Skip to main content

Quality Control of Manufactured Surfaces

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 9

Summary

Recent literature on statistical process monitoring pointed out that the quality of products and processes can be often related to profiles, where the function relating a response to one or more location variables (in time or space) is the quality characteristic of interest. An important application of profile monitoring concerns geometric specifications of mechanical components, such as straightness, roundness or free-form tolerance. This paper presents a new approach aimed at extending the method proposed for profile monitoring to surface monitoring. In this case, a geometric specification (such as cylindricity, flatness, etc.) is assumed to characterize the machined surface. The proposed method is based on combining a Spatial Autoregressive Regression (SARX) model (i.e. a regression model with spatial autoregressive errors) to multivariate and univariate control charting. In this work, the approach is applied to a case study concerning surfaces obtained by turning and subject to cylindricity tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ASME Y14.5-M-1994 “Dimensioning and Tolerancing”.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cho, N.W. and Tu, J.F. (2001). “Roundness Modeling of Machined Parts for Tolerance Analysis”. Precision Engineering, 25, pp. 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colosimo, B. M. and Pacella, M. (2007). “On the Use of Principal Component Analysis to Identify Systematic Patterns in Roundness Profiles”. Quality & Reliability Engineering International, 23(6), pp. 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colosimo, B. M., Pacella, M. and Semeraro Q. (2008). “Statistical Process Control for Geometric Specifications: On the Monitoring of Roundness Profiles”. Journal of Quality Technology, 40(1), pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cressie, N.A.C. (1993). Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ding, Y., Zeng, L. and Zhou, S. (2006). “Phase I Analysis for Monitoring Nonlinear Profiles in Manufacturing Processes”. Journal of Quality Technology, 38, pp. 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henke, R.P., Summerhays, K.D., Baldwin, J.M., Cassou, R.M. and Brown, C.W. (1999). “Methods for Evaluation of Systematic Geometric Deviations in Machined Parts and Their Relationships to Process Variables”. Precision Engineering, 23, pp. 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ISO 1101:2004 - Geometrical Product Specification (GPS) - Cylindricity (ISO/TS 12180:2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jin, J. and Shi, J. (2001). “Automatic Feature Extraction of Waveform Signals for In-Process Diagnostic Performance Improvement”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 12, pp. 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, L. and Albin, S.L. (2000). “On-Line Monitoring When the Process Yields a Linear Profile”. Journal of Quality Technology, 32, pp. 418–426.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, K., Mahmoud, M.A. and Woodall, W.H. (2003). “On the Monitoring of Linear Profiles”. Journal of Quality Technology, 35, pp. 317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  12. LeSage, J.P. (1999). “The Theory and Practice of Spatial Econometrics” Department of Economics University of Toledo, available at http://www.spatialeconometrics. com/.

  13. Mahmoud, M.A. and Woodall, W.H. (2004). “Phase I Analysis of Linear Profiles with Calibration Applications”. Technometrics, 46, pp. 380–391.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, J.D., Woodall, W.H., Birch, J.B. and Sullivan J.H. (2006). “Distribution of Hotellings T2 Statistic Based on the Successive Differences Estimator”. Journal of Quality Technology, 38, pp. 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Woodall, W.H., Spitzner, D.J., Montgomery, D.C. and Gupta, S. (2004). “Using Control Charts to Monitor Process and Product Quality Profiles”. Journal of Quality Technology, 36, pp. 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, X.D., Zhang, C., Wang, B. and Feng, S.C. (2005). “Unified Functional Approach for Precision Cylindrical Components”. International Journal of Production Research, 43, pp. 25–47.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was partially funded by the Ministry of Education, University and Research of Italy (MIUR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bianca Maria Colosimo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Colosimo, B.M., Mammarella, F., Petrò, S. (2010). Quality Control of Manufactured Surfaces. In: Lenz, HJ., Wilrich, PT., Schmid, W. (eds) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 9. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2380-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics