal of International Economics, 77(2), 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T., & Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2007). The happy few: The internationalisation of European Firms. Bruegel Blueprint Series, Bruegel, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomiura, E. (2007). Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI: A productivity comparison at the firm level. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeaple, S. R. (2009). Firm heterogeneity and the structure of U.S. multinational activity. Journal of International Economics, 78(2), 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakaksugi, R., Todo, Y., Sato, H., Nishioka, S., Matsuura, T., Ito, B., et~al. (2008). The internationalization of Japanese firms: New findings based on firm-level data. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 08-E-036.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Lee Branstetter, Masahisa Fujita, Ronald Jones, Yasuyuki Todo, Eiichi Tomiura, the participants of the 2010 AEA Annual Meeting, held in Atlanta, in January, 2010 and those of the seminars at Kyoto University, Keio University, and RIETI for their valuable comments and suggestions. We also thank Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) in the Government of Japan for granting us access to and use of firm-level data of the government’s statistics “Basic Survey of Japanese Business Structure and Activities”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryuhei Wakasugi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: List of Countries

Appendix: List of Countries

North America

East Asian countries

 Canada

 Brunei

 USA

 Cambodia

Europe

 China

 Albania

 Hong Kong

 Austria

 Indonesia

 Belgium

 Korea

 Bulgaria

 Laos

 CIS countries

 Malaysia

 Cyprus

 Mongolia

 Czech

 Philippines

 Denmark

 Taiwan

 Finland

 Thailand

 Former Yugoslavia

 Vietnam

 France

 

 Germany

 

 Greece

 

 Hungary

 

 Iceland

 

 Ireland

 

 Italy

 

 Luxembourg

 

 Marta

 

 Netherlands

 

 Norway

 

 Poland

 

 Portugal

 

 Romania

 

 Slovakia

 

 Spain

 

 Sweden

 

 Switzerland

 

 Turkey

 

 United Kingdom

 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Ryuhei Wakasugi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wakasugi, R., Tanaka, A. (2014). Productivity and Modes of Internationalization: Evidence from Japanese Firms. In: Wakasugi, R. (eds) Internationalization of Japanese Firms. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54532-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics