Skip to main content

Auctions — the Big Winner Among Trading Mechanisms for the Internet Economy

  • Chapter
Lectures in E-Commerce

Abstract

Auctions are probably the most important mechanism for dynamic pricing in electronic commerce. Although they constitute a very old mechanism as well, the new popularity has raisen a lot of questions on the appropriate design of an auction mechanism for a particular situation. This chapter describes reasons for auction popularity by setting them into the context of trends in electronic commerce. We then illustrate the main issues in auction design. Our analysis starts with simple single-item auctions, as we can see them in many B2C markets. We then look at the more complex auction designs, which are necessary for B2B markets. For the latter design has to take into account that buyers want to purchase collections of items and services, and that the valuation for winning collections is not simply equal to the sum of valuations of single items. We show how multi-item auction mechanisms can benefit from a synthesis of microeconomic and mathematical optimization models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agorics Inc. (1996) Auctions — going, going, gone. A survey of auction types. Agorics Inc., Los Altos, CA. Available at http://www.agorics.com/new.html (11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barun Sarkar, M., Butler, B., Steinfield, C. (1998) Intermediaries and Cybermediaries: A Continuing Role for Mediating Players in the Electronic Marketplace. JCMC 1(3). Available at http://www.ascusc.org/jcmclvoll/issue3/sarkar.html (11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikchandani S., Ostroy, J. M. (2000) The package assignment model. Working paper. An earlier version is available at http://www.cramton.umd.edu/conference/auctionconference. html (11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, P. J. (1999) Decentralized computation procurement and computational robustness in a smart market. Economic Theory 13: 41–92

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Caplice, C. G. (1996) An Optimisation Based Bidding Process: A New Framework for Shipper-Carrier Relationships. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, E. H. (1971) Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11: 17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsner, F., Müller, R., Wernisch, L. (1997) Trapezoid Graphs and Generalizations, Geomety and Algorithms. Discrete Applied Mathematics 74: 13–32

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fujishima, Y., Leyton-Brown, K., Shoham, Y. (1999) Taming the computational complexity of combinatorial auctions: Optimal and approximate approaches. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’99, Stockholm, Schweden. Morgan Kaufmann. Available at http://robotics.stanford.edu/~kevinlb/(11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, T. (1973) Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41: 617–631

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herschlag, M., Zwick R. (2000) Internet Auctions-a popular and professional literature review. Quarterly J Electronic Commerce 1(2): 161–186. Available athttp://home.ust.hk/~mkzwick/download.html(11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoesel, S. van, Müller, R (2001) Optimization III Electronic Markets: Examples in Combinatorial Auctions. Netnomics 3: 23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, J. M. (1992) On the complexity of scheduling tasks with discrete starting times. Operations Research Letters 12: 293–295

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kennanvision.com (1998) Exchange in the Internet Economy. The Keenan Report No. 1. Available at http://www.keenanvision.com (11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. (1999) Auction Theory-A Guide to the Literature. J Economic Surveys 13(3): 227–286. Available at http://hicks.nuff.ox.ac.uk/economics/people/klemperer.htm (11.12.2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D., O’Cailaghan, L. I., Y. Shoham, Y. (1999) Truth Revelation in Rapid, Approximately, Efficient Combinatorial Auctions. Working Paper, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyton-Brown, K., Pearson, M., Shoham, Y. (2000a) Towards a Universal Test Suite for Combinatorial Auctions. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’00). Available at http://robotics.stanford.edu/~kevinlb/(11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyton-Brown, K., Shoham, Y., Tennenholtz, M. (2000b) An algorithm for multi-unit combinatorial auctions. Proceedings of National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Austin, TX, July 31-August 2. Available at http:// robotics.stanford.edu/~kevinlb/(11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. (1994) Selling Spectrum rights. J Economic Perspectives 8(3): 145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monderer, D., Tennenholtz, M. (1998) Optimal Auctions Revisited. In: Proceedings of AAAI- 98

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, R., Schulz, A. (2000) Combinatorial Auctions from a computational perspective. Working paper, available from the authors

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1979) Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem. Econometrica 47:61–73

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1981) Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6(1): 58–73

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nisan, N. (2000) Bidding and Allocation in Combinatorial Auctions. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-00). Available at http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~noam/ (11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisan, N., Ronen, A. (2000) Computationally Feasible VCG Mechanisms, in -. Available at http://www.cs.huji.ac.ill~noam/ (11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockenfels, A., Roth, A. (2000) Late Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Theory and Evidence from a Natural Experiment on the Internet. Working Paper, Harvard University. Available at http://www.uni-magdeburg.de/vwI3/axel.html (11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, D. C., Ungar, L. H. (2000) Iterative Combinatorial Auctions: Theory and Practice. In: Proceedings of AAAI-00.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, D. C., Ungar, L. H., Foster, D. P. (1999) Accounting for Cognitive Costs in On-line Auction Design. In: Noriega, P., Sierra, C. (eds.) Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce (LNAI 1571). Springer, LNAI 1571, pp. 25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Rassenti S. J., Smith V. L., Bulfin R. L. (1982) A combinatorial auction mechanism for airport time slot allocation. Bell J Economis 13(2): 402–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, M. H., Pekec, A., Harstad, R. M. (1998) Computationally manageable combinatorial auctions. Management Science 44(8): 1131–1147

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm, T. (2000) Approaches to Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions. Decision Support Systems 28(1-2): 165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm, T., Suri, S. (2000) Improved Algorithms for Optimal Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions and Generalizations. Proceedings of National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Austin, TX, July 31-August 2, pp. 90–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2000) Emerging Patterns from the Dynamic Capabilities ofInternet Intermediaries, JCMC 5(3). Available at http://www.ascusc.org/jcmclvoI5/issue3/scott.html (11. 12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiena, S. S. (1998) The Algorithm Design Manual. Springer, The Electronic Library of Science Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennenholtz, M. (2000) Some tractable combinatorial auctions. Proceedings of National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Austin, TX, July 31-August 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. S. (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J Finance 16: 8–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohra R., Vries, S. de, Combinatorial auctions — a survey. Working paper, 2000. Available at http://www.kellogg.nwu.edu/faculry/vohra/htmlres.htm (11.12.2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, M., Walsh, W., Wurman, P., MacKie-Mason J. (1998) Auction protocols for decentralized scheduling. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfstetter, E. (1996) Auctions: An introduction. J. Economic Surveys 10: 367–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Müller, R. (2001). Auctions — the Big Winner Among Trading Mechanisms for the Internet Economy. In: Werthner, H., Bichler, M. (eds) Lectures in E-Commerce. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6213-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6213-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83623-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6213-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics