Abstract
The paper uses longitudinal data from a sample of 142 Italian family firms to examine how a firm’s decisions of strategic relevance – like the introduction of a new product and the founder succession – are affected by short-term external factors and firm-specific factors. The empirical analysis exploits the advantages of a conditional risk set duration model, which allows taking into account the multiple ordered occurrences of similar failures (multiple product introductions and successions) during the company life.
Econometric evidence shows that both product introduction and succession are delayed by a recession and that the probability for these events to occur increases as the negative effect of downturns tend to vanish, but at different rates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams R, Almeida H, Ferreira D (2009) Understanding the relationship between founder-CEOs and firm performance. J Empirical Finance 16:136–150
Álvarez R, Benavente JM, Crespi G (2006) Does economic crisis spur organizational change? Evidence from Chilean manufacturing plants, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=940400
Alvarez R, Görg H (2009) Multinationals and plant exit: evidence from Chile. Int Rev Econ Finance 18(1):45–51, January
Anderson R, Reeb D (2003) Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. J Finance 58:1301–1328
Arundel, A., Kabla, I. (1998) What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms, Research Policy 27:127–141
Becheikh N, Landry R, Armara N (2006) Lessons from innovation empirical studies in manufacturing sector: a systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003. Technovation 26:644–664
Bernard A, Redding S, Schoot P (2010) Multi-products firms and products switching. Am Econ Rev 100(2):444–448
Bhattacharjee A, Higson C, Holly S, Kattuman P (2007) Macroeconomic conditions and business exit: determinants of failures and acquisitions of UK firms. Center for dynamic macroeconomic analysis working paper series, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract==1011737
Caballero R, Hammour M (1994) The cleansing effect of recessions. Am Econ Rev 84(5):1350–1368
Cleves MA (1999) Analysis of multiple failure-time survival data. http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/stmfail.html
Cleves MA, Gould W, Gutierrez RG (2004) An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. Stata Press, College Station
Corsino M (2008) Product innovation and growth: the case of integrated circuits. LEM working paper 2008–02, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa
Cucculelli M, Micucci G (2008) Family succession and firm performance: evidence from Italian family firms. J Corp Finance 14(1):17–31
Davis S, Haltiwanger JC (1992) Gross job creation, gross job destruction, and employment reallocation. Quar J Econ 107(3):819–863, August
Devinney TM (1990) New products over the business cycle. J Prod Innovat Manag 7:261–273
Flor ML, Oltra MJ (2004) Identification of innovating firms through technological innovation indicators: an application to the Spanish ceramic tile industry. Res Policy 33:323–336
Freeman C. Soete L. Townsend J. (1982) Fluctuations in the Numbers of Product and Process Innovations 1920–1980, Paper for the OECD Workshop on Patent and Innovation Statistics, June 28–30, Paris
Geroski P, Mazzucato M (2002) Learning and the sources of corporate growth. Ind Corp Change 11:623–644
Hall BH, Lotti F, Mairesse J (2009) Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy. Small Bus Econ 33:13–33
ISTAT ( 2009) Annual Report, Roma
Kauffman Foundation (2009) The economic future just happened. Kauffman 2009 Fast Facts
Kimhi A (1994) Optimal timing of farm transferal from parent to child. Am J Agr Econ 76:228–236
Kleinknecht A. 1990 “Are there Schumpeterian Waves of Innovations?”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 14, n. 1, pp. 81–92.
Kleinknecht A, Van Montfort K, Brouwer E (2002) The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Econ Innov New Technol 11(2):109–121
Miljkovic D (1999) Optimal timing in the problem of family farm transfer from parent to child: an option value approach. J Dev Econ 61:543–552
Nickell S, Nicolitsas D, Patterson M (2001) Does doing badly encourage management innovation? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, 63(1):5–28
Nishimura K, Nakajima T, Kiyota K (2005) Does the natural selection mechanism still work in severe recessions? Examination of the Japanese economy in the 1990s. J Econ Behav Organ 58(1):53–78
Oulton N. (1987) Plant Closure ad the Productivity Miracle in Manufacturing, National Institute Economic Review, 53–59, August
Wasserman N (2003) Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organ Sci 14:149–172
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cucculelli, M. (2012). Product Innovation and Corporate Governance in Turbulent Times: Evidence from Italian SMEs. In: Calcagnini, G., Favaretto, I. (eds) Small Businesses in the Aftermath of the Crisis. Contributions to Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2852-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2852-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2851-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2852-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)