Skip to main content

A Comparison of NACA 0012 and NACA 0021 Self-noise at Low Reynolds Number

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fluid-Structure-Sound Interactions and Control

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

The self-noise of NACA 0012 and NACA 0021 airfoils are recorded at a Reynolds numbers of 96,000 in an anechoic wind tunnel at an angle-of-attack range of \(-5^\circ \)\(40^\circ \). Results suggest that the low angle-of-attack tonal noise of the airfoils behaves differently, with the NACA 0021 producing tones at much higher angles-of-attack but not near \(0^\circ \). Noise generated at the onset of stall is subtlely different, with signature of the NACA 0012 forming over a larger angular range compared to the NACA 0021 where the stall signature forms suddenly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcondoulis E, Doolan C, Zander A (2009) Airfoil noise measurements at various angles of attack and low Reynolds number. In: Proceedings on Acoustics 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks T, Pope D, Marcolini M (1989) Airfoil self-noise and prediction. NASA Reference Publication, Technical report 1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Colonius T, Williams D (2011) Control of vortex shedding on two- and three-dimensional aerofoils. Phil Trans R Soc A 369(1940):1525–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fage A, Johansen F (1927) On the flow of air behind an inclined flat plate of infinite span. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 116:170–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen K, Kelso R, Doolan C (2010) Reduction of flow induced tonal noise through leading edge tubercle modifications. AIAA Paper 2010:3700

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchman F, Gunther C, Gundlach J (1998) Semi-span testing at low reynolds number. AIAA Paper 608

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine A (1997) Generation of discrete frequency tones by the flow around an aerofoil. PhD thesis, School of Mathematics, University of Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau S, Roger M, Christophe J (2009) Flow features and self-noise of airfoils near stall or in stall. In: 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez I, Lehmkuhl O, Borrell R, Oliva A (2013) Direct numerical simulation of a naca0012 in full stall. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 43:194–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Laratro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Laratro, A., Arjomandi, M., Cazzolato, B., Kelso, R. (2016). A Comparison of NACA 0012 and NACA 0021 Self-noise at Low Reynolds Number. In: Zhou, Y., Lucey, A., Liu, Y., Huang, L. (eds) Fluid-Structure-Sound Interactions and Control. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48868-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48868-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48866-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48868-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics