Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

School composition effects in Denmark: quantile regression evidence from PISA 2000

  • Chapter
The Economics of Education and Training

Part of the book series: Studies in Empirical Economics ((STUDEMP))

Abstract

Data from the first wave of the OECD PISA study are combined with register data for Denmark to estimate the effect of the socioeconomic mix of schools on students’ test scores. A major disadvantage of the PISA design for the analysis of school composition effects is the small students-per-school samples. Adding family background data from administrative registers for all same-aged schoolmates of the PISA students helps overcome this. To compensate for endogeneity in the school composition variable, the results are conditioned on a rich set of family and school variables from the PISA data. Quantile regression results suggest differential school composition effects across the conditional reading score distribution, with students in the lower quantiles achieving the largest test score gains. Mathematics results suggest that high- and low-ability students benefit equally from attending schools with a better student intake, and most results for science are only marginally significant. These results imply that mixing students of different home backgrounds could improve equity of achievement for both reading and mathematics; however, the average skill level would improve only for reading literacy. In mathematics, mixing students would not raise average outcomes, because the detrimental effect on students in the higher quantiles would offset positive effects on those in the lower quantiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ammermüller A, Pischke J-S (2006) Peer effects in European primary schools: evidence from PIRLS. IZA discussion paper 2077

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AM, Egelund N, Jensen TP, Krone M, Lindenskov L, Mejding J (2001) Forventninger og frdigheder - danske unge i en international sammenligning, (in Danish with an English summary). akf, DPU, SFI. Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedard K (2003) School quality and the distribution of male earnings in Canada. Econ Educ Rev 22:395-407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts J, Morell D (1999) The determinants of undergraduate grade point average—the relative importance of family background, high school resources, and Peer Group Effects. J Hum Resour 34(2):268-293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts J, Zau A (2004) Peer Groups and academic achievement: panel evidence from administrative data. Public Policy Institute of California. February 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau PM (1960) Structural effects. Am Sociol Rev 25:178-193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boozer MA, Cacciola SE (2001) Inside the “Black Box” of project STAR: estimation of peer effects using experimental data. Discussion Paper No. 832, Economic Growth Center, Yale University

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchinsky M (1994) Changes in the U.S. wage structure 1963-1987: application of quantile regres-sion. Econometrica 62(2):405-458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchinsky M (1998) Recent advances in quantile regression models: a practical guideline for empir- ical research. J Hum Resour 33(1):88-126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreeben R, Barr R (1988) Classroom composition and the design of instruction. Sociol Educ 61:129-142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen G (2002) School composition and achievement in primary education: a large-scale multi- level approach. Stud Educ Eval 28:347-68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eide E, Showalter M (1998) The effect of school quality on student performance: a quantile regres- sion approach. Econ Lett 58:345-350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J Lab Econ 24(1):39-58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein L, Symons J (1999) Attainment in secondary school. Oxford Economic Papers 51, 300-321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzenberger B, Koenker R, Machado JAF (eds.) (2001) Empir Econ 26(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glavind N (2004) Polarisering på boligmarkedet. (Polarization in the housing market.) Arbejder- bevgelsens Erhvervsråd, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould ED, Lavy V, Paserman MD (2004) Does immigration affect the long-term educational outcomes of natives? Quasi-experimental evidence. NBER Working Papers 10844, National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Goux D, Maurin E (2006) Close neighbours matter: neighbourhood effects on early performance at school. IZA Discussion Paper 2095

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DA, Riddell C (2003) Literacy and earnings: an investigation of the interaction of cognitive and unobserved skills in earnings generation. Labour Econ 10:165-184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek EA, Kain, JF, Markman, Jacob M, Rivkin SG (2003) Does peer ability affect student achievement? J Appl Econ 18(5):527-544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Rivkin SG (2004) Why public schools lose teachers. J Hum Resour 39(2):326-356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby C (2000) Peer effects in the classroom: learning from gender and race variation. NBER WP 7867

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummelgaard H, Husted L, Holm A, Baadsgaard M, Olrik B (1995) Etniske minoriteter, integra- tion og mobilitet (Ethnic minorities, integration and mobility.) In Danish. akf Forlaget

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummelgaard H, Husted L (2001) Social og etnisk bestemt bostning - årsager og konsekvenser (Socially and ethnically determined housing.) In Danish. akf Forlaget

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks C, Mayer SE (1990) The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In: Lynn LE, McGeary MGH (eds) Inner-city poverty in the United States. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin J (2001) For whom the reductions count: a quantile regression analysis of class size and peer effects on scholastic achievement. Empir Econ 26:221-246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahard RE, Crain RL (1983) Research on minority achievement in desegregated schools. In: Ros- sell CH, Howley WD (eds) The consequences of school segregation. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, pp 103-127

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Rev Econ Stud 60(3):531—542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski CF (2000) Economic analysis of social interactions. J Econ Perspect 14(3):115—136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan PJ (2003) Peer effects on student achievement: evidence from Chile. Econ Educ Rev 22:131-141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Knowledge and skills for life—first results from PISA 2000. OECD, Paris OECD (2002a) PISA 2000 technical report. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002b) Manual for the PISA 2000 database. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003) Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow. Further Results from PISA 2000. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin SG, Hanushek EA, Kain JF (2005) Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econome- trica 73:417-458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson D, Symons J (2003) Do peer groups matter? Peer groups versus schooling effects on academic achievement. Econ 70:31-53

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: results for Dartmouth Roommates. Q J Econ 116(2):681-704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweis N, Winter-Ebmer R (2007) Peer effects in Austrian Schools. Empir Econ (forthcoming) Shavit Y, Williams RA (1985) Ability grouping and contextual determinants of educational expec- tations in Israel. Am Sociol Rev 50:62-73

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström M, Uusitalo R (2005) School choice and segregation: evidence from an admission reform. IFAU Working Paper Nr. 7/2005. Uppsala, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp M, Lauder H, Robinson T (2002) School composition and peer effects. Int J Educ Res 37:483-504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb NM (1991) Task related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. J Res Math Educ 22:366-389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willms JD (1986) Social class segregation and its relationship to pupils’ examination results in Scotland. Am Sociol Rev 51(2):224-241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson A (1959) Residential segregation of social classes and aspirations of high school boys. Am Sociol Rev 24:836-845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woessmann J (2004) How equal are educational opportunities? family background and student achievement in Europe and the United States. IZA Working Paper No. 1284. Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer RW, Toma EF (2000) Peer effects in private and public schools across countries. J Policy Anal Manage 19(1):75-92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman DJ (2003) Peer effects in academic outcomes: evidence from a natural experiment. Rev Econ Stat 85:9-23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AKF, Danish Institute of Governmental Research, Nyropsgade 37, 1602, Copenhagen V, Denmark

    Beatrice Schindler Rangvid

Authors
  1. Beatrice Schindler Rangvid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

    Christian Dustmann  & Stephen Machin  & 

  2. Department of Economics, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Platz der Alten Synagoge 1, 79085, Freiburg, Germany

    Bernd Fitzenberger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rangvid, B.S. (2008). School composition effects in Denmark: quantile regression evidence from PISA 2000. In: Dustmann, C., Fitzenberger, B., Machin, S. (eds) The Economics of Education and Training. Studies in Empirical Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2022-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation