Summary
The National Health Service in Great Britain is undergoing radical change particularly with regard to clinical governance, self-regulation, revalidation, career structures and training and patterns of healthcare delivery. All these changes are relevant to risk-control and quality management. This review surveys these generic changes and illustrates the implications for neurosurgery. Neurosurgery in the UK has the opportunity to enhance their patients care by expanding the number of consultants, developing further sub-specialisation and enhancing its training and review and dissemination programmes but only if extra resources are provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett J, Kett-White R, Mendelow AD, Miller JD, Pickard JD, Teasdale GM (1998) Guidelines for the initial management of head injuries: Recommendations from the Society of British Neurological Surgeons. Brit J Neurosurg 12: 349–352
Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Johnston SE (2000) Professionalism: an ideal to be sustained. Lancet 356: 156–159
Freidson E (1994) Professionalism reborn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
General Medical Council (2000) Revalidating doctors: ensuring standards, securing the future (http://www.gmc-uk.org)
NHS Executive (1999) Clinical governance — quality in the new NHS. Published by Department of Health (http://www.doh.nhsweb.nhs.uk/nhs/clingov.htm)
Pickard JD, Bailey S, Sanderson H, Rees M, Garfield J (1990) Steps towards cost benefit analysis of regional neurosurgical care. Brit Med J 301: 629–635
Pickard JD, Jackson S, Addison J, Smielewski P (1995) Implementation of head injury guidelines — where are we after two cycles of regional audit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 59: 206
Response to the General Medical Council Determination on the Bristol Case. The Senate of Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland October 1998
Royal College of Surgeons of England (1999) Report of the working party on the management of patients with head injuries pp 1–65 (http://www.rcseng.ac.uk)
Royal College of Surgeons of England and the British Orthopaedic Association (2000) Better care for the severely injured pp 1–61 (http://www.rcseng.ac.uk)
Seeley HM, Marmaris C, Carroll G, Kellerman J, Pickard JD (2001) Implementing the Glasgow Report on the management of head injuries: The Eastern Region approach (in submission)
The NHS Plan (http://www.nhs.uk/nhsplan)
The Senate of Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland (2000) Consultant Surgeons — Team working in Surgical Practice (http://www.rcsed.ac.uk)
http://www.doh.gov.uk/wfprconsult
Correspondence: Dr. J. D. Pickard, Academic Neurosurgical Unit of University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Rd., Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Wien
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pickard, J.D., Richards, H.K. (2001). Principles of Quality Management in Medicine: The British Concept. In: Steiger, HJ., Uhl, E. (eds) Risk Control and Quality Management in Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 78. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6237-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6237-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7275-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6237-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive