Abstract
Until 1968, when Kirita [1] devised a sophisticated technique for extensive laminectomy in which the laminae were thinned and divided at the midline with a high-speed drill, both patients and surgeons had suffered from unpredictable results with conventional laminectomy. Being both safe and effective, Kirita’s technique brought remarkable progress in the surgical results of cervical compressive myelopathy. However, problems such as postoperative kyphosis, the vulnerability of the unprotected spinal cord, and the formation of a laminectomy membrane remained unsolved problems [2]. To address these problems, in 1973, Hattori and co-workers devised an expansive Z-laminoplasty in which the spinal canal was totally reconstructed with preservation of the posterior protective structures [3,4]. However, this technique did not gain widespread acceptance because it was too technically demanding as well as time-consuming. Hirabayashi et al. [5] modified Kirita’s method and decompressed the spinal cord by making bony gutters in both sides of the lamina followed by en-bloc resection of the laminae. The idea of open-door laminoplasty evolved when Hirabayashi [6] noted that pulsation of the dural tube occurred when he lifted one side of the laminae, indicating that sufficient decompression was obtained even before total resection of the laminae. He performed the first case of this procedure in 1977, and named it expansive open-door laminoplasty (ELAP; eelap). Since then, more than 500 patients have undergone this procedure at Keio University Hospital and affiliated hospitals with favorable results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kirita Y (1976) Posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis and OPLL. (in Japanese) Shujutsu 30:287–302
Cattell HS, Clark GL (1967) Cervical kyphosis and instability following multiple laminectomies in children. J Bone Joint Surg 49A:713–721
Kawai S, Sunago K, Doi K, et al. (1988) Cervical laminoplasty (Hattori’s method). Procedure and follow-up results. Spine 13:1245–1250
Ohyama M, Hattori S, Moriwaki N, et al. (1973) A new method of cervical laminectomy. (in Japanese) Chubu Nippon Siekeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 16:792–794
Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, Chiba K (1999) Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop 1359:35–48
Hirabayashi K (1978) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, (in Japanese) Shujutsu 32:1159–1163
Fujimura Y, Nishi Y, Nakamura M (1997) Dorsal shift and expansion of the spinal cord after expansive open-door laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 10:282–287
Herkowitz HN (1988) Cervical laminaplasty: its role in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. J Spinal Disord 1:179–188
Norwinski GP, Visarius H, Nolte LP, et al. (1993) A biomechanical comparison of cervical laminaplasty and cervical laminectomy with progressive facetectomy. Spine 18:1995–2004
Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, et al. (1992) Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 17:1281–1284
Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, et al. (1994) Laminoplasty following anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Int Orthop 18:1–5
Hirabayashi K (1994) Expansive open-door laminoplasty. In: Sherk HH, Dunn EJ, Eismont FJ (eds) The cervical spine. An atlas of surgical procedures. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 233–250
Herkowitz HN (1988) A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy, and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine 13:774–780
Satomi K, Nishi Y, Kohno T, et al. (1994) Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 19:507–510
Iwasaki M, Ebara S, Miyamoto S, et al. (1996) Expansive laminoplasty for cervical radiculomyelopathy due to soft disc herniation. Spine 21:32–38
Yonenobu K, Fuji T, Ono K, et al. (1985) Choice of surgical treatment for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 10:710–716
Shinomiya K, Okamoto A, Kamikozuru M, et al. (1993) An analysis of failures in primary cervical anterior spinal cord decompression and fusion. J Spinal Disord 6: 277–288
Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, et al. (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8:693–699
Toyama Y, Hirabayashi H, Kamata M, et al. (1997) Long-term clinical results of anterior interbody fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy,(in Japanese) J East Jpn Orthop Traumatol 9:487–492
Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y (1997) Choice of surgical procedure for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments. In: Yonenobu K, Sakou T, Ono K (eds) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Springer, Tokyo, pp 135–142
Fujimura Y, Nishi Y, Chiba K, et al. (1998) Multiple regression analysis of the factors influencing the results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:471–474
Hirabayashi K, Satomi K, Toyama Y (1998) Surgical management of OPLL: anterior versus posterior approach. Part II. In: The Cervical Spine Research Society Editorial Committee (eds) The cervical spine, 3rd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 876–887
Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, et al. (1995) Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. A radiographic study. Int Orthop 19:116–121
Maruiwa H, Chiba K, Watanabe M, et al. (2000) Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, (in Japanese) Rinsho Seikeigeka 35:411–416
Maruiwa H, Kamata M, Watanabe M, et al. (2000) Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the longitudinal ligament, (in Japanese) J Jpn Orthop Assoc 74:S690
Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, et al. (1996) Lordotic alignment and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurol 243:626–632
Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y (1995) Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:956–961
Kohno K, Kumon Y, Oka Y, et al. (1997) Evaluation of prognostic factors following expansive laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 48: 237–245
Chiba K, Toyama Y, Watanabe M, et al. (2000) Impact of longitudinal distance of the cervical spine on the results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 25: 2893–2898
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kazuhiro, C., Hirofumi, M., Morio, M., Kiyoshi, H., Yoshiaki, T. (2003). Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty. In: Nakamura, K., Toyama, Y., Hoshino, Y. (eds) Cervical Laminoplasty. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53983-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53983-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-67978-3
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-53983-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive