Skip to main content

Conditional Preference Networks Support Multi-issue Negotiations with Mediator

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XVII

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TCCI,volume 8790))

Abstract

Conflicts of interest occur in various aspects of our daily life and we often come to an understanding by negotiating our way through these conflicts. This paper presents a simple interactive negotiation approach to resolve certain conflicts that involve multiple issues. The focus is on mediation to facilitate a solution based on alternating offers over a finite-time bargaining game. The mediator explores the possibilities and proposes a jointly optimal negotiation text for all the players participating in the negotiation process, based on their conditional preference networks (CP-nets). Each individual player then makes a decision to accept or reject the proposal based on their utility CP-nets. If any player rejects, the mediator offers another negotiation text and the process goes on until an agreement is achieved or some time limit is reached. Two algorithms are developed with regard to the players as well as the mediator, and a daily-life situation is investigated based on them. A historically important negotiation event has also been investigated using this model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Apt, K.R., Rossi, F., Venable, K.B.: CP-nets and Nash equilibria. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems (CIRAS), pp. 13–16 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aydogan, R., Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C., Yolum, P.: Heuristic-based approaches for CP-nets in negotiation. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiations (ACAN) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bacchus, F., Grove, A.: Graphical models for preference and utility. In: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI’95, pp. 3–10 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boutilier, C., Bacchus, F., Brafman, R.I.: UCP-networks: A directed graphical representation of conditional utilities. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-01), pp. 56–64 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boutilier, C., Brafman, R.I., Hoos, H.H., Poole, D.: CP-nets: a tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 21, 135–191 (2004)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Boutilier, C., Brafman, R.I., Hoos, H.H., Poole, D.: Preference-based constrained optimization with CP-nets. Comput. Intell. 20, 137–157 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chalamish, M., Kraus, S.: Automed: an automated mediator for multi-issue bilateral negotiations. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 24(3), 536–564 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ehtamo, H., Kettunen, E., Hamalainen, R.P.: Searching for joint gains in multi-party negotiations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130(1), 54–69 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Bargaining with incomplete information. Ann. Math. Artifi. Intell. 44(3), 207–232 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher, R.: International Mediation: A Working Guide. International Peace Academy, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Korhonen, P., Oretskin, N., Teich, J., Wallenius, J.: The impact of a biased starting position in a single negotiation text type mediation. Group Decis. Negot. 4, 357–374 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, M., Vo, Q.B., Kowalczyk, R.: Efficient heuristic approach to dominance testing in CP-nets. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 353–360 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, M., Vo, Q.B., Kowalczyk, R.: An efficient protocol for negotiation over combinatorial domains with incomplete information. In: Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), Barcelona, Spain. pp. 436–444 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, M., Vo, Q.B., Kowalczyk, R.: Majority-rule-based preference aggregation on multi-attribute domains with CP-nets, In: Tumer, K., Yolum, P., Sonenberg, L., Stone, P. (eds.) Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 659–666 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Z., Li, X., Guo, S., Liu, J.: A game tree algorithm for optimal outcome of CP-nets. Int. J. Digital Content Technol. Appl. (JDCTA) 6(4), 173–179 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oakman, J.: The Camp David Accords: A case study on international negotiation. Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Technical report (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Purrington, K., Durfee, E.H.: Agreeing on social outcomes using individual CP-nets. Multiagent and Grid Syst. 5(4), 409–425 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., Metcalfe, D.: Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rasmusen, E.: Games and Information, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, New Jersy (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Rossi, F., Venable, K.B., Walsh. T.: mCP nets: Representing and reasoning with preferences of multiple agents. In: Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 729–734 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Telhami, S.: Evaluating bargaining performance: the case of Camp David. Polit. Sci. Q. 107, 629–653 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the anonymous reviewers of ICAART 2013 as well as of Transactions CCI whose comments helped us to improve this paper. We also acknowledge NWO research grant 600.065.120.08N- 201, Vici grant NWO 227-80-001, and a Lotus II grant from the EU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujata Ghosh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ghosh, S., Kyaw, T.H., Verbrugge, R. (2014). Conditional Preference Networks Support Multi-issue Negotiations with Mediator. In: Nguyen, N., Kowalczyk, R., Fred, A., Joaquim, F. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XVII. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8790. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44994-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44994-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44993-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44994-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics