Skip to main content

An Overview of Attributes Characterization for Interoperability Assessment from the Public Administration Perspective

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2014 Workshops (OTM 2014)

Abstract

The government interoperability frameworks (GIFs) are mainly centered on technical perspective neglecting important actual issues in Public Administration (PA) as the performance of their services and process as well its strategic, legal and politic positioning. This wide spectrum of organizational knowledge demands specific interoperability assessment (IA) methods based on a preliminary step of identifying and organizing adequate attributes that allow a wider view on the PA domain regarding interoperability requirements. This paper proposes a knowledge discovering and extraction method from PA and IA literature, presenting a rationality through a conceptual model in order to identify and organize attributes that will be used as input for an IA model. A preliminary set of attributes is presented, as well as a future approach of how to deal with these attributes using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) in order to evaluate them with experts through a specific structure suited to the IA process itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. IEEE Standard computer dictionary. A Compilation of IEEE Standard computer glossaries, IEEE Std 610, p. 114 (1991), doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.1991.106963

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carney, D., Fisher, D., Place, P.: Topics in Interoperability: System-of-Systems Evolution. Technical Note, CMU/SEI-2005-TN-002. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2005), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/05tn002.pdf

  3. Pardo, T.A., Burke, G.B.: Improving Government Interoperability: A Capability Assessment Framework for Government Managers. Technical report. Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, NY, USA (2008), http://goo.gl/20z27B (retrieved)

  4. Yahia, E., Aubry, A., Panetto, H.: Formal measures for semantic interoperability assessment in cooperative enterprise information systems. Computers in Industry 63(5), 443–457 (2012), doi:10.1016/j.compind.2012.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Camargo, A.R.: Cidade e informática, contatos e interações: explorando manifestações de urbanização virtual, Pesquisa CNPq Proc 301383 /2005-7. Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, USP, São Carlos, SP (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Novakouski, M., Lewis, G.: Interoperability in the e-Government Context. Technical Note, CMU/SEI-2011-TN-014, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2012), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/11tn014.pdf (retrieved)

  7. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). e-Government Interoperability: Overview (2007), http://goo.gl/bfK0ix

  8. Cestari, J.M.A.P., Loures, E.R., Santos, E.A.P., Lezoche, M.: A Research Strategy for Public Administration Interoperability Assessment. In: Industrial & Systems Engineering Research Conference (ISERC), Montreal, Canada (2014), http://goo.gl/z26gDG

  9. Ray, D., Gulla, U., Dash, S.S., Gupta, M.P.: A critical survey of selected government interoperability frameworks. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 5(2), 114–142 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Solli-Sather, H.: A framework for analyzing interoperability in electronic government. International Journal of Electronic Finance 5(1), 32–48 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gottschalk, P.: Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Government Information Quarterly 26(1), 75–81 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zutshi, A., Grilo, A., Jardim-Goncalves, R.: The business interoperability quotient measurement model. Computers in Industry 63(5), 389–404 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Integration Definition for Function Modeling, IDEF0 (1993), http://www.idef.com/pdf/idef0.pdf

  14. Saaty, R.W.: The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling 9(3–5), 161–176 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5(1), 14–37 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Swan, J., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., Hislop, D.: Knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking. Journal of Knowledge Management 3(4), 262–275 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Von Krogh, G.: Care in knowledge Creation. California Management Review 40(3), 133–153 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Keeling, J.: Development of Systematic Knowledge Management for Public Health: A Public Health Law Ontology. PhD Thesis, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vocabulary Dictionary, http://www.vocabulary.com/

  20. Cambridge Dictionaries Online, http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us

  21. Oxford Dictionaries, http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us

  22. Object Management Group, http://www.uml.org/

  23. Deschamps, F.: Proposal for the systematization of enterprise engineering contributions: guidelines for enterprise engineering initiatives. PhD Thesis, PUCPR, Curitiba (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. MaxQDA, http://www.maxqda.com/

  25. Pierce, J.R.: An introduction to information theory: symbols, signals & noise by John Robinson Pierce, p. 336. Dover Publications, Subsequent (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stanford POS Tagger software, http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tagger.shtml

  27. Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C., Singer, Y.: Feature-Rich Part-of-Speech Tagging with a Cyclic Dependency Network. In: Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, pp. 252–259 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lezoche, M., Panetto, H., Aubry, A.: Conceptualisation approach for cooperative information systems interoperability. In: ICEIS 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S.: Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of operational research 169(1), 1–29 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Liao, Y., Loures, E.R., Panetto, H., Canciglieri, O.: A Novel Approach for Ontological Representation of Analytic Hierarchy Process. Adv. Materials Research, Online (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Guédria, W., Naudet, Y., Chen, D.: A maturity model assessing interoperability potential. In: Halpin, T., Nurcan, S., Krogstie, J., Soffer, P., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Bider, I. (eds.) BPMDS 2011 and EMMSAD 2011. LNBIP, vol. 81, pp. 276–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cestari, J.M.A.P., Loures, E.d.F.R., Santos, E.A.P., Liao, Y., Panetto, H., Lezoche, M. (2014). An Overview of Attributes Characterization for Interoperability Assessment from the Public Administration Perspective. In: Meersman, R., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2014 Workshops. OTM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8842. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45550-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45550-0_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45549-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45550-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics