Skip to main content

Clustering All Three Modes of Three-Mode Data: Computational Possibilities and Problems

  • Conference paper
COMPSTAT 2004 — Proceedings in Computational Statistics

Abstract

For the analysis of three-mode data sets (i.e., data sets pertaining to three different sets of entities) various component analysis techniques are available. These yield components that are summaries of the entities of each mode. Because such components are often interpreted in a more or less binary way in terms of the entities related strongest to them, it seems logical to actually constrain these components to have binary values only.In the present paper, such constrained models are proposed and algorithms for fitting these models are provided. In one of these variants, the components are constrained such that they correspond to nonoverlapping clusters of entities. Finally, a procedure is proposed for steering component values towards binary values, without actually imposing them to be binary, using penalties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carroll J. D., Chang J.-J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of “Eckart-Young ” decomposition. Psychometrika 35, 283–319.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ceulemans E., van Mechelen I., Leenen I. (2003). TuckerЗ hierarchical classes analysis. Psychometrika 68, 413–433.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaturvedi A., Carroll J.D. (1994). An alternating combinatorial optimization approach to fitting INDCLUS and Generalized INDCLUS models. Journal of Classification 11, 155–170.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. DeSarbo, W.S. (1982). GENNCLUS: New models for general nonhierarchical clustering analysis. Psychometrika 47, 449–475.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaul W., Schader, M. (1996). A new algorithm for two-mode clustering. In: Bock H.-H., Polasek W. (eds.) Data analysis and information systems. Springer, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harshman R.A. (1970). Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: models and conditions for an “explanatory ” multi-mode factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 16, 1–84.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaiser H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23, 187–200.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiers H.A.L. (1998). Joint orthomax rotation of the core and component matrices resulting from three-mode principal components analysis. Journal of Classification 15, 245–263.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiers H.A.L. (2000). Towards a standardized notation and terminology in multiway analysis. Journal of Chemometrics 14, 105–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kroonenberg P.M., De Leeuw J. (1980). Principal component analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms. Psychometrika 45, 69–97.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Leenen I., van Mechelen L, de Boeck P., Rosenberg S. (1999). INDCLAS: A three-way hierarchical classes model. Psychometrika 64, 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Penrose R. (1956). On best approximate solutions of linear matrix equations. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 52, 17–19.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Rocci R., Vichi M. (2003). Three-mode clustering of a three-way data set. CLADAG 2003, University of Bologna, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schepers J., Van Mechelen I. (2004). Three-mode partitioning: Method and application. Paper presented at the meeting of the GfKl, Dortmund, March 9-11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ten Berge J.M.F. (1993). Least squares optimization in multivariate analysis. DSWO Press, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tucker L.R. (1966). Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 31, 279–311.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Vichi M. (2001) Double k-means Clustering for simultaneous classification of objects and variables. In: Borra S., Rocci R., Schader M. (eds.): Advances in classification and data analysis, Springer, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kiers, H.A.L. (2004). Clustering All Three Modes of Three-Mode Data: Computational Possibilities and Problems. In: Antoch, J. (eds) COMPSTAT 2004 — Proceedings in Computational Statistics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2656-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2656-2_24

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1554-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2656-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics