Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 78))

  • 142 Accesses

Summary

Studies of error and adverse events in medicine have brought a growing awareness of the extent of harm to patients. The psychology of human error strongly suggests that individual liability to error is strongly influenced by the conditions and organisation of the working environment and the nature of the task, in particular the complex and inherently uncertain judgements frequently made in medicine. Research into accidents in medicine and other high risk areas has lead to a much broader concept of causation, with less focus on individuals and more on pre-existing organisational factors. These ideas have been adapted to practical use in healthcare in the analysis of adverse events and in working towards developing safer systems of care. The final section of the paper summarises the implications of this approach for healthcare in terms of an overall systems approach, the need for basic information about clinical incidents, the benefits of systematic investigation and analysis, the nature of safety interventions, the need to study success as well as failure and the need to develop an open, safety aware culture in healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chantier C (1999) The role and education of doctors in the delivery of health care. Lancet 353: 1178–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Corrigan J, Kohn L, Donaldson M (1999) To err is human: building a safer healthcare system. Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Leval, MR, Carthey J, Wright DJ, Farewell VT, Reason JT (2000) Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicentre study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119: 661–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hale AR, Wilpert B, Freitag M. (Eds.) 1997. After the event: from accident to organisational learning. Pergamon, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klein G (1998) Sources of power. How people make decisions. MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leape L, Berwick D (2000) Safe healthcare: are we up to it? Br Med J 2000: 320: 725–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reason JT (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Reason JT (2000) Human error: models and management. Br Med J 320: 768–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reason JT (2001) Adverse events: the human factor. In: Vincent CA (ed) Clinical risk management. Enhancing patient safety. British Medical Journal Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stanhope N, Vincent CA, Taylor-Adams S, O’Connor A, Beard R (1997) Applying human factors methods to clinical risk man-agement in obstetrics. Brit J Obstetric Gynaecol 104: 1225–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor-Adams SE, Vincent C, Stanhope N (1999) Applying human factors methods to the investigation and analysis of clinical adverse events. Safety Sci 31: 143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas E, Brennan T (2001) Errors and adverse events in medicine: an overview. In: Vincent CA (ed) Clinical risk management. Enhancing patient safety. British Medical Journal Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vincent CA (1997) Risk, safety and the dark side of quality. BMJ 314: 1775–1776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vincent CA, Taylor-Adams S, Stanhope N (1998) Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ 316: 1154–1157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vincent CA, Taylor-Adams S, Chapman EJ, Hewett D, Prior S, Strange P, Tizzard A (2000) How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: Clinical Risk Unit and Association of Litigation and Risk Management Protocol. BMJ 320: 777–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vincent CA, Taylor-Adams S, Chapman EJ, Hewett D, Prior S, Strange P, Tizzard A (1999) The investigation and analysis of clinical incidents: a protocol. Royal Society of Medicine Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD (1995) The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 163: 458–471

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vincent, C. (2001). Principles of Risk and Safety. In: Steiger, HJ., Uhl, E. (eds) Risk Control and Quality Management in Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 78. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6237-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6237-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7275-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6237-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics