Zusammenfassung
Durch Hydrierung von CO2 lassen sich Kraftstoffe synthetisieren, die einen CO2-armen Betrieb von Verbrennungsmotoren ermöglichen. Voraussetzung dazu ist die CO2-arme Produktion von Wasserstoff. Referenzverfahren dafür ist die Dampfreformierung von Erdgas. Nachfolgend wird der Stand der Kenntnis zu verschiedenen infrage kommenden Verfahren und Verfahrensansätzen zur Herstellung von Wasserstoff aus fossilen Rohstoffen (Erdgas und Kohle), Biomasse, H2O und H2S beschrieben. Wichtige Parameter für eine Bewertung der Verfahren sind die Energieeffizienz, die CO2-Emission und die Integration in vorhandene Industrieparks. Primär zur Erzeugung von Synthesegas entwickelte Verfahren können zwar auch für eine Wasserstofferzeugung erweitert werden. Das ist aber für eine CO2-arme Kraftstoffsynthese kein Vorteil. Die Entwicklung der Methanpyrolyse als CO2-armes Produktionsverfahren für Wasserstoff erscheint besonders aussichtsreich, wenn die dabei entstehenden Koppelprodukte ohne CO2-Emission nutzbar sind. Die Wasserstofferzeugung durch elektrolytische Spaltung von H2O erfordert die Verwendung von CO2-freier elektrischer Energie. Die Spaltung von H2S in H2 und Schwefel ist wesentlich energieärmer als die Spaltung von Wasser aber bislang nur im Labor erfolgreich erprobt worden. Hier fehlt noch viel Entwicklungsarbeit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Mineralölwirtschaftsverband: Jahresbericht 2017. https://www.mwv.de/publikationen/jahresberichte/
Vogel A (2016) Energy challenges in the synthetic fuel industry. In: Perspectives of power to liquids and power to chemicals workshop, Freiburg, Germany, 16.–17. January 2016
de Klerk A (2008) Fischer-Tropsch Refining. PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria
de Klerk A (2008) Fischer – Tropsch refining: technology selection to match molecules. Green Chem 10(12):1249–1279
de Klerk A (2011) Catalysis in the refining of Fischer Tropsch Syncrude. Platinum Metals Rev 55(4):263–267
Goellner JE, Shah V, Turner MJ, Kuehn NJ, Littlefield J, Cooney G, Marriott J (2013) Analysis of natural gas-to-liquid transportation fuels via Fischer-Tropsch. DOE Contract Number DE-FE0004001, DOE/NETL-2013/1597
Heinitz-Adrian M, Brandl A, Hooper M, Zhao X, Tabak S (2007) An alternative route for coal to liquids: Methanol-To-Gasoline (MTG) technology. In: Gasification technology conference, San Francisco, USA, 14.–17. Oktober 2007
Hindman M (2010) Methanol to gasoline MTG technology. In: World CtL conference, Beijing, China, 13.–16. April 2010
Helton T, Hindman M (2014) Methanol to gasoline technology – an alternative for liquid fuel production. GtL technology forum 2014, Houston, USA, 30.–31. Juli 2014
Arnold U, Oestreich D, Pitter St, Sauer J (2014) Modified MtG processes for BtL and power to fuels. IEA Bioenergy. In: Task 33 workshop liquid biofuels, Karlsruhe, Germany, 3.–4. November 2014
Schmidt St, Kuschel M, Seifert P, Meyer B (2015) Synthetic gasoline production in combination with carbon dioxide utilization. In: 7th Intern. Freiberg, Inner Mongolia conference, Huhhot, China, 7.–11. Juni 2015
Hrsg (2017) ProcessNet-Arbeitsausschuss „Alternative flüssige und gasförmige Kraft- und Brennstoffe“ Fortschrittliche alternative flüssige Brenn- und Kraftstoffe: Für Klimaschutz im globalen Rohstoffwandel. http://www.dechema.de/studien.html
Zakkour P, Cook G (2010) CCS roadmap for industry: high purity CO2 sources. Carbon counts co final draft report, September 2010. https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/publications/ccs-roadmap-industry-high-purity-co2-sources-sectoral-assessment-%E2%80%93-final-draft-report
IEAGHG (2017) Reference data and supporting literature reviews for SMR based hydrogen production with CCS. 2017-TR3, March 2017. http://www.ieaghg.org/ccs-resources/bio-ccs-web-tool/49-publications/technical-reports/778-2017-tr3-reference-data-supporting-literature-reviews-for-smr-based-hydrogen-production-with-ccs
Baufume S, Gruger F, Grube T, Krieg D, Linssen J, Weber M, Hake J-F, Stolten D (2013) GIS-based scenario calculations for a nationwide German hydrogen pipeline infrastructure. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:3813–3829
Rostrup-Nielsen JR, Rostrup-Nielsen T (2002) Large scale hydrogen production. Topsoe technologies CATTECH 6(4):150–159 http://www.topsoe.com/sites/default/files/topsoe_large_scale_hydrogen_produc.pdf
Aasberg-Petersen K, Dybkjaer I, Ovesen CV, Schjödt NC, Sehested J, Thomsen S (2011) Natural gas to synthesis gas – catalysts and catalytic processes. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 3:423–459
Aasberg-Petersen K, Nielsen CS, Dybkjaer I, Perregaard J (2009) Large scale methanol production from natural gas. Haldor-Topsoe Firmendruckschrift
Collodi G, Azzarro G, Ferrari N, Santos S (2017) Techno-economic evaluation of deploying CCS in SMR based Merchant H2 production with NG as feedstock and fuel. Energy Procedia 114:2690–2712
IEAGHG (2017) Techno-economic evaluation of SMR based standalone (Merchant) plant with CCS, 2017/02, February 2017. http://ieaghg.org/component/content/article/49-publications/technical-reports/784-2017-02-smr-based-h2-plant-with-ccs
Alarcon F (2012) Prenflo gasification technology experiences from puertollano plant. Short course gasification processes, Institut für Energieverfahrenstechnik und Chemieingenieurwesen, TU BA Freiberg, Germany, 17.–18. September 2012
Casero P, Garcia-Pena F, Coca P (2013) Elcogas: precombustion capture pilot. Real experience of commercial technology. Energy Procedia 37:6374–6382
Casero P (2012) Elcogas 14 MWth pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture pilot: technical and economical achievements. In: 5th Intern. Freiberg conf. on IGCC XtL technologies, Leipzig, Germany, 21.–24. Mai 2012
Coca-Llano P (2011) Puertollano IGCC: pilot plant for CO2 capture and H2 production. In: 2nd intern. Conference on energy process engineering, Frankfurt, Germany, 20.–22. Juni 2011
Garcia-Pena F (2014) H2 production from coal and biomass co-gasification Elcogas experience on the field. In: European Hydrogen Energy Conf. (EHEC), Sevilla, Spain, 12.–14. März 2014
Harp G, Tran K-C, Sigurbjörnsson O, Bergins C, Buddenberg T (2016) Carbon recycling for converting coke oven gas to methanol for the reduction of carbon dioxide at steel mill. Scanmet V, Lulea, Sweden, 12.–15. Juni 2016
Harp G, Bergins C, Buddenberg T (2017) Combined PtL and use of by-product H2 in an integrated steel mill – industrial symbiosis between chemical and steel industry. In: 3rd ESTAD, Vienna, Austria, 26.–29 Juni 2017
Diemer P, Killich H-J, Knop K, Lüngen H-B, Reinke M, Schmöle P (2004) Potentials for utilisation of coke oven gas in integrated iron and steel works. Stahl u Eisen 124(7):21–30
Harp G, Tran K-C, Sigurbjörnsson O, Bergins C, Buddenberg T, Drach I (2015) Application of power to methanol technology to integrated steelworks for profitability, conversion efficiency, and CO2 reduction. In: 2nd ESTAD, Düsseldorf, Germany, 15.–19. Juni 2015
Yang Z, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhang Y, Lu X, Ding W (2010) Steam reforming of coke oven gas for hydrogen production over a NiO/MgO solid solution catalyst. Energy Fuels 24(2):785–788
Kreysa G (2008) Methan – Chance für eine klimaverträgliche Energieversorgung. Chem Ing Techn 80(7):901–908
Abanades A, Ruiz E, Ferruelo EM, Hernandez F, Canaillas A, Martinez-Val JM, Rubio JA, Lopez C, Gavela R, Barrera G, Rubbia C, Salmieri D, Rodilla E, Gutierrez D (2011) Experimental analysis of direct thermal methane cracking. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36(20):12877–12886
Muradov N (2001) Hydrogen via methane decomposition: an application for decarbonization of fossil fuels. Int J Hydrogen Energy 26(11):1165–1175
Muradov N (2017) Low to near-zero CO2 production of hydrogen from fossil fuels: status and perspectives. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(20):14058–14088
Keipi T (2017) Technology development and techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production by thermal decomposition of methane. Dr. Degree Thesis, Tampere University of Technology
Bode A, Anderlohr Ch, Bernnat J, Flick F, Glenk F, Klingler D, Kolios G, Scheiff F, Wechsung A, Hensmann M, Möhring St, Stubbe G, Lizandara C, Lange de Oliveira A, Schunk StA, Göke V, Hunfeld J, Mihailowitsch D, Pleintinger St, Posselt H, Weikl MC, Zander H-J, Antweiler N, Büker K, Eckbauer M, Krüger M, Marek P, Rosermund K, Janhsen U, Mittelstädt H, Möllers Ch, Agar DW, Munera-Parra A (2018) Feste und fluide Produkte aus Gas – FfPaG Schlussbericht BMBF FKZ 033RC1301 A-G, März 2018
Stalhead J (1952) Die Herstellung von Eisenschwamm nach dem Wiherg-Söderfors-Verfahren. Stahl u Eisen 72:459–466
Stubbe G, Harp G, Marx K, Ebner M, Mirabile D, Pistelli MI (2013) Upgrading and Utilisation of Residual Iron Oxide Materials for hot metal production (URIOM) Final report EUR 25081. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/056728f2-0a2c-428e-b9a9-381dffe1a7d5/language-en/format-PDF/source-69944060
Geißler T, Abanades A, Heinzel A, Mehravan K, Müller G, Rathnam RK, Rubbia C, Salmieri D, Stoppel L, Stückrad S, Weisenburger A, Wenninger H, Wetzel Th (2016) Hydrogen production via methane pyrolysis in a liquid metal bubble column reactor with a packed bed. Chem Eng J 299:192–200
Plevan M (2017) Entwicklung eines Verfahrens zur thermischen Zerlegung von Methan zu Wasserstoff und Kohlenstoff unter Nutzung flüssiger Metalle als Wärmeübertragungsmedium. Dr.-Ing Dissertation, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie KIT
Upham DCh, Agarwal V, Khechfe A, Snodgrass ZR, Gordon MJ, Metiu H, McFarland E (2017) Catalytic molten metals for the direct conversion of methane to hydrogen and separable carbon. Science 358:917–921
Parkinson B, Tabatabaei M, Upham DCh, Ballinger B, Greig Ch, Smart S, McFarland E (2018) Hydrogen production using methane: techno-economics of decarbonizing fuels and chemicals. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43(5):2540–2555
Chernichowski A (1994) Gliding arc. Applications to engineering and environment control. Pure Appl Chem 66(6):1301–1310
Chernichowski A, Chernichowski M, Chernichowski P, Wesolowska K (2006) Hydrogen or syngas generation using plasma technology. Topsoe Catalysis Forum 2006 (https://www.topsoe.com/sites/default/files/czernichowski.pdf)
Paulmier T, Fulcheri L (2005) Use of non-thermal plasma for hydrocarbon reforming. Chem Eng J 106(1):59–71
Petitpas G, Gonzalez-Aguilar J, Darmon A, Metkemeijer R, Fulcheri F (2007) Non-equilibrium plasma assisted hydrogen production: state-of-the-art. In: Proc. 28th ICPIG internatinal conference on phenomena in ionised gases, Prague, Czech Republic, S 1177–1179, 15.–20. Juli 2007
Sennewald K, Schallus E, Pohl F (1963) Erzeugung von Acetylen durch thermische Spaltung von Kohlenwasserstoffen mittels hocherhitzten Wasserstoffes (WLP-Verfahren der Knapsack Griesheim AG). Chem Ing Techn 35(1):1–7
Baumann P (1948) Erzeugung von Acetylen nach dem Lichtbogen-Verfahren. Angew Chem Ausgabe B 20(10):257–259
Gladisch H (1969) Acetylen-Herstellung im elektrischen Lichtbogen. Chem Ing Techn 41(4):204–208
Brachold H, Peuckert C, Regner H (1993) Lichtbogen-Plasma-Reaktor für die Herstellung von Acetylen aus Kohle. Chem Ing Techn 65(3):293–297
Gaudernack B, Lynum St (1998) Hydrogen from natural gas without release of CO2 to the atmosphere. Int J Hydrogen Energy 23(12):1087–1093
Lynum St (1996) The Kvaerner CB&H Process. In: Carbon black world 1996, Nice, France, 4.–6. März 1996
Lynum St (1994) CO2-free hydrogen from hydrocarbons. The Kvaerner CB6H Process. In: Proc. 5th Annual US hydrogen meeting, Washington DC, USA, 23.–25. März 1994, S 6–47, 56
Harp G (2018) Methanol as key for industrial symbiosis between chemistry and steel. In: 6th conference on CO2 as feedstock for fuels, Chemistry and polymers, Köln, Germany, 15.–16. März 2018
Ahmad M, Subawi H (2013) New van Krevelen diagram and its correlation with the heating value of biomass. RJAEM 2(10):295–301
Dahmen N, Henrich E, Dinjus E, Weinrich F (2012) The bioliq® bioslurry gasification process for the production of biosynfuels, organic chemicals, and energy. Energy Sustain Soc 2:3–47
Müller-Langer F, Kaltschmitt M (2007) Wasserstofferzeugung aus Biomasse in der Gesamtschau Bio-chemische und thermo-chemische Verfahren im Vergleich. Gülzower Fachgespräche, Bd 25: „Wasserstoff aus Biomasse“, S 194–216
Hosseini SE, Wahid MA, Jamil MM, Azli AAM, Misbah MF (2015) A review on biomass-based hydrogen production for renewable energy supply. Int J Energ Res 39(12):1597–1615
Berglin N, Lindblom M, Ekbom T (2003) Preliminary economics of black liquor gasification with motor fuels production. Colloquium on black liquor combustion and gasification, University of Utah, Park City, USA, 13.–16. Mai 2003
Ekbom T, Lindblom M, Berglin N, Ahlvik P (2003) Technical and commercial feasibility study of black liquor gasification with methanol/DME production as motor fuels for automotive uses – BLGMF. Final Report Altener II EU-Project Contract Nr 4.1030/Z/01-087/2001, Dezember 2003. citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.468.6163&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Landälf I, Lindblom M D3.1.1 Report with evaluation of the Skoghall plant performance. RE-NEW Renewable fuels for advanced powertrains (2005) RENEW Renewable fuels for advanced powertrains FP6 project SES6-CT-2003-502705. http://www.renew-fuel.com/fs_documents.php
Landälf I, Gebart R, Marke B, Granberg F, Furusjö E, Löwnertz P, Öhrmann OGW, Lauge Sörensen E, Salomonsson P (2014) Two years experience of the BioDME project – a complete wood to wheel concept. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 33(3):744–750
Furusjö E, Kirtania K, Jafri Y, Bach-Oller A, Umeki K, Andersson J, Lundgren J, Wetter-lund E, Landälf I, Gebart R (2015 ) Co-gasification of pyrolysis oil and black liquor – a new track for pro-duction of chemicals and transportation fuels from biomass tcbiomass2015. In: Intern. Conf. on ther-mochemical conversion science, Westin Chicago River North, 2.–5. November 2015. http://www.gastechnology.org/tcbiomass/Pages/2015-tcbiomass-presentations.aspx
Carlsson P, Gebart R, Grönberg C, Marklund M, Risberg M, Wiinikka H, Öhrman O (2009) Spatially resolved measurements of gas composition in a pressurised black liquor gasifier. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 28(3):316–323
Risberg M (2011) Black liquor gasification – burner characteristics and syngas cooling. Lic Thesis March 2011, Lulea Technical University
Jafri Y, Furusjö E, Kirtania K, Gebart R (2016) Performance of a pilot scale entrained-flow black liquor gasifier. Energy Fuels 30(3):3175–3185
Dahmen N, Dinjus E, Henrich E (2007) Das Karlsruher Verfahren bioliq® Synthesekraftstoffe aus Biomasse. In: Bührke Th, Wengenmayr R (Hrsg) Erneuerbare Energie: Alternative Energiekonzepte für die Zukunft, 1. Aufl. Wiley VCH, Weinheim, S 61–65
Dahmen N (2008) Die Schnellpyrolyse im Rahmen des bioliq®-Verfahrens am Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe. In: Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (Hrsg) Gülzower Fachgespräche Bd 28 Biocrudeoil, S 98–114
Dahmen N, Henrich E, Dinjus E, Weirich F (2012) The bioliq® bioslurry gasification process for the production of biosynfuels, organic chemicals, and energy. Energy Sustain Soc 2:3–47
Tomasi Morgano M, Leibold H, Richter F (2015) Upgrading of low-grade biogenic feedstock by innovative screw pyrolysis. Biorefineries, Concepcion, Chile, 23.–25. November 2015. https://www.biorrefinerias.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/MTomasi-Biorefineries_2015_ForWebsite_03122015.pdf
Tomasi Morgano M, Leibold H, Richter F, Stapf D, Seifert H (2018) Screw pyrolysis technology for sewage sludge treatment. Waste Manag 73:487–495
Eberhard M, Santo U, Böning D, Schmid H, Michelfelder B, Zimmerlin B, Günther A, Weigand P, Müller-Hagedorn M, Stapf D, Kolb Th (2018) Der bioliq-Flugstromvergaser – ein Baustein der Energiewende. Chem Ing Techn 90(1–2):85–98
Henrich E, Dahmen N, Niebel A Study on energy carrier use on entrained flow gasification. Report Deliverable 5.8 BioBoost EU Project. http://www.bioboost.eu/results/applications.php
Rammler R (1966) Betriebserfahrungen mit dem LR-Verfahren zur Entgasung feinkörniger Brennstoffe. Erdoel Kohle 19(2):117–126
Schmalfeld P (1975) The use of the Lurgi-Rurgas Process for the Distillation of Oil Shale. Colo sch Mines qtly 70(3):129–145
Vogel F (2016) Kap. 15. Hydrothermale Verfahren. In: Kaltschmitt M, Hartmann H, Hofbauer H (Hrsg) Energie aus Biomasse: Grundlagen Techniken und Verfahren. Springer, Berlin
Potic B (2016) Gasification of biomass in supercritical water. Dr. Dissertation 2006. Universität Twente, Niederlande
Van Bennekom JG (2013) Glycerol reforming and methanol synthesis for the production of renewable methanol. Dr. Dissertation 2013. Universität Groningen, Niederlande
Boukis N, Dinjus E (2007) Bau einer Anlage zur Biomassevergasung unter hydrothermalen Bedingungen. Schlussbericht BMBF Förderkennzeichen 0330267. https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/TIBKAT%3A559688539/
Boukis N, Kruse A, Galla U, Diem V, Dinjus E (2003) Biomassevergasung in überkritischem Wasser. NACHRICHTEN – FZKA 35(3):99–104
Boukis N, Korving L, Hauer E, Herbig S, Sauer J (2015) Gasification of sewage sludge in supercritical water, experimental results from the gasification of dutch sewage sludge. In: Proc. 23rd European biomass conference, Vienna, Austria, 1.–4. Juni 2015, S 83–87
Boukis N, Herbig S, Hauer E, Sauer J (2016) Catalytic gasification of digestate sludge in supercritical water, experimental results on the pilot scale. In: Proc. 24th European biomass conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 6.–9. Juni 2016, S 1062–1066
Smolinka T (2015) Wasserstofferzeugung durch PEM Elektrolyse – Grundlagen und Entwicklungstrends einer Schlüsseltechnologie für die Energiewende. In: Vortrag Anorganisch-Chemisches Seminar. Universität Freiburg, 22. Juli 2015
Firmendruckschrift Hydrogenics HyLYZER 600. http://www.hydrogenics.com/technology-resources/media-downloads/
Jensen SH, Graves C, Chen M, Hansen JB, Sun X (2016) Characterization of a Planar Solid Oxide Cell Stack Operated at Elevated Pressure. J Electrochem Soc 163(14):F1596–F1604
http://www.sunfire.de/de/produkte-und-technologie/sunfire-hylink
Zaman J, Chakma A (1995) Production of hydrogen and sulfur from hydrogen sulfide. Fuel Process Technol 41:159–198
T-Raissi A (2001) Technoeconomic analysis of area II hydrogen production – part 1. In: Proc. 2001 DOE hydrogen program review NREL/CP-570-30535
Li Y, Yu X, Guo Q, Dai Z, Yu G, Wang F (2017) Kinetic study of decomposition of H2S and CH4 for H2 production using detailed mechanism. Energy Procedia 142:1065–1070
Reverberi AP, Klemes JJ, Varbanov PV, Fabiano B (2016) A review on hydrogen production from hydrogen sulphide by chemical and photochemical methods. J Clean Prod 139:72–80
Ozaki J, Yoshimoto Y, Oya A, Takarada T, Kuzunetsov VV, Ismagilov ZR (2001) H2S decomposition activity of TS carbon derived from furan resin. Carbon 39:1605–1616
Startsev AN (2017) Hydrogen sulfide as a source of hydrogen production. Russ Chem Bull Int Edition 66(8):1378–1397
Startsev AN, Kruglykova OV, Chesalov YA, Paukshtis EA, Avdeev VI, Ruzankin SP, Zhdanov AA, Molina IY, Plyasova LM (2016) Low-temperature catalytic decomposition of hydrogen sulfide on metal catalysts under layer of solvent. J Sulfur Chem 37(2):229–240
Startsev AN (2016) Low temperature catalytic decomposition of hydrogen sulfide into hydrogen and diatomic gaseous sulfur. Kinetics and Catalysis. Kinet Catal 57(4):511–522
Startsev AN, Bulgakov NN, Ruzankin SP, Kruglykova OV, Paukshtis EA (2015) The reaction thermodynamics of hydrogen sulfide decomposition into hydrogen and diatomic sulfur. J Sulfur Chem 36(3):234–239
Startsev AN, Kruglykova OV, Chesalov YA, Ruzankin SP, Kravtsov EA, Larina TV, Paukshtis EA (2013) Low temperature catalytic decomposition of hydrogen sulfide into hydrogen and diatomic gaseous sulfur. Top Catal 56(11):969–980
Anani AA, Mao Z, White RE, Srinivasan S, Appleby AJ (1990) Electrochemical Production of hydrogen and sulfuer by low-temperature decomposition of hydrogen sulfide in an aqueous alkaline solution. J Electrochem Soc 137(9):2703–2709
Mao Z, Anani A, White RE, Srinivasan S, Appleby AJ (1991) A modified electrochemical process for the decomposition of hydrogen sulfide in aqueous alkaline solution. J Electrochem Soc 138(5):1299–1303
Selvaraj, H.; Chandrasekaran, K.; Gopalkrishnan, R.: Recovery of solid sulfur from hydrogen sulfide gas by an electrochemical membrane cell. RSC Advances 6 (2016) S. 3735/41
Gray D, White Ch, Salerno S, Plunkett J, Tomlinson G (2010) Production of high purity hydro-gen from domestic coal: assessing the techno-economic impact of emerging technologies. DOE/NETL-2010/1432, 30. August 2010
Burmistrz P, Chmielniak T, Czepirski L, Gazda-Grzywacz M (2016) Carbon footprint of the hydrogen production process utilizing subbituminous coal and lignite gasification. J Clean Prod 139:858–865
Machhammer O, Bode A, Hormuth W (2015) Ökonomisch/ökologische Betrachtung der Herstellung von Wasserstoff in Großanlagen. Chem Ing Techn 87(4):409–418
Postels S, Abanades A, van der Assen N, Kumar Rathnam R, Stückrad S, Bardow A (2016) Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production by thermal cracking of methane, based on liquid metal technology. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:23204–23212
Icha P, Kuhs G Entwicklung der spezifischen Kohlendioxid-Emissionen des deutschen Strommix in den Jahren 1990–2016. Hrsg. Umweltbundesamt Climate Change 15/2017. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/1410/publikationen/2017-05-22_climate-change_15-2017_strommix.pdf
Hamaguchi M, Cardoso M, Vakkilainen E (2012) Alternative technologies for biofuels production in kraft pulp mills – potential and prospects. Energies 5(7):2288–2309
Weltgrösste Wasserstoff-Elektrolyse entsteht in der Rheinland Raffinerie. Pressemitteilung der Shell Deutschland GmbH. https://www.shell.de/medien/shell-presseinformationen/2018/weltweit-groe%C3%9Fte-wasserstoff-elektrolyse-anlage-rheinland.html. Zugegriffen: 18. Jan. 2018
http://www.investoren.chempark.de/einblick/stoffverbund/dormagen.html#head
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harp, G. (2019). Technologien zur Produktion von Wasserstoff für die Herstellung synthetischer Kraftstoffe. In: Maus, W. (eds) Zukünftige Kraftstoffe. ATZ/MTZ-Fachbuch. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58006-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58006-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58005-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58006-6
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)