Abstract
One of the most important attributes of cognitive activities in both human and nonhuman animals is the ability to recognize individual objects and to categorize a variety of objects that share some properties. Wild-living spider monkeys, for example, individually recognize their partners and a large number of other con-specifics quickly and accurately regardless of their highly variable spatial attitudes and also discriminate them from other species (J. Delius, personal observation). Object recognition and object categorization are both equally vital for most of the advanced animals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson JA, Hinton GE (1981) Models of information processing in the brain. In: Hinton GE, Anderson A (eds) Parallel models of associative memory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 9–48
Ashby FG, Maddox WT (1998) Stimulus categorization. In: Birnbaum MH (ed) Measurement, judgment, and decision making: handbook of perception and cognition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 251–301
Astley SL, Wasserman EA (1992) Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons: all negative stimuli are not created equal. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 18:193–207
Astley SL, Wasserman EA (1998) Novelty and functional equivalence in superordinate categorization by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 26:125–138
Astley SL, Wasserman EA (1999) Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 25:415–432
Aydin A, Pearce JM (1994) Prototype effects in categorization by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 20:264–277
Bovet D, Vauclair J (1998) Functional categorization of objects and of their pictures in baboons (Papio anubis). Learn Motiv 29:309–322
Bradshaw RH, Dawkins MS (1993) Slides of conspecifics as representatives of real animals in laying hens (Gallus domesticus). Behav Process 28:165–172
Cabe PA, Healey ML (1979) Figure-background color differences and transfer of discrimination from objects to line drawings with pigeons. Bull Psychon Soc 13:124–126
Cerella J (1977) Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon. Pattern Recogn 9:65–68
Cerella J (1990a) Pigeon pattern perception: limits on perspective invariance. Perception 19:141–159
Cerella J (1990b) Shape constancy in the pigeon: the perspective transformations decomposed. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Kosslyn SM, Mumford DB (eds) Quantitative analysis of behavior: behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation, vol 8. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 145–163
Cole PD, Honig WL (1994) Transfer of a discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) between pictured locations and the represented environments. J Comp Psychol 108:189–198
Cook RG, Katz JS (1999) Dynamic object perception by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 25:194–210
D’Amato MR, Sant PV (1988) The person concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:43–55
D’Amato MR, Salmon DP, Loukas E, Tomie A (1985) Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). J Exp Anal Behav 44:35–47
Delius JD (1992) Categorical discrimination of objects and pictures by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 20:301–311
Delius JD, Hollard VD (1995) Orientation invariance in pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. J Comp Psychol 109:278–290
Delius JD, Emmerton J, Hörster W, Jäger R, Ostheim J (1999) Picture-object recognition in pigeons. Current Psychology of Cognition 18:621–656
Dépy D, Fagot J, Vauclair J (1997) Categorization of three-dimensional stimuli by humans and baboons: search for prototype effects. Behav Process 39:299–306
Edelman S, Bülthoff HH (1992) Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Res 32:2385–2400
Edwards CA, Jagielo JA, Zentall TR, Hogan DE (1982) Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in matching to sample by pigeons: mediation by reinforcer-specific expectancies. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 8:244–259
Emmerton J (1983) Vision. In: Abs M (ed) Physiology and behavior of the pigeon. Academic Press, London, pp 245–266
Evans CS, Macedonia JM, Marler P (1993) Effects of apparent size and speed on the response of chickens, Gallus gallus, to computer-generated stimulations of aerial predators. Anim Behav 46:1–11
Fersen von L, Lea SEG (1990) Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features. J Exp Anal Behav 54:69–84
Fields L, Verhave T, Fath SJ (1984) Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: a methodological analysis. J Exp Anal Behav 42:143–157
Fields L, Landon-Jimenez V, Buffington DM, Adams BJ (1995) Maintained nodal-distance effects in equivalence classes. J Exp Anal Behav 64:129–145
Fujita K, Matsuzawa T (1986) A new procedure to study perceptual world on animals with sensory reinforcement: recognition of humans by a chimpanzee. Primates 27:283–291
Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Goldman D, Homa D (1997) Integrative and metric properties of abstracted information as a function of category discriminability, instance variability, and experience. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 3:375–385
Hendricks J (1966) Flicker threshold as determined by a modified conditioned suppression procedure. J Exp Anal Behav 9:501–506
Herbranson WT, Fremouw T, Shimp CP (1999) The randomization procedure in the study of categorization of multidimensional stimuli by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 25:113–135
Herman LM, Pack AA, Morris-Samuels P (1993) Representational and conceptual skills of dolphins. In: Roitblat HL, Herman LM, Nachtigall PE (eds) Language and communication: comparative perspectives. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 403–422
Herrnstein RJ (1985) Riddles of natural categorization. Philos Trans R Soc B 308:129–144
Herrnstein RJ (1990) Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach. Cognition 37:133–166
Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH (1964) Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science 146:549–551
Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH, Cable C (1976) Natural concepts in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2:285–302
Hollard DV, Delius DJ (1982) Rotation invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. Science 218:804–806
Hopkins WD, Fagot J, Vauclair J (1993) Mirror-image matching and mental rotation problem solving in baboons (Papio papio): unilateral input enhance performance. J Exp Psychol Gen 122:61–72
Huber L, Lenz R (1993) A test of the linear feature model of polymorphous concept discrimination with pigeons. Q J Exp Psychol 46B:1–18
Huber L, Lenz R (1996) Categorization of prototypical stimulus classes by pigeons. Q J Exp Psychol 48:134–147
Iverson I, Sidman M, Carrigan P (1986) Stimulus definition in conditional discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav 45:297–304
Jitsumori M (1993) Category discrimination of artificial polymorphous stimuli based on feature learning. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 19:244–254
Jitsumori M (1994) Discrimination of artificial polymorphous categories by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatto). Q J Exp Psychol 47:371–386
Jitsumori M (1996) A prototype effects and categorization of artificial polymorphous stimuli in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 22:405–419
Jitsumori M, Matsuzawa T (1991) Picture perception in monkeys and pigeons: transfer of rightside-up versus upside-down discrimination of photographic objects across conceptual categories. Primates 32:473–482
Jitsumori M, Ohkubo O (1996) Orientation discrimination and categorization of photographs of natural objects by pigeons. Behav Process 38:205–226
Jitsumori M, Yoshihara M (1997) Categorical discrimination of human facial expressions by pigeons: a test of the linear feature model. Q J Exp Psychol 50B:253–268
Jitsumori M, Natori M, Okuyama K (1999) Recognition of moving video images of conspecifics by pigeons: effects of individuals, static and dynamic motion cues, and movement. Anim Learn Behav 27:303–315
Keller FS, Schoenfeld WN (1950) Principles of psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Knapp AG, Anderson JA (1984) Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 10(4):616–637
Kuno H, Kitadate H, Iwamoto T (1994) Formation of transitivity in conditional matching to sample by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 62:399–408
Lea SEG (1984) In what sense do pigeons learn concepts? In: Roitblat HL, Bever T, Terrace HS (eds) Animal cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 263–277
Lea SEG, Harrison SN (1978) Discrimination of polymorphous stimulus sets by pigeons. Q J Exp Psychol 30:521–537
Lea SEG, Ryan CME (1983) Feature analysis of pigeons’ acquisition of concept discrimination. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Wagner AR (eds) Quantitative analysis of behavior: discrimination processes, vol 4. Ballinger, Cambridge, pp 263–276
Lea SEG, Ryan CME (1990) Unnatural concepts and the theory of concept discrimination in birds. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Kosslyn S, Mumford D (eds) Quantitative analysis of behavior: behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation, vol 8. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 165–185
Lea SEG, Lohmann A, Ryan CME (1993) Discrimination of five-dimensional stimuli by pigeons: limitations of feature analysis. Q J Exp Psychol 46:19–42
Lipkens R, Kop PFM, Matthijs W (1988) A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 49:395–409
Lohmann A, Delius JD, Hollard VD, Friesel M (1988) Discrimination of shape reflections and shape orientations by Columba livia. J Comp Psychol 102:3–13
Lumsden EA (1977) Generalization of an operant response to photographs and drawing/silhouettes of a three-dimensional object at various orientations. Bull Psychon Soc 10:405–407
Mackintosh NJ (1995) Categorization by people and pigeons: the twenty-second Bartlett memorial lectures. Q J Exp Psychol 48B(3):193–214
Makino H, Jitsumori M (in press) Category learning and prototype effect in pigeons: a study by using morphed images of human faces. Jpn J Psychol (in Japanese)
McIntire KD, Cleary J, Thompson T (1987) Conditional relations by monkeys: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. J Exp Anal Behav 47:279–285
McQuoid LM, Galef BF Jr (1993) Social stimuli influencing feeding behavior of Burmese fowl: a video analysis. Anim Behav 46:13–22
Miller RJ (1973) Cross-cultural research in the perception of pictorial materials. Psychol Bull 80:135–150
Neumann PG (1974) An attribute frequency model for the abstraction of prototypes. Mem Cogn 2:241–248
Neumann PG (1977) Visual prototype information with discontinuous representation of dimensions of variability. Mem Cogn 5:187–197
Patterson-Kane E, Nicol CJ, Foster TM, Temple W (1997) Limited perception of video images by domestic hens. Anim Behav 53:951–963
Powell RW (1967) The pulse-to-cycle fraction as a determinant of critical flicker fusion in the pigeon. Psychol Rec 17:151–160
Rips L (1994) The psychology of proof: deductive reasoning in human thinking. MIT Press, Cambridge
Roberts WA (1996) Stimulus generalization and hierarchical structure in categorization by animals. In: Zentall TR, Smeets PM (eds) Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 35–54
Roberts WA, Mazmanian DS (1988) Concept learning at different levels of abstraction by pigeons, monkeys, and people. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:247–260
Ryan CME, Lea SEG (1994) Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds. Behav Process 33:155–176
Sands SF, Lincoln CE, Wright AA (1982) Pictorial similarity judgments and the organization of visual memory in the rhesus monkey. J Exp Psychol Gen 3:369–389
Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Rumbaugh DM, Smith ST, Lawson J (1980) Reference: the linguistic essential. Science 210:922–925
Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Pate JL, Lawson J, Smith ST, Rosenbaum S (1983) Can a chimpanzee make a statement? J Exp Psychol Gen 112:457–492
Schrier AM, Brady PM (1987) Categorization of natural stimuli by monkeys (Macaca mulatta): effects of stimulus set size and modification of exemplars. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 13:136–143
Schrier AM, Angarella R, Povar ML (1984) Studies of concept formation by stumptailed monkeys: concepts humans, monkeys, and letter A. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 10:564–584
Schusterman RJ, Kastak D (1993) A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. Psychol Rec 43:823–839
Schyns PG (1991) A modular neural network model of concept acquisition. Cogn Sci 15:461–508
Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171:701–703
Sidman M (1994) Equivalence relations and behavior: a research story. Authors Cooperative, Boston
Sidman M, Tailby W (1982) Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav 37:5–22
Sidman M, Rauzin R, Lazar R, Cunningham S, Tailby W, Carrigan P (1982) A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. J Exp Anal Behav 37:23–44
Steirn JN, Jackson-Smith P, Zentall TR (1991) Mediational use of internal representations of food and no-food events by pigeons. Learn Motiv 22:353–365
Tolan JC, Rogers CM, Malone DR (1981) Cross-modal matching in monkeys: altered visual cues and delay. Neuropsychologia 19:289–300
Tomonaga M, Matsuzawa T, Fujita K, Yamamoto J (1991) Emergence of symmetry in visual conditional discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychol Rep 68:51–60
Ullman S (1989) Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition. Cognition 32:193–254
Urcuioli PJ (1990) Some relationships between outcome expectancies and sample stimulus in pigeons’ delayed matching. Anim Learn Behav 18:302–314
Urcuioli PJ (1996) Acquired equivalences and mediated generalization in pigeon’s matching-to-sample. In: Zentall TR, Smeets PM (eds) Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 55–70
Urcuioli PJ, Zentall TR, Jackson-Smith P, Steirn JN (1989) Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: retention, intertriai interference, and transfer. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 15:264–273
Urcuioli PJ, Zentall TR, DeMarse T (1995) Transfer to derived sample-comparison relations by pigeons following many-to-one versus one-to-many matching with identical training relations. QJ Exp Psychol 48B:158–178
Vauclair J, Fagot J, Hopkins WD (1993) Rotation of mental images in baboons when the visual input is directed to the left cerebral hemisphere. Psychol Sci 4:99–103
Vaughan W (1988) Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:36–42
Wasserman EA (1995) The conceptual abilities of pigeons. Am Sci 83:246–255
Wasserman EA, Astley SL (1994) A behavioral analysis of concepts: its application to pigeons and children. In: Medin DL (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press, New York
Wasserman EA, Tassinary LG, Bhatt RS, Sayasenh P (1989) Pigeons can discriminate emotional expression and individual identity from photographs of the human face. Presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Atlanta, GA
Wasserman EA, DeVolder CL, Coppage DJ (1992) Nonsimilarity-based conceptualization in pigeons via secondary or mediated generalization. Psychol Sci 3:374–379
Wasserman EA, Gagliardi JL, Astley SL, Cook BR, Kirkpatrick-Steger K, Biederman I (1996) The pigeon’s recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 22:205–221
Watanabe S (1993) Object-picture equivalence in the pigeon: an analysis with natural concept and pseudo-concept discriminations. Behav Process 30:225–232
Winner H, Ettlinger E (1978) Do chimpanzees recognize photographs as representations of objects? Neuropsychologia 17:413–420
Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations. Macmillan, New York
Yamamoto J, Asano T (1995) Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Psychol Rec 45:3–21
Zentall TR (1998) Symbolic representation in animals: emergent stimulus relations in conditional discrimination learning. Anim Learn Behav 26:363–377
Zentall TR, Urcuioli PJ, Jagielo JA, Jackson-Smith P (1989) Interaction of sample dimension and sample-comparison mapping on pigeons’ performance of delayed conditional discriminations. Anim Learn Behav 17:172–178
Zentall TR, Steirn JN, Sherburne LM, Urcuioli PJ (1991) Common coding in pigeons assessed through partial versus total reversals of many-to-one conditional discrimination. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 17:194–201
Zentall TR, Sherburne LM, Steirn JN (1992) Development of excitatory backward associations during the establishment of forward associations in a delayed conditional discrimination by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 20:199–206
Zentall TR, Sherburne LM, Urcuioli PJ (1993) Common coding in a many-to-one delayed matching task as evidenced by facilitation and interference effect. Anim Learn Behav 21:233–237
Zentall TR, Sherburne LM, Urcuioli PJ (1995) Coding of hedonic and nonhedonic samples by pigeons in many-to-one delayed matching. Anim Learn Behav 23:189–196
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jitsumori, M., Delius, J.D. (2008). Object Recognition and Object Categorization in Animals. In: Matsuzawa, T. (eds) Primate Origins of Human Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-09423-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-09423-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-09422-7
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-09423-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive