Skip to main content

Generalized Ultraproduct and Kirman-Sondermann Correspondence for Vote Abstention

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9394))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The present paper refines Herzberg and Eckert’s model- theoretic approach to aggregation. The proposed refinement is aimed at naturally accounting for vote abstention, and is technically based on a more general notion of ultraproduct than the one standardly occurring in model theory textbooks. Unlike the standard ultraproduct construction, which yields the empty model as soon as any one single coordinate features the empty model, this generalized ultraproduct construction faithfully reflects the indication of ‘large sets’. Thus, our proposed refinement naturally accounts for those situations in which e.g. a voting round is non-null if and only if a ‘large set’ of voters actually participate in the vote. In the present setting, Arrow’s impossibility theorem also covers ‘elections with only two candidates’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.: Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Cowles Foundation Monograph, vol. 12. John Wiley & Sons (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bedrosian, G., Palmigiano, A., Zhao, Z.: Generalized ultraproduct and Kirman-Sondermann correspondence for vote abstention, working paper (2015), http://www.appliedlogictudelft.nl/publications/

  3. Bell, J.L., Slomson, A.B.: Models and ultraproducts: an introduction, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Esteban, M., Palmigiano, A., Zhao, Z.: An Abstract Algebraic Logic view on Judgment Aggregation. In: Proceedings of Logic, Rationality and Interaction, 5th International Workshop, LORI 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fey, M.: Mays theorem with an infinite population. Social Choice and Welfare 23(2), 275–293 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fishburn, P.: Arrow’s impossibility theorem: concise proof and infinite voters. Journal of Economic Theory 2, 103–106 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Herzberg, F.: Universal algebra for general aggregation theory: many-valued propositional-attitude aggregators as MV-homomorphisms. Journal of Logic and Computation (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herzberg, F., Eckert, D.: The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates. Journal of Mathematical Social Science 64, 41–47 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Eckert, D., Herzberg, F.: The problem of judgment aggregation in the framework of Boolean-valued models. In: Bulling, N., van der Torre, L., Villata, S., Jamroga, W., Vasconcelos, W. (eds.) CLIMA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8624, pp. 138–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keiding, H.: The categorical approach to social choice theory. Journal of Mathematical Social Sciences 1, 177–191 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirman, A., Sondermann, D.: Arrow’s theorem, many agents, and invisible dictators. Journal of Economic Theory 5(2), 267–277 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lauwers, L., Van Liedekerke, L.: Ultraproducts and aggregation. Journal of Mathematical Economics 24(3), 217–237 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Makkai, M., Ultraproducts and categorical logic. Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1130, pp. 222–309. Springer (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pivato, M.: Variable-population voting rules. Journal of Mathematical Economics 49(3), 210–221 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geghard Bedrosian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bedrosian, G., Palmigiano, A., Zhao, Z. (2015). Generalized Ultraproduct and Kirman-Sondermann Correspondence for Vote Abstention. In: van der Hoek, W., Holliday, W., Wang, Wf. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9394. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48560-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48561-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics