Skip to main content

Evidential Reasoning in Nuclear Waste Management

  • Chapter
Soft Computing for Risk Evaluation and Management

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 76))

  • 248 Accesses

Abstract

The problem of the management and disposal of nuclear waste is a complex decision making procedure dealing with different types of uncertainty, and relies to a considerable extend to domain experts judgm ent for the formation of rules and the relevant knowledge. The present work proposes a system that provides a generic and flexible way to model and support that decision. Evidence theory and fuzzy sets offe r convenient f ormalisms to handle the uncertain info rmation, and the evidential support logic mechanism is used to capture expert reasoning. For the problem ofupdating the existing knowledge is described an algorithm that extends fuzzy info rmation in the presence of new evidence. An index related to the conceptual distance of the two fuzzy entities can be used as a parameter in the algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin J.F., (1992) Fuzzy and Probabilistic Uncertainties, in Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, S.C. Shapiro, Ed., Wiley, pp. 528–537.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baldwin J.F., Martin T.P. and Pilsworth B.W., (1988) FRIL Manual, Bristol, FRIL Systems Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baldwin J.F., Martin T.P. and Pilsworth B.W., (1995) FRIL Fuzzy and Evidential Reasoning in A. I., Research Stusies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baldwin J.F., Martin T.P. and Tocatlidou A., (1995) “Uncertainty Management in Radioactive Waste Repository Site Assessment”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 74, pp. 81–91. 354

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonano E.J., Cranwell R.M. and Davis P.A., (1989) “Performance Assessment

    Google Scholar 

  6. Methodologies for the Analysis of High Level Nuclear Waste Repositories“, Radioactive Waste Management and the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, 13, pp. 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gallegos D.P. and Bonano E.J., (1993) “Consideration of Uncertainty in Performance Assessment of Radioactive Waste Disposal from an International Regulatory Perspective”, Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 42, pp. 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Horvitz E.J., Heckerman D.E. and Langlotz C.P., (1986) “A Framework for Comparing Alternative Formalisms for Plausible Reasoning”, in 5th National Conference on Artificail Intelligence, Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roxburg I.S., (1987) Geology of High Level Nuclear Waste Disposal, London,Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shafer G., (1976) A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thorne M.C., (1993) “The Use of Expert Opinion in Formulating Conceptual Models of Underground Disposal Systems and the Treatment of Associated Bias”, Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 42, pp. 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tocatlidou A., (1998) “Learning Based Similarity Measurement for Fuzzy Sets”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 13, pp. 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Voegele M.D., Younker J.L. and Alexander D.H., (1989) “Deriving a Site Characterization Program from the Applicable Regulations”, Radioactive Waste Management and the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, 13, pp. 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walker C.A., (1983) Science and Technology of the Sources and Management of Radioactive Waste, in Too Hot to Hnadle? Social and policy Issues in the Management of Radioactive Wastes, C.A. Walker, L.C. Gould, and E.J. Woodhouse, Editors, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weinberg A.M., (1972) “Social Institutions and Nuclear Energy”, Science, 177, pp. 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu J.S., Apostolakis G.E. and Okrent D., (1990) “Uncertainties in System Analysis: Probabilistic Versus Nonprobabilistic Theories”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 30, pp. 163–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H-J. Zimmermann and P. Zysno, (1980) “Latent Connectives in Human Decision Making”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 4, pp. 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tocatlidou, A. (2001). Evidential Reasoning in Nuclear Waste Management. In: Ruan, D., Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M. (eds) Soft Computing for Risk Evaluation and Management. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 76. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1814-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1814-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-00348-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1814-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics