Abstract
This paper investigates the problem of Byzantine Agreement in a synchronous system where malicious agents can move from process to process, corrupting their host. Earlier works on the problem are based on biased models which, as we argue in the paper, give an unfair advantage either to the correct processes or to the adversary controlling the malicious agents. Indeed, the earlier studies of the problem assume that, after a malicious agent has left a process, that process, said to be cured, is able to instantly and accurately detect the fact that it was corrupted in earlier rounds, and thus can take local actions to recover a valid state (Garay’s model). We found no justification for that assumption which clearly favors correct processes. Under that model, an algorithm is known for n > 4t, where n is the number of processes and t the maximum number of malicious agents. The tightness of the bound is unknown. In contrast, more recent work on the problem remove the assumption on detection and assume instead that a malicious agent may have left corrupted messages in the send queue of a cured process. As a result, the adversary controlling the malicious agents can corrupt the messages sent by cured processes, as well as those sent by the newly corrupted ones, thus doubling the number of effective faults. Under that model, which favors the malicious agents, the problem can be solved if and only if n > 6t. In this paper, we refine the latter model to avoid the above biases. While a cured process may send messages (based on a state corrupted by the malicious agent), it will behave correctly in the way it sends those messages: i.e., send messages according to the algorithm. Surprisingly, in this model we could derive a new non-trivial tight bound for Byzantine Agreement. We prove that at least 5t + 1 processors are needed in order to tolerate t mobile Byzantine agents and provide a time optimal algorithm that matches this lower bound, altogether with a formal specification of the problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Banu, N., Souissi, S., Izumi, T., Wada, K.: An improved byzantine agreement algorithm for synchronous systems with mobile faults. International Journal of Computer Applications 43(22), 1–7 (2012)
Bonnet, F., Défago, X., Nguyen, T.D., Potop-Butucaru, M.: Tight bound on mobile byzantine agreement. Research Report IS-RR-2014-004, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST) (May 2014)
Bracha, G.: An o(log n) expected rounds randomized byzantine generals protocol. Journal of the ACM 34(4), 910–920 (1987)
Buhrman, H., Garay, J.A., Hoepman, J.H.: Optimal resiliency against mobile faults. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing (FTCS 1995), pp. 83–88 (1995)
Correia, M., Veronese, G.S., Lung, L.C.: Asynchronous byzantine consensus with 2f + 1 processes. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2010, pp. 475–480 (2010)
Daliot, A., Dolev, D.: Self-stabilizing Byzantine agreement. In: Proc. 25th ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2006), pp. 143–152 (2006)
Dolev, D.: The byzantine generals strike again. Journal of Algorithms 3(1), 14–30 (1982)
Dolev, D., Fischer, M.J., Fowler, T.R., Lynch, N.A., Strong, H.R.: An efficient algorithm for byzantine agreement without authentication. Information and Control 52(3), 257–274 (1982)
Feldman, P., Micali, S.: An optimal probabilistic protocol for synchronous byzantine agreement. SIAM Journal on Computing 26(4), 873–933 (1997)
Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. Journal of the ACM 32(2), 374–382 (1985)
Garay, J.A.: Reaching (and maintaining) agreement in the presence of mobile faults. In: Tel, G., Vitányi, P. (eds.) WDAG 1994. LNCS, vol. 857, pp. 253–264. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)
Lamport, L., Shostak, R., Pease, M.: The byzantine generals problem. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 4(3), 382–401 (1982)
Martin, J.P., Alvisi, L.: Fast byzantine consensus. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 3(3), 202–215 (2006)
Okun, M., Barak, A.: Efficient algorithms for anonymous byzantine agreement. Theory of Computing Systems 42(2), 222–238 (2008)
Ostrovsky, R., Yung, M.: How to withstand mobile virus attacks (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 1991), pp. 51–59 (1991)
Pease, M., Shostak, R., Lamport, L.: Reaching agreement in the presence of faults. Journal of the ACM 27(2), 228–234 (1980)
Raynal, M.: Fault-tolerant Agreement in Synchronous Message-passing Systems. Synthesis Lectures on Distributed Computing Theory. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2010)
Reischuk, R.: A new solution for the byzantine generals problem. Information and Control 64(1-3), 23–42 (1985)
Santoro, N., Widmayer, P.: Time is not a healer. In: Cori, R., Monien, B. (eds.) STACS 1989. LNCS, vol. 349, pp. 304–313. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)
Santoro, N., Widmayer, P.: Majority and unanimity in synchronous networks with ubiquitous dynamic faults. In: Pelc, A., Raynal, M. (eds.) SIROCCO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3499, pp. 262–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Sasaki, T., Yamauchi, Y., Kijima, S., Yamashita, M.: Mobile byzantine agreement on arbitrary network. In: Baldoni, R., Nisse, N., van Steen, M. (eds.) OPODIS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8304, pp. 236–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Schmid, U., Weiss, B., Keidar, I.: Impossibility results and lower bounds for consensus under link failures. SIAM Journal on Computing 38(5), 1912–1951 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bonnet, F., Défago, X., Nguyen, T.D., Potop-Butucaru, M. (2014). Tight Bound on Mobile Byzantine Agreement. In: Kuhn, F. (eds) Distributed Computing. DISC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8784. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45174-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45174-8_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45173-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45174-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)