Skip to main content
  • 458 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter so far has examined in detail the overarching research question of the dissertation, i.e., to what extent does the current EU institutional framework provide an effective and efficient solution for FDI policy competition between governments under changing conditions for global foreign direct investment as well as current and future rounds of EU enlargement. The last section will summarize the arguments that support the thesis that institutional governance instruments of FDI policy competition in the EU are overstretched and in need of reform, and suggest potential normative solutions to overcome these institutional weaknesses. The chapter will conclude by reviewing the global context surrounding this policy agenda, which shall also serve as segue into the political economy of FDI policy competition presented in the following Chapter 5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. OMAN (2000), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See UNCTAD (2003a), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. WILLIAMSON (2000), p. 610.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See YOUNG/ TAVARES (2004), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See OECD (2001), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See EU (2004c), pp. 4–8 for a detailed discussion.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See EU (2002b), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See EU (2004c), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See IBEX (2003), pp. 7-8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. EU (2003a), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See EU (2003a), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See IBEX (2003), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See RAINES/ BROWN (1999), p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See EU (2003a), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See PIGGOTT (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See UNCTAD (2003), p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  17. UNCTAD (2003), p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See UNCTAD (2003), p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See BREWER (1993), p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  20. SIEBERT (2003), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See, for example, YOUNG/ BREWER (2003); SAUVE/ WILKIE (2000); BREWER/ YOUNG (2000); GRAHAM (1996a); UNCTAD (1996a).

    Google Scholar 

  22. For a dissenting view on the merits of a multilateral investment framework see, for example, FERRARINI (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  23. See, for example, WORLD BANK (2003a).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Only 30 host countries in total accounted for about 95 percent of all FDI inflows, and less than 30 home countries accounted for 99 percent of all outward investment flows in 2002 (see WORLD BANK, 2003; UNCTAD, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. YOUNG/ TAVERES (2004), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See YOUNG/ TAVERES (2004), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Institutional Issues and Policy Implications. In: Locational Tournaments in the Context of the EU Competitive Environment. DUV. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9109-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics