Skip to main content

Effects of Slim and Heavy Advertising Models on Appearance, Self-Esteem and Product Evaluations

  • Chapter
Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. III)

Part of the book series: European Advertising Academy ((EAA))

Abstract

There is no doubt that thinness is a determinant of physical attractiveness of individuals in Western societies. However, in the recent past, a debate existed about whether very slim models should be depicted in magazines and used in advertisements. Researchers articulated concerns about negative effects resulting from a slim-is-beautiful stereotype that could have been learnt if slim models are depicted in the context of beauty and life-style products. These negative effects exist if young average-sized females are dissatisfied with their figure and thus take unhealthy measures to approach to a very low body weight. Grove et al. (2003) even postulated that a slim figure is one aspect for women to define their value. Empirical literature provides support to the hypothesis that extremely slim advertising models reduce young females’ appearance self-esteem. Moreover, this phenomenon is often associated with eating disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, M. J. and G. A. Churchill (1977), “The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations,” in:Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 538–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, A. B. (2001), “Highly Attractive Models in Advertising and the Women Who Loathe Them: The Implications of Negative Affect for Spokesperson Effectiveness,” in:Journal of Advertising,30(3), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1971), “The Attraction Paradigm”, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, T. F.; Fleming, E. C.; Alindogan, J.; Steadman, L. and A. Whitehead (2002), “Beyond Body Image as a Trait: The Development and Validation of the Body Image States Scale,” in:Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 10(2), 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S. (1979), “Communicator Physical Attractiveness and Persuasion,” in:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1387–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Alessandro, S. and B. Chitty (2011), “Real or Relevant Beauty? Body Shape and Endorser Effects on Brand Attitude and Body Image,” in:Psychology & Marketing, 28(8), 843–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrichs, P. C. and C. Lee (2011), “Waif Goodbye! Average-size Female Models Promote Positive Body Image and Appeal to Consumers,” in:Psychology and Health, 26(10), 1273–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dion, K. K.; Berscheid, E. and E. Walster (1972), “What is Beautiful is Good,” in:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954), “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes,” in:Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, S.; Ward, L. M. and J. S. Hyde (2008), “The Role of the Media in Body Image Concerns Among Women: A Meta-analysis of Experimental and Correlational Studies,” in:Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groesz, L. M.; Levine, M. P. and S. K. Murnen (2002), “The Effect of Experimental Presentation of Thin Media Images on Body Satisfaction: A Meta-analytic Review,” in:International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V. P.; Keel, P. K. and J. P. Mitchell (2003), “Gender Differences in Implicit Weight Identity,” in:International Journal of Eating Disorders, 34(1), 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, M. and D. Trampe (2009), “When Thinking is Beneficial and When it is not: The Effects of Thin and Round Advertising Models,” in:Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(4), 619–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliwell, E. and H. Dittmar (2004), “Does Size Matter? The Impact of Model’s Body Size on Women’s Body-focused Anxiety and Advertising Effectiveness,” in:Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(1), 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heatherton, T. F. and J. Polivy (1991), “Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring State Self-esteem,” in:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 895–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. (1948), “Adaptation-level as a Basis for a Quantitative Theory of Frames of Reference,” in:Psychological Review, 55(6), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, L. R. and P. M. Homer (1985), “Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective,” in:Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 954–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamins, M. A. (1990), “An Investigation into the "Match-up” Hypothesis in Celebrity Advertising: When Beauty May Be Only Skin Deep,” in:Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loken, B. and J. Peck (2005), “The Effects of Instructional Frame on Female Adolescents’ Evaluations of Larger Sized Female Models in Print Advertising,” in:Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(4), 850–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. A. S.; Veer, E. and S. J. Pervan (2007), “Self-referencing and Consumer Evaluations of Larger-sized Female Models: A Weight Locus of Control Perspective,” in:Marketing Letters,18(3), 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohanian, R. (1991), “The Impact of Celebrity Spokespersons’ Perceived Image on Consumers’ Intention of Purchase,” in:Journal of Advertising Research, 31(1), 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. and B. Loken (2004), “When Will Larger-sized Female Models in Advertisements Be Viewed Positively? The Moderating Role of Instructional Frame, Gender, and Need for Cognition,” in:Psychology & Marketing, 21(6), 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. L.; Thompson, J. K.; Brannick, M. T. and W. P. Sacco (1991), “Development and Validation of the Physical Appearance State and Trait Anxiety Scale (PASTAS),” in:Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 5(4), 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. L. (1991), “Social Comparison and the Idealized Images of Advertising,” in:Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozen, I. T. M. (2011), “Do Female Models Have to Be Size 34 to Promote Beauty Products?” in:Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the European Marketing Academy (EMAC), Ljubljana, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeesters, D. and N. Mandel (2006), “Positive and Negative Media Image Effects on the Self,” in:Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 576–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeesters, D.; Mussweiler, T. and N. Mandel (2010), “The Effects of Thin and Heavy Media Images on Overweight and Underweight Consumers: Social Comparison Processes and Behavioral Implications,” in:Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 930–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trampe, D.; Stapel, D. A.; Siero, F. W. and H. Mulder (2010), “Beauty as a Tool: The Effect of Model Attractiveness, Product Relevance, and Elaboration Likelihood on Advertising Effectiveness,” in:Psychology & Marketing, 27(12), 1101–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westover, M. L. and Q. Randle (2009), “Endorser Weight and Perceptions of Brand Attitude and Intent to Purchase,” in:Journal of Promotion Management, 15(1/2), 57–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hüttl, V., Gierl, H. (2012). Effects of Slim and Heavy Advertising Models on Appearance, Self-Esteem and Product Evaluations. In: Eisend, M., Langner, T., Okazaki, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. III). European Advertising Academy. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4291-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics