Abstract
There have been many works that verify the possibility of the small deviation of the statistical isotropy, e.g., the so-called “Axis of Evil”. The analyses of the power spectrum by employing the current CMB data suggest that the deviation of the statistical isotropy is about 10 % at most. As is well known, it might be difficult to explain such statistical anisotropy in the standard inflationary scenario. However, recently, there have been several works about the possibility of generating the statistically anisotropic primordial density fluctuations in order to introduce nontrivial dynamics of the vector field. Owing to the effect of fluctuations of the vector field, the primordial density fluctuations may have a small deviation from the statistical isotropy and also the deviation from the Gaussian statistics. Hence, we can expect that there are characteristic signals not only in the CMB power spectrum but also in the CMB bispectrum. With these motivations, we calculate the CMB statistically anisotropic bispectrum sourced from the curvature perturbations generated in the modified hybrid inflation scenario. Then, we find the peculiar configurations of the multipoles which never appear in the isotropic bispectrum, like off-diagonal components in the CMB power spectrum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
N.E. Groeneboom, H.K. Eriksen, Astrophys. J. 690, 1807 (2009). doi:10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1807
N.E. Groeneboom, L. Ackerman, I.K. Wehus, H.K. Eriksen, Astrophys. J. 722, 452 (2010). doi:10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/452
M. Frommert, T.A. Enßlin, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 403, 1739 (2010). doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16255.x
D. Hanson, A. Lewis, Phys. Rev. D80, 063004 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.063004
C.L. Bennett, et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 17 (2011). doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/17
D. Hanson, A. Lewis, A. Challinor, Phys. Rev. D81, 103003 (2010). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.103003
L. Ackerman, S.M. Carroll, M.B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D75, 083502 (2007). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083502
C.G. Boehmer, D.F. Mota, Phys. Lett. B663, 168 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.04.008
Y. Shtanov, H. Pyatkovska, Phys. Rev. D80, 023521 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.023521
M.a. Watanabe, S. Kanno, J. Soda, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 412, L83 (2011). doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01010.x
A. Gumrukcuoglu, B. Himmetoglu, M. Peloso, Phys. Rev. D81, 063528 (2010). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.063528
K. Dimopoulos, Phys. Rev. D74, 083502 (2006). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.083502
T. Koivisto, D.F. Mota, JCAP 0808, 021 (2008). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/021
S. Yokoyama, J. Soda, JCAP 0808, 005 (2008). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/005
K. Dimopoulos, M. Karciauskas, D.H. Lyth, Y. Rodriguez, JCAP 0905, 013 (2009). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/013
M. Karciauskas, K. Dimopoulos, D.H. Lyth, Phys. Rev. D80, 023509 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.023509
N. Bartolo, E. Dimastrogiovanni, S. Matarrese, A. Riotto, JCAP 0910, 015 (2009). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/015
K. Dimopoulos, M. Karciauskas, J.M. Wagstaff, Phys. Rev. D81, 023522 (2010). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.023522
K. Dimopoulos, M. Karciauskas, J.M. Wagstaff, Phys. Lett. B683, 298 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.024
C.A. Valenzuela-Toledo, Y. Rodriguez, Phys. Lett. B685, 120 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.01.060
C.A. Valenzuela-Toledo, arXiv:1004.5363 (2010)
E. Dimastrogiovanni, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, A. Riotto, Adv. Astron. 2010, 752670 (2010). doi:10.1155/2010/752670
K. Dimopoulos, J.M. Wagstaff, Phys. Rev. D83, 023523 (2011). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.023523
M. Karciauskas, JCAP 1201, 014 (2012). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/01/014
M. Shiraishi, D. Nitta, S. Yokoyama, K. Ichiki, K. Takahashi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 125, 795 (2011). doi:10.1143/PTP.125.795
M. Shiraishi, S. Yokoyama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 126, 923 (2011). doi:10.1143/PTP.126.923
A.A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B117, 175 (1982). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90541-X
A.A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. 42, 152 (1985)
M. Sasaki, E.D. Stewart, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95, 71 (1996). doi:10.1143/PTP.95.71
M. Sasaki, T. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 99, 763 (1998). doi:10.1143/PTP.99.763
D.H. Lyth, K.A. Malik, M. Sasaki, JCAP 0505, 004 (2005). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2005/05/004
D.H. Lyth, Y. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 121302 (2005). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.121302
J. Martin, J. Yokoyama, JCAP 0801, 025 (2008). doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/01/025
A. Lewis, A. Challinor, A. Lasenby, Astrophys. J. 538, 473 (2000). doi:10.1086/309179
A. Lewis, Phys. Rev. D70, 043011 (2004). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043011
Slatec common mathematical library. http://www.netlib.org/slatec/
The Planck Collaboration, arXiv:astro-ph/0604069 (2006)
E. Komatsu, et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 18 (2011). doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shiraishi, M. (2013). Violation of the Rotational Invariance in the CMB Bispectrum. In: Probing the Early Universe with the CMB Scalar, Vector and Tensor Bispectrum. Springer Theses. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54180-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54180-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-54179-0
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-54180-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)