Abstract
After showing the positive role that an institution can play in the learning process, we motivate the intuition for why-in the context of a major change in the environment-the more rigid and strictly specialized an institution is, the longer and more complex the learning process will be of any actor subject to the by-now obsolete institution. In particular, the inductive adaptation of economic actors (firms in our setting) to a new environment (such as the one caused by transition to a market economy) is slowed by the very existence of some institution or organizational setting that had emerged in the original environment as a superior tool of induction.
The author would like to thank Professors K. Velupillai, A. Leijonhufvud, and L. Punzo for their valuable comments on various partial versions of this work. Professor G. Mondello has given strong encouragement and Dr S. Bartolini endured long precious discussions. None of them is responsible for any error contained in this paper which was presented for the first time at the conference on Computing in Economics and Finance, Geneva 1996. A Human Capital and Mobility grant is gratefully acknowledged.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Birner J. (1995) Models of Mind and Society: the Place of Cognitive Psychology in the Economics, Methodology and Social Philosophy of F.A. Hayek. University of Trento, mimeo
Fitoussi J. P., Velupillai K. (1993) Macroeconomic Perspectives. In: Barkai F., Fischer S., Liviatan N. (Eds.) Monetary Theory and Thought. Mc Millan, London
Gallant S. I. (1993) Neural Networks Learning and Expert Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts
Gold M.E. (1965) Limiting Recursion. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 30(1), 28–48
Gold M. E. (1967) Language Identification in the Limit. Information and Control 10, 447–474
Luna F. (1993) Learning in a Computable Setting. UCLA, mimeo
Luna F. (1997) Learning in a Computable Setting: Applications of Gold’s Inductive Model. In: H. Amman et al. (Eds.) Computational Approaches to Economic Problems. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Luna F. (2000) The Emergence of a Firm as a Complex-Problem Solver. Taiwan Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming
Minsky M., Papert S. (1969) Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Nelson R. R. (1994) Economic Growth via the Coevolution of Technology and Institutions. In: Leydesdorff L., Van den Besselaar P. (Eds.) Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory. Pinter Publishers, London
Rustem B., Velupillai K. (1990) Rationality, Computability, and Control. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 14, 419–432
Simon H. A. (1978), Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 68, 2, 1–16
Spear S. E. (1989) Learning Rational Expectations Under Computability Constraints. Econometrica 57(4), 889–910
Velupillai K. (2000) Computable Economics: The Fourth Arne Ryde Lectures. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zambelli S. (1994) Computability and Economic Applications. The Research Program Computable Economics. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Aalborg, Denmark
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Luna, F. (2002). Computable Learning, Neural Networks and Institutions. In: Chen, SH. (eds) Evolutionary Computation in Economics and Finance. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 100. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1784-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1784-3_12
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2512-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1784-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive