Skip to main content

Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty

  • Chapter
Cervical Laminoplasty

Abstract

Until 1968, when Kirita [1] devised a sophisticated technique for extensive laminectomy in which the laminae were thinned and divided at the midline with a high-speed drill, both patients and surgeons had suffered from unpredictable results with conventional laminectomy. Being both safe and effective, Kirita’s technique brought remarkable progress in the surgical results of cervical compressive myelopathy. However, problems such as postoperative kyphosis, the vulnerability of the unprotected spinal cord, and the formation of a laminectomy membrane remained unsolved problems [2]. To address these problems, in 1973, Hattori and co-workers devised an expansive Z-laminoplasty in which the spinal canal was totally reconstructed with preservation of the posterior protective structures [3,4]. However, this technique did not gain widespread acceptance because it was too technically demanding as well as time-consuming. Hirabayashi et al. [5] modified Kirita’s method and decompressed the spinal cord by making bony gutters in both sides of the lamina followed by en-bloc resection of the laminae. The idea of open-door laminoplasty evolved when Hirabayashi [6] noted that pulsation of the dural tube occurred when he lifted one side of the laminae, indicating that sufficient decompression was obtained even before total resection of the laminae. He performed the first case of this procedure in 1977, and named it expansive open-door laminoplasty (ELAP; eelap). Since then, more than 500 patients have undergone this procedure at Keio University Hospital and affiliated hospitals with favorable results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kirita Y (1976) Posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis and OPLL. (in Japanese) Shujutsu 30:287–302

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cattell HS, Clark GL (1967) Cervical kyphosis and instability following multiple laminectomies in children. J Bone Joint Surg 49A:713–721

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kawai S, Sunago K, Doi K, et al. (1988) Cervical laminoplasty (Hattori’s method). Procedure and follow-up results. Spine 13:1245–1250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohyama M, Hattori S, Moriwaki N, et al. (1973) A new method of cervical laminectomy. (in Japanese) Chubu Nippon Siekeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 16:792–794

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, Chiba K (1999) Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop 1359:35–48

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hirabayashi K (1978) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, (in Japanese) Shujutsu 32:1159–1163

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fujimura Y, Nishi Y, Nakamura M (1997) Dorsal shift and expansion of the spinal cord after expansive open-door laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 10:282–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Herkowitz HN (1988) Cervical laminaplasty: its role in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. J Spinal Disord 1:179–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Norwinski GP, Visarius H, Nolte LP, et al. (1993) A biomechanical comparison of cervical laminaplasty and cervical laminectomy with progressive facetectomy. Spine 18:1995–2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, et al. (1992) Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 17:1281–1284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, et al. (1994) Laminoplasty following anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Int Orthop 18:1–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirabayashi K (1994) Expansive open-door laminoplasty. In: Sherk HH, Dunn EJ, Eismont FJ (eds) The cervical spine. An atlas of surgical procedures. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 233–250

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herkowitz HN (1988) A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy, and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine 13:774–780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Satomi K, Nishi Y, Kohno T, et al. (1994) Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 19:507–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Iwasaki M, Ebara S, Miyamoto S, et al. (1996) Expansive laminoplasty for cervical radiculomyelopathy due to soft disc herniation. Spine 21:32–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yonenobu K, Fuji T, Ono K, et al. (1985) Choice of surgical treatment for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 10:710–716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shinomiya K, Okamoto A, Kamikozuru M, et al. (1993) An analysis of failures in primary cervical anterior spinal cord decompression and fusion. J Spinal Disord 6: 277–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, et al. (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8:693–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Toyama Y, Hirabayashi H, Kamata M, et al. (1997) Long-term clinical results of anterior interbody fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy,(in Japanese) J East Jpn Orthop Traumatol 9:487–492

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y (1997) Choice of surgical procedure for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments. In: Yonenobu K, Sakou T, Ono K (eds) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Springer, Tokyo, pp 135–142

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fujimura Y, Nishi Y, Chiba K, et al. (1998) Multiple regression analysis of the factors influencing the results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:471–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hirabayashi K, Satomi K, Toyama Y (1998) Surgical management of OPLL: anterior versus posterior approach. Part II. In: The Cervical Spine Research Society Editorial Committee (eds) The cervical spine, 3rd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 876–887

    Google Scholar 

  23. Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, et al. (1995) Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. A radiographic study. Int Orthop 19:116–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maruiwa H, Chiba K, Watanabe M, et al. (2000) Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, (in Japanese) Rinsho Seikeigeka 35:411–416

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maruiwa H, Kamata M, Watanabe M, et al. (2000) Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the longitudinal ligament, (in Japanese) J Jpn Orthop Assoc 74:S690

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, et al. (1996) Lordotic alignment and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurol 243:626–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y (1995) Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:956–961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kohno K, Kumon Y, Oka Y, et al. (1997) Evaluation of prognostic factors following expansive laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 48: 237–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chiba K, Toyama Y, Watanabe M, et al. (2000) Impact of longitudinal distance of the cervical spine on the results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 25: 2893–2898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kazuhiro, C., Hirofumi, M., Morio, M., Kiyoshi, H., Yoshiaki, T. (2003). Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty. In: Nakamura, K., Toyama, Y., Hoshino, Y. (eds) Cervical Laminoplasty. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53983-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53983-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-67978-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-53983-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics