Skip to main content

„Fair“ ändern? Veränderungsprozesse mittels Führung fair gestalten

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fehlzeiten-Report 2020

Part of the book series: Fehlzeiten-Report ((FEHLREPORT,volume 2020))

Zusammenfassung

Organisationaler Wandel kann die Motivation von Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern beeinträchtigen. Förderlich für die Veränderungsbereitschaft der Beschäftigten ist vor allem ein transformationaler Führungsstil der Führungskräfte. Die betroffenen Personen schätzen auf Basis bisheriger Erfahrungen ein, ob der anstehende Veränderungsprozess fair ablaufen wird. Die Wahrnehmung von Unfairness geht mit höherem Stresserleben und schlechterer Gesundheit einher. Die Uncertainty-Management-Theorie legt nahe, dass Fairness in unsicheren Situationen an Bedeutung gewinnt und insofern ein Mechanismus sein kann, durch den sich Führungsverhalten auf den Umgang mit Veränderungen auswirkt. Vor allem die informationale Fairness sollte durch zeitnahe und umfassende Informationsbereitstellung sowohl mit mehr Veränderungsbereitschaft als auch besserem psychischem Befinden der Beschäftigten einhergehen. In einer Querschnittsstudie mit 243 Beschäftigten bestätigen wir die Annahme, dass transformationale Führung mit mehr Veränderungsbereitschaft und besserer psychischer Gesundheit zusammenhängt. Die interaktionale (insbesondere informationale) Fairness mediierte diesen Zusammenhang vollständig, d. h. adäquate Informationen über anstehende Veränderungen seitens der Führungskraft sind unabdingbar für die Bereitschaft von Beschäftigten, Veränderungen mitzutragen. Praxisrelevante Empfehlungen für interaktionale, prozedurale und distributive Fairness werden gegeben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alamir I, Ayoubi RM, Massoud H, Al Hallak L (2019) Transformational leadership, organizational justice and organizational outcomes. Leadersh Organ Dev J 40:749–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Amis JM, Slack T, Hinings CR (2004) The pace, sequence, and linearity of radical change. AMJ 47:15–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer M, Frese M (2003) Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J Organiz Behav 24:45–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectation. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (1995) Theory of transformational leadership redux. Leadersh Q 6:463–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM, Riggio RE (2005) Transformation leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies RJ, Moag JS (1986) Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BH, Bazerman MH (Hrsg) Research on negotiation in organizations. JAI Press, Greenwich, S 43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin RW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol 1:185–216

    Google Scholar 

  • By RT (2005) Organisational change management: a critical review. J Chang Manag 5:369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Jamison F, Worrall L, Cooper C (2001) Downsizing in Britain and its effects on survivors and their organizations. Anxiety Stress Coping 14:35–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless SA, Wearing AJ, Mann L (2000) A short measure of transformational leadership. J Bus Psychol 14:389–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng GHL, Chan DKS (2008) Who suffers more from job insecurity? A meta-analytic review. Appl Psychol Int Rev 57:272–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen RL (1987) Distributive justice: theory and research. Soc Just Res 1:19–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JA (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J Appl Psychol 86:386–400

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter CO, Ng KY (2001) Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol 86:425–445

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conger JA, Kanungo RN, Menon ST (2000) Charismatic leadership and follower effects. J Organiz Behav 21:747–767

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cuyper N, De Witte H, Vander Elst T, Handaja Y (2010) Objective threat of unemployment and situational uncertainty during restructuring: Associations with perceived job insecurity and strain. J Bus Psychol 25:75–85

    Google Scholar 

  • De Keyser B, Guiette A, Vandenbempt K (2019) On the dynamics of failure in organizational change: A dialectical perspective. Hum Relations https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719884115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte H, De Cuyper N, Handaja Y, Sverke M, Näswall K, Hellgren J (2010) Associations between quantitative and qualitative job insecurity and well-being: A test in Belgian banks. Int Stud Manag Organ 40:40–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Elovainio M, van den Bos K, Linna A, Kivimäki M, Ala-Mursula L, Pentti J, Vahtera J (2005) Combined effects of uncertainty and organizational justice on employee health: testing the uncertainty management model of fairness judgments among Finnish public sector employees. Soc Sci Med 61:2501–2512

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ford JD, Ford LW (1994) Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Acad Manag Rev 19:756–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox S, Spector PE, Miles D (2001) Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. J Vocat Behav 59:291–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigliotti R, Vardaman J, Marshall DR, Gonzalez K (2019) The role of perceived organizational support in individual change readiness. J Chang Manag 19:86–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold DM, Fedor DB, Caldwell S, Liu Y (2008) The effects of transformational and change leadership on employees’ commitment to a change: a multilevel study. J Appl Psychol 93:346–357

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann D, Felfe J, Hardt J (2012) Transformationale Führung und Veränderungsbereitschaft: Stressoren und Ressourcen als relevante Kontextbedingungen. Z Arbeits Organisationspsychol 56:70–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstad T, Rigotti T, Otto K (2013) Prozedurale Fairness als Mediator zwischen transformationaler Führung und psychischer Beanspruchung am Arbeitsplatz: Eine Mehrebenenstudie. Z Arbeits Organisationspsychol 57:163–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt DT, Armenakis AA, Feild HS, Harris SG (2007) Readiness for organizational change: the systematic development of a scale. J Appl Behav Sci 43:232–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampa J, Rigotti T, Otto K (2017) Mechanisms linking authentic leadership to emotional exhaustion: the role of procedural justice and emotional demands in a moderated mediation approach. Ind Health 55:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernan MC, Hanges PJ (2002) Survivor reactions to reorganization. Antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. J Appl Psychol 87:916–928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kieselbach T, Triomphe CE (2010) Health in restructuring. Hampp, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki M, Honkonen T, Wahlbeck K, Elovainio M, Pentti J, Klaukka T, Virtanen M, Vahtera J (2007) Organisational downsizing and increased use of psychotropic drugs among employees who remain in employment. J Epidemiol Community Health 61:154–158

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter JP (1996) Leading change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics: concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Hum Relations 1:5–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Li A, Cropanzano R (2009) Do East Asians respond more/less strongly to organizational justice than North Americans? A meta-analysis. Jour of Manage Stud 46:787–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind EA (2001) Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In: Greenberg J, Cropanzo R (Hrsg) Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford University Press, Stanford, S 56–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizar AA, Mangundjaya WL, Rachmawan A (2015) The role of psychological capital and psychological empowerment on individual readiness for change. J Dev Areas 49:343–352

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon DP (2008) Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier GW, Streicher B, Jonas E, Woschee R (2007) Gerechtigkeitseinschatzungen in Organisationen. Diagnostica 53:97–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel A, Stegmaier R, Meiser D, Sonntag K (2009) Der Elfenbeinturm öffnet sich – Veränderungsprozesse im Hochschulbereich: Werden Commitment to Change und Person-Organisations-Passung durch Prozessmerkmale bestimmt? Zeitschrift Für Pers 8:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller TQ, Smith TW, Turner CW, Guijarro ML, Hallet AJ (1996) A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychol Bull 119:322–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr G (1991) Fünf Subkonstrukte psychischer Befindensbeeintrachtigungen bei Industriearbeitern: Auswahl und Entwicklung. In: Greif S, Bamberg E, Semmer N (Hrsg) Psychischer Stress am Arbeitsplatz. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr G, Rigotti T, Müller A (2005) Irritation - ein Instrument zur Erfassung psychischer Beanspruchung im Arbeitskontext. Skalen- und Itemparameter aus 15 Studien. Z Arbeits Organisationspsychol 49:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann SE, Bennett N (2000) A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of multilevel model. Acad Man J 43:881–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreg S, Berson Y (2019) Leaders’ impact on organizational change: Bridging theoretical and methodological chasms. Acad Manag Ann 13:272–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto K, Baumert A, Bobocel DR (2011a) Cross-cultural preferences for distributive justice principles: resource type and uncertainty management. Soc Just Res 24:255–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto K, Hoffmann-Biencourt A, Mohr G (2011b) Is there a buffering effect of flexibility for job attitudes and work-related strain under conditions of high job insecurity and regional unemployment rate? Econ Ind Democr 32:609–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto K, Thomson B, Rigotti T (2018) When dark leadership exacerbates the effects of restructuring. J Chang Manag 18:96–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer I, Dunford R, Akin G (2016) Managing organizational change. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietsch MC (2016) Bereit zur Veränderung? Über den Einfluss und die Wirkungsweise transformationaler Führung im Kontext organisationalen Wandels. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Philipps-Universität Marburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty AE, Griffin MA (2006) Perceptions of organizational change: a stress and coping perspective. J Appl Psychol 91:1154–1162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty AE, Restubog SL (2010) The impact of change process and context on change reactions and turnover during a merger. J Manage 36:1309–1338

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty AE, Restubog SL (2017) Why do employees’ perceptions of their organization’s change history matter? The role of change appraisals. Hum Resour Manage 56:533–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Räikkönen K, Matthews KA, Flory JD, Owens JF, Gump BB (1999) Effects of optimism, pessimism, and trait anxiety on ambulatory blood pressure and mood during everyday life. J Pers Soc Psychol 76:104–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richter P, Nebel C, Wolf S (2010) Ja, mach nur einen Plan! Gesundheitsinterventionen in turbulenten Zeiten. In: Rigotti T, Korek S, Otto K (Hrsg) Gesund mit und ohne Arbeit. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, S 73–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigotti T, Otto K, Köper B (2014) Herausforderung Restrukturierung – Bedeutung, Auswirkungen, Gestaltungsoptionen. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigotti T, Otto K, Mohr G (2008) Die Bedeutung von organisationaler Gerechtigkeit für das Beanspruchungserleben in Abhängigkeit von Kontextbedingungen: Ein Mehrebenenansatz. Wirtschaftspsychologie 10:24–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson SL, Rousseau DM (1994) Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. J Organiz Behav 15:245–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Roczniewska M, Higgins ET (2019) Messaging organizational change: How regulatory fit relates to openness to change through fairness perceptions. J Exp Soc Psychol 85:103882

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheel TE, Otto K, Vahle-Hinz T, Holstad T, Rigotti T (2019) A fair share of work: Is fairness of task distribution a mediator between transformational leadership and follower emotional exhaustion? Front Psychol 9:2427

    Google Scholar 

  • Self DR, Armenakis AA, Schraeder M (2007) Organizational change content, process, and context: A simultaneous analysis of employee reactions. J Chang Manag 7:211–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro DL, Fugate M (2012) Fostering anticipatory justice: A new option for enhancing the employee-organization relationship? In: Shore LM, Coyle-Shapiro JAM, Tetrick LE (Hrsg) The employee-organization relationship: applications for the 21st century. Routledge, New York, S 335–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol Methodol 13:290–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Sverke M, Hellgren J, Näswall K (2002) No security: a meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. J Occup Health Psychol 7:242–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner G, Otto K (2016) Superior-subordinate-communication during organizational change: under which conditions does a high-quality communication become important? Int J Hum Resour Manag 27:2183–2201

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai KL, Harrison W (2019) Organizational actions in gaining employee support for change: the roles of affective commitment to change, organizational justice, and organizational cynicism. J Organ Psychol 19:141–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Tvedt SD, Saksvic PØ, Nytr ØK (2009) Does change process healthiness reduce the negative effects of organizational change on the psychosocial work environment? Work Stress 2:80–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos K (2001) Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. J Pers Soc Psychol 80:931–941

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos K, Wilke HA, Lind EA (1998) When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. J Pers Soc Psychol 75:1449–1458

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Voet J (2014) The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure. Eur Manag J 32:373–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran C, Ones DS (2002) Examining the construct of organizational justice: a meta-analytic evaluation of relations with work attitudes and behaviors. J Bus Ethics 38:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao HH, Seibert SE, Taylor MS, Lee C, Lam W (2016) Not even the past: the joint influence of former leader and new leader during leader succession in the midst of organizational change. J Appl Psychol 101:1730–1738

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen Otto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Otto, K., Scheel, T. (2020). „Fair“ ändern? Veränderungsprozesse mittels Führung fair gestalten. In: Badura, B., Ducki, A., Schröder, H., Klose, J., Meyer, M. (eds) Fehlzeiten-Report 2020. Fehlzeiten-Report, vol 2020. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61524-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61524-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-61523-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-61524-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics