Skip to main content

Object Recognition and Object Categorization in Animals

  • Chapter
Primate Origins of Human Cognition and Behavior

Abstract

One of the most important attributes of cognitive activities in both human and nonhuman animals is the ability to recognize individual objects and to categorize a variety of objects that share some properties. Wild-living spider monkeys, for example, individually recognize their partners and a large number of other con-specifics quickly and accurately regardless of their highly variable spatial attitudes and also discriminate them from other species (J. Delius, personal observation). Object recognition and object categorization are both equally vital for most of the advanced animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson JA, Hinton GE (1981) Models of information processing in the brain. In: Hinton GE, Anderson A (eds) Parallel models of associative memory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 9–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby FG, Maddox WT (1998) Stimulus categorization. In: Birnbaum MH (ed) Measurement, judgment, and decision making: handbook of perception and cognition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 251–301

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Astley SL, Wasserman EA (1992) Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons: all negative stimuli are not created equal. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 18:193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astley SL, Wasserman EA (1998) Novelty and functional equivalence in superordinate categorization by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 26:125–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Astley SL, Wasserman EA (1999) Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 25:415–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin A, Pearce JM (1994) Prototype effects in categorization by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 20:264–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovet D, Vauclair J (1998) Functional categorization of objects and of their pictures in baboons (Papio anubis). Learn Motiv 29:309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw RH, Dawkins MS (1993) Slides of conspecifics as representatives of real animals in laying hens (Gallus domesticus). Behav Process 28:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabe PA, Healey ML (1979) Figure-background color differences and transfer of discrimination from objects to line drawings with pigeons. Bull Psychon Soc 13:124–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerella J (1977) Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon. Pattern Recogn 9:65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerella J (1990a) Pigeon pattern perception: limits on perspective invariance. Perception 19:141–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerella J (1990b) Shape constancy in the pigeon: the perspective transformations decomposed. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Kosslyn SM, Mumford DB (eds) Quantitative analysis of behavior: behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation, vol 8. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 145–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole PD, Honig WL (1994) Transfer of a discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) between pictured locations and the represented environments. J Comp Psychol 108:189–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RG, Katz JS (1999) Dynamic object perception by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 25:194–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato MR, Sant PV (1988) The person concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato MR, Salmon DP, Loukas E, Tomie A (1985) Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). J Exp Anal Behav 44:35–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delius JD (1992) Categorical discrimination of objects and pictures by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 20:301–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Delius JD, Hollard VD (1995) Orientation invariance in pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. J Comp Psychol 109:278–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delius JD, Emmerton J, Hörster W, Jäger R, Ostheim J (1999) Picture-object recognition in pigeons. Current Psychology of Cognition 18:621–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Dépy D, Fagot J, Vauclair J (1997) Categorization of three-dimensional stimuli by humans and baboons: search for prototype effects. Behav Process 39:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman S, Bülthoff HH (1992) Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Res 32:2385–2400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA, Jagielo JA, Zentall TR, Hogan DE (1982) Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in matching to sample by pigeons: mediation by reinforcer-specific expectancies. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 8:244–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerton J (1983) Vision. In: Abs M (ed) Physiology and behavior of the pigeon. Academic Press, London, pp 245–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans CS, Macedonia JM, Marler P (1993) Effects of apparent size and speed on the response of chickens, Gallus gallus, to computer-generated stimulations of aerial predators. Anim Behav 46:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fersen von L, Lea SEG (1990) Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features. J Exp Anal Behav 54:69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields L, Verhave T, Fath SJ (1984) Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: a methodological analysis. J Exp Anal Behav 42:143–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fields L, Landon-Jimenez V, Buffington DM, Adams BJ (1995) Maintained nodal-distance effects in equivalence classes. J Exp Anal Behav 64:129–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita K, Matsuzawa T (1986) A new procedure to study perceptual world on animals with sensory reinforcement: recognition of humans by a chimpanzee. Primates 27:283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman D, Homa D (1997) Integrative and metric properties of abstracted information as a function of category discriminability, instance variability, and experience. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 3:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks J (1966) Flicker threshold as determined by a modified conditioned suppression procedure. J Exp Anal Behav 9:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herbranson WT, Fremouw T, Shimp CP (1999) The randomization procedure in the study of categorization of multidimensional stimuli by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 25:113–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herman LM, Pack AA, Morris-Samuels P (1993) Representational and conceptual skills of dolphins. In: Roitblat HL, Herman LM, Nachtigall PE (eds) Language and communication: comparative perspectives. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 403–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ (1985) Riddles of natural categorization. Philos Trans R Soc B 308:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ (1990) Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach. Cognition 37:133–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH (1964) Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science 146:549–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH, Cable C (1976) Natural concepts in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2:285–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollard DV, Delius DJ (1982) Rotation invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. Science 218:804–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins WD, Fagot J, Vauclair J (1993) Mirror-image matching and mental rotation problem solving in baboons (Papio papio): unilateral input enhance performance. J Exp Psychol Gen 122:61–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huber L, Lenz R (1993) A test of the linear feature model of polymorphous concept discrimination with pigeons. Q J Exp Psychol 46B:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber L, Lenz R (1996) Categorization of prototypical stimulus classes by pigeons. Q J Exp Psychol 48:134–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson I, Sidman M, Carrigan P (1986) Stimulus definition in conditional discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav 45:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jitsumori M (1993) Category discrimination of artificial polymorphous stimuli based on feature learning. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 19:244–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jitsumori M (1994) Discrimination of artificial polymorphous categories by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatto). Q J Exp Psychol 47:371–386

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jitsumori M (1996) A prototype effects and categorization of artificial polymorphous stimuli in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 22:405–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jitsumori M, Matsuzawa T (1991) Picture perception in monkeys and pigeons: transfer of rightside-up versus upside-down discrimination of photographic objects across conceptual categories. Primates 32:473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jitsumori M, Ohkubo O (1996) Orientation discrimination and categorization of photographs of natural objects by pigeons. Behav Process 38:205–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jitsumori M, Yoshihara M (1997) Categorical discrimination of human facial expressions by pigeons: a test of the linear feature model. Q J Exp Psychol 50B:253–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Jitsumori M, Natori M, Okuyama K (1999) Recognition of moving video images of conspecifics by pigeons: effects of individuals, static and dynamic motion cues, and movement. Anim Learn Behav 27:303–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller FS, Schoenfeld WN (1950) Principles of psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AG, Anderson JA (1984) Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 10(4):616–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuno H, Kitadate H, Iwamoto T (1994) Formation of transitivity in conditional matching to sample by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 62:399–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lea SEG (1984) In what sense do pigeons learn concepts? In: Roitblat HL, Bever T, Terrace HS (eds) Animal cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 263–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea SEG, Harrison SN (1978) Discrimination of polymorphous stimulus sets by pigeons. Q J Exp Psychol 30:521–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea SEG, Ryan CME (1983) Feature analysis of pigeons’ acquisition of concept discrimination. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Wagner AR (eds) Quantitative analysis of behavior: discrimination processes, vol 4. Ballinger, Cambridge, pp 263–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea SEG, Ryan CME (1990) Unnatural concepts and the theory of concept discrimination in birds. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Kosslyn S, Mumford D (eds) Quantitative analysis of behavior: behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation, vol 8. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 165–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea SEG, Lohmann A, Ryan CME (1993) Discrimination of five-dimensional stimuli by pigeons: limitations of feature analysis. Q J Exp Psychol 46:19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkens R, Kop PFM, Matthijs W (1988) A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 49:395–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann A, Delius JD, Hollard VD, Friesel M (1988) Discrimination of shape reflections and shape orientations by Columba livia. J Comp Psychol 102:3–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden EA (1977) Generalization of an operant response to photographs and drawing/silhouettes of a three-dimensional object at various orientations. Bull Psychon Soc 10:405–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ (1995) Categorization by people and pigeons: the twenty-second Bartlett memorial lectures. Q J Exp Psychol 48B(3):193–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Makino H, Jitsumori M (in press) Category learning and prototype effect in pigeons: a study by using morphed images of human faces. Jpn J Psychol (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntire KD, Cleary J, Thompson T (1987) Conditional relations by monkeys: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. J Exp Anal Behav 47:279–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McQuoid LM, Galef BF Jr (1993) Social stimuli influencing feeding behavior of Burmese fowl: a video analysis. Anim Behav 46:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RJ (1973) Cross-cultural research in the perception of pictorial materials. Psychol Bull 80:135–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann PG (1974) An attribute frequency model for the abstraction of prototypes. Mem Cogn 2:241–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann PG (1977) Visual prototype information with discontinuous representation of dimensions of variability. Mem Cogn 5:187–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson-Kane E, Nicol CJ, Foster TM, Temple W (1997) Limited perception of video images by domestic hens. Anim Behav 53:951–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell RW (1967) The pulse-to-cycle fraction as a determinant of critical flicker fusion in the pigeon. Psychol Rec 17:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Rips L (1994) The psychology of proof: deductive reasoning in human thinking. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts WA (1996) Stimulus generalization and hierarchical structure in categorization by animals. In: Zentall TR, Smeets PM (eds) Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 35–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts WA, Mazmanian DS (1988) Concept learning at different levels of abstraction by pigeons, monkeys, and people. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan CME, Lea SEG (1994) Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds. Behav Process 33:155–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sands SF, Lincoln CE, Wright AA (1982) Pictorial similarity judgments and the organization of visual memory in the rhesus monkey. J Exp Psychol Gen 3:369–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Rumbaugh DM, Smith ST, Lawson J (1980) Reference: the linguistic essential. Science 210:922–925

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Pate JL, Lawson J, Smith ST, Rosenbaum S (1983) Can a chimpanzee make a statement? J Exp Psychol Gen 112:457–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrier AM, Brady PM (1987) Categorization of natural stimuli by monkeys (Macaca mulatta): effects of stimulus set size and modification of exemplars. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 13:136–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schrier AM, Angarella R, Povar ML (1984) Studies of concept formation by stumptailed monkeys: concepts humans, monkeys, and letter A. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 10:564–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schusterman RJ, Kastak D (1993) A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. Psychol Rec 43:823–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Schyns PG (1991) A modular neural network model of concept acquisition. Cogn Sci 15:461–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171:701–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman M (1994) Equivalence relations and behavior: a research story. Authors Cooperative, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman M, Tailby W (1982) Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav 37:5–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman M, Rauzin R, Lazar R, Cunningham S, Tailby W, Carrigan P (1982) A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. J Exp Anal Behav 37:23–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steirn JN, Jackson-Smith P, Zentall TR (1991) Mediational use of internal representations of food and no-food events by pigeons. Learn Motiv 22:353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolan JC, Rogers CM, Malone DR (1981) Cross-modal matching in monkeys: altered visual cues and delay. Neuropsychologia 19:289–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomonaga M, Matsuzawa T, Fujita K, Yamamoto J (1991) Emergence of symmetry in visual conditional discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychol Rep 68:51–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman S (1989) Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition. Cognition 32:193–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli PJ (1990) Some relationships between outcome expectancies and sample stimulus in pigeons’ delayed matching. Anim Learn Behav 18:302–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli PJ (1996) Acquired equivalences and mediated generalization in pigeon’s matching-to-sample. In: Zentall TR, Smeets PM (eds) Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 55–70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli PJ, Zentall TR, Jackson-Smith P, Steirn JN (1989) Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: retention, intertriai interference, and transfer. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 15:264–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli PJ, Zentall TR, DeMarse T (1995) Transfer to derived sample-comparison relations by pigeons following many-to-one versus one-to-many matching with identical training relations. QJ Exp Psychol 48B:158–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Vauclair J, Fagot J, Hopkins WD (1993) Rotation of mental images in baboons when the visual input is directed to the left cerebral hemisphere. Psychol Sci 4:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan W (1988) Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman EA (1995) The conceptual abilities of pigeons. Am Sci 83:246–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman EA, Astley SL (1994) A behavioral analysis of concepts: its application to pigeons and children. In: Medin DL (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman EA, Tassinary LG, Bhatt RS, Sayasenh P (1989) Pigeons can discriminate emotional expression and individual identity from photographs of the human face. Presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman EA, DeVolder CL, Coppage DJ (1992) Nonsimilarity-based conceptualization in pigeons via secondary or mediated generalization. Psychol Sci 3:374–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman EA, Gagliardi JL, Astley SL, Cook BR, Kirkpatrick-Steger K, Biederman I (1996) The pigeon’s recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 22:205–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S (1993) Object-picture equivalence in the pigeon: an analysis with natural concept and pseudo-concept discriminations. Behav Process 30:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner H, Ettlinger E (1978) Do chimpanzees recognize photographs as representations of objects? Neuropsychologia 17:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto J, Asano T (1995) Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Psychol Rec 45:3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall TR (1998) Symbolic representation in animals: emergent stimulus relations in conditional discrimination learning. Anim Learn Behav 26:363–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall TR, Urcuioli PJ, Jagielo JA, Jackson-Smith P (1989) Interaction of sample dimension and sample-comparison mapping on pigeons’ performance of delayed conditional discriminations. Anim Learn Behav 17:172–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall TR, Steirn JN, Sherburne LM, Urcuioli PJ (1991) Common coding in pigeons assessed through partial versus total reversals of many-to-one conditional discrimination. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 17:194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zentall TR, Sherburne LM, Steirn JN (1992) Development of excitatory backward associations during the establishment of forward associations in a delayed conditional discrimination by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 20:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall TR, Sherburne LM, Urcuioli PJ (1993) Common coding in a many-to-one delayed matching task as evidenced by facilitation and interference effect. Anim Learn Behav 21:233–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall TR, Sherburne LM, Urcuioli PJ (1995) Coding of hedonic and nonhedonic samples by pigeons in many-to-one delayed matching. Anim Learn Behav 23:189–196

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jitsumori, M., Delius, J.D. (2008). Object Recognition and Object Categorization in Animals. In: Matsuzawa, T. (eds) Primate Origins of Human Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-09423-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-09423-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-09422-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-09423-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics