Abstract
The present paper refines Herzberg and Eckert’s model- theoretic approach to aggregation. The proposed refinement is aimed at naturally accounting for vote abstention, and is technically based on a more general notion of ultraproduct than the one standardly occurring in model theory textbooks. Unlike the standard ultraproduct construction, which yields the empty model as soon as any one single coordinate features the empty model, this generalized ultraproduct construction faithfully reflects the indication of ‘large sets’. Thus, our proposed refinement naturally accounts for those situations in which e.g. a voting round is non-null if and only if a ‘large set’ of voters actually participate in the vote. In the present setting, Arrow’s impossibility theorem also covers ‘elections with only two candidates’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow, K.: Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Cowles Foundation Monograph, vol. 12. John Wiley & Sons (1963)
Bedrosian, G., Palmigiano, A., Zhao, Z.: Generalized ultraproduct and Kirman-Sondermann correspondence for vote abstention, working paper (2015), http://www.appliedlogictudelft.nl/publications/
Bell, J.L., Slomson, A.B.: Models and ultraproducts: an introduction, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1974)
Esteban, M., Palmigiano, A., Zhao, Z.: An Abstract Algebraic Logic view on Judgment Aggregation. In: Proceedings of Logic, Rationality and Interaction, 5th International Workshop, LORI 2015 (2015)
Fey, M.: Mays theorem with an infinite population. Social Choice and Welfare 23(2), 275–293 (2004)
Fishburn, P.: Arrow’s impossibility theorem: concise proof and infinite voters. Journal of Economic Theory 2, 103–106 (1970)
Herzberg, F.: Universal algebra for general aggregation theory: many-valued propositional-attitude aggregators as MV-homomorphisms. Journal of Logic and Computation (2013)
Herzberg, F., Eckert, D.: The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates. Journal of Mathematical Social Science 64, 41–47 (2012)
Eckert, D., Herzberg, F.: The problem of judgment aggregation in the framework of Boolean-valued models. In: Bulling, N., van der Torre, L., Villata, S., Jamroga, W., Vasconcelos, W. (eds.) CLIMA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8624, pp. 138–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Keiding, H.: The categorical approach to social choice theory. Journal of Mathematical Social Sciences 1, 177–191 (1981)
Kirman, A., Sondermann, D.: Arrow’s theorem, many agents, and invisible dictators. Journal of Economic Theory 5(2), 267–277 (1972)
Lauwers, L., Van Liedekerke, L.: Ultraproducts and aggregation. Journal of Mathematical Economics 24(3), 217–237 (1995)
Makkai, M., Ultraproducts and categorical logic. Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1130, pp. 222–309. Springer (1985)
Pivato, M.: Variable-population voting rules. Journal of Mathematical Economics 49(3), 210–221 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bedrosian, G., Palmigiano, A., Zhao, Z. (2015). Generalized Ultraproduct and Kirman-Sondermann Correspondence for Vote Abstention. In: van der Hoek, W., Holliday, W., Wang, Wf. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9394. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48560-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48561-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)