Abstract
Firms decide to enter international markets, either through exports, or by engaging in foreign direct investments (FDI), based on not only their productivity advantages, but also market and firm-specific factors. This paper empirically investigates what modes of internationalization are chosen by Japanese firms internationalizing in US/European countries and East Asian countries, with a focus on the difference in market-specific factors between regions as well as the productivity heterogeneity between firms. Our analysis, using firm-level data pertaining to 12,000 Japanese organizations, confirms that internationalized firms have higher productivity relative to non-internationalized firms. Further, it reveals that firms engaged in FDI in the U.S. and/or Europe have higher productivity as compared to firms that export to these market destinations. However, this result does not hold for Japanese firms that operate in markets in East Asian markets. The estimated results indicate that the mode of internationalization chosen by a firm is not uniquely determined by its productivity levels, but also reflects market specific-factors in destination countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Countries classified by North and South are listed in Appendix.
- 2.
TFP data used for the analysis in this paper is sourced from Wakasugi et~al. (2008).
- 3.
Aw and Lee (2008) empirically investigate Taiwanese firms that internationalize in two different regions: the U.S. and China. Their findings suggest that the productivity of firms investing in China is higher than an exporter’s productivity, the productivity of firms investing in North America is higher than that for firms investing in China, and the productivity of firms internationalizing to both countries is the highest. But their examination is not exhaustive, and analyzing two very different market types. That is, their analysis is based on only a small number of firms operating in limited industries. Also, their analysis is not clear when it comes to identifying what factors actually affect the relationship between productivity and the mode of internationalization.
References
Aw, B. Y., & Lee, Y. (2008). Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Taiwanese multinationals. Journal of International Economics, 76, 403–415.
Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25.
Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (2007). Firm structure, multinationals, and manufacturing plant deaths. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 1–11.
Bernard, A. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2006). Multi-product firms and product switching. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 12293.
Eaton, J., Kortum, S., & Kramarz, F. (2004). Dissecting trade: Firms, industries, and export destinations. American Economic Review, 94(2), 150–154.
Head, K., & Ries, J. (2003). Heterogeneity and the FDI versus export decision of Japanese manufacturers. Journal of Japanese and International Economies, 17, 448–467.
Helpman, E. (2006). Trade, FDI, and the Organization of Firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(3), 589–630.
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94(2), 300–316.
Kimura, F., & Kiyota, K. (2006). Exports, FDI, and productivity: Dynamic evidence from Japanese firms. Review of World Economics, 142(4), 695–719.
Lawless, M. (2009). Firm export dynamics and the geography of trade. Journal of International Economics, 77(2), 245–254.
Mayer, T., & Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2007). The happy few: The internationalisation of European Firms. Bruegel Blueprint Series, Bruegel, Brussels.
Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.
Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263–1297.
Tomiura, E. (2007). Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI: A productivity comparison at the firm level. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 113–127.
Yeaple, S. R. (2009). Firm heterogeneity and the structure of U.S. multinational activity. Journal of International Economics, 78(2), 206–215.
Wakaksugi, R., Todo, Y., Sato, H., Nishioka, S., Matsuura, T., Ito, B., et~al. (2008). The internationalization of Japanese firms: New findings based on firm-level data. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 08-E-036.
Acknowledgments
We thank Lee Branstetter, Masahisa Fujita, Ronald Jones, Yasuyuki Todo, Eiichi Tomiura, the participants of the 2010 AEA Annual Meeting, held in Atlanta, in January, 2010 and those of the seminars at Kyoto University, Keio University, and RIETI for their valuable comments and suggestions. We also thank Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) in the Government of Japan for granting us access to and use of firm-level data of the government’s statistics “Basic Survey of Japanese Business Structure and Activities”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: List of Countries
Appendix: List of Countries
North America | East Asian countries |
Canada | Brunei |
USA | Cambodia |
Europe | China |
Albania | Hong Kong |
Austria | Indonesia |
Belgium | Korea |
Bulgaria | Laos |
CIS countries | Malaysia |
Cyprus | Mongolia |
Czech | Philippines |
Denmark | Taiwan |
Finland | Thailand |
Former Yugoslavia | Vietnam |
France | |
Germany | |
Greece | |
Hungary | |
Iceland | |
Ireland | |
Italy | |
Luxembourg | |
Marta | |
Netherlands | |
Norway | |
Poland | |
Portugal | |
Romania | |
Slovakia | |
Spain | |
Sweden | |
Switzerland | |
Turkey | |
United Kingdom |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Ryuhei Wakasugi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wakasugi, R., Tanaka, A. (2014). Productivity and Modes of Internationalization: Evidence from Japanese Firms. In: Wakasugi, R. (eds) Internationalization of Japanese Firms. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54532-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54532-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54531-6
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54532-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)