Skip to main content
  • 851 Accesses

Abstract

In the following, NMR and NQR measurements in the superconducting state of underdoped and optimally-doped LaO1−xF x FeAs with x = 0.05, x = 0.075 and x = 0.1 will be shown and discussed within possible gap symmetries. The presentation of the data is focussed on dynamic properties. Spin-lattice relaxation rate data for x = 0.05, x = 0.075 and x = 0.1 will be shown and analysed in Section 7.1. Section 7.2 reports the special case of LaO0.9F0.1FeAs1−δ, an optimally-doped sample with additional impurities (arsenic vacancies), exhibiting slightly enhanced superconducting properties and an even sharper decrease of T-11 than optimally-doped LaO0.9F0.1FeAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that within the sample series grown in the IFW Dresden, the sample with a nominal fluorine doping of \( x = 0.04 \) is not superconducting, but displays a structural and a magnetic phase transition at \( {T_s} = 151{\rm{K}} \) and \( {T_N} = 120{\rm{K}} \), respectively [135]. The LaO0.96F0.04FeAs sample displayed in Fig. 7.1 was grown in Hosono’s group [168].

  2. 2.

    The impurity strength is given by \( \sigma =\frac{{{(\pi N(0)v)}^{2}}}{1+{{(\pi N(0)v)}^{2}}} \) where N(0) is the density of states at the Fermienergy and v is the impurity potential [176].

  3. 3.

    The impurity scattering rate is given by \( {\gamma _{{\rm{interband}}}} = 0.8{\Delta _0} \), where ∆0 is the superconducting energy gap at low temperature without impurity scattering [176]

  4. 4.

    Please refer to Appendix A.3 for a discussion of the use of the stretching exponent λ.

  5. 5.

    Since Eq. (7.2) contains 8 parameters, the robustness of the fit was checked by fixing different parameters to reasonable values during different fitting sessions. For instance at a first run w was fixed to 0.81 and at a second run T 1s was fixed to 220ms. T 1sc resulted to be the same within error bars for all different checks. During the first run, T 1s lay in between 100 and 450 ms and during the second check w varied between 0.65 and 0.81, which are realistic values.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Vieweg+Teubner Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hammerath, F. (2012). NMR and NQR on LaO1−xF x FeAs in the Superconducting State. In: Magnetism and Superconductivity in Iron-based Superconductors as Probed by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-2423-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics