Skip to main content

Mass Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Automated Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teleophthalmology in Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Automated methods for mass screening of diabetic retinopathy can potentially address the limited sensitivity, higher cost, longer turnaround times, and low reproducibility of human readers. This chapter introduces the typical computer algorithms and imaging protocols that have been used to test and validate automated screening, as well as the diabetic retinopathy stages that are typically screened for. It explains the choices between higher sensitivity as a safety issue and higher productivity as an effectiveness issue and contains a review of all studies of mass screening with automated methods that are available in the scientific literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bragge P, Gruen RL, Chau M, Forbes A, Taylor HR. Screening for presence or absence of diabetic retinopathy: a meta-analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(4):435–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hazin R, Colyer M, Lum F, Barazi MK. Revisiting diabetes 2000: challenges in establishing nationwide diabetic retinopathy prevention programs. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(5):723–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. National Health Services, The English Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (United Kingdom). The NHS diabetic retinopathy programme: Annual report, 1 April 2007–31 March 2008. Gloucester: Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust and the English National Health Service; 2008 [cited 2014 Oct 10]. http://diabeticeye.screening.nhs.uk/getdata.php?id=10858.

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Health Services Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (United Kingdom);. Facts and Figures. Gloucester: NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programme. 2013 [cited 2014 Oct 10]. http://diabeticeye.screening.nhs.uk/statistics.

  6. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(5 Suppl):823–33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pugh JA, Jacobson JM, Van Heuven WA, Watters JA, Tuley MR, Lairson DR. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. The wide-angle retinal camera. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(6):889–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lawrence MG. The accuracy of digital-video retinal imaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy: an analysis of two digital-video retinal imaging systems using standard stereoscopic seven-field photography and dilated clinical examination as reference standards. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2004;102:321–40.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin DY, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(2):204–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Emanuele N, Klein R, Moritz T, Davis MD, Glander K, Anderson R, et al. Comparison of dilated fundus examinations with seven-field stereo fundus photographs in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial. J Diabetes Complications. 2009;23(5):323–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruamviboonsuk P, Teerasuwanajak K, Tiensuwan M, Yuttitham K, Thai Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(5):826–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abramoff MD, Garvin M, Sonka M. Retinal imaging and image analysis. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2010;3:169–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abràmoff MD, Folk JC, Han DP, Walker JD, Williams DF, Russell SR, et al. Automated analysis of retinal images for detection of referable diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(3):351–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abràmoff MD, Niemeijer M, Suttorp-Schulten MS, Viergever MA, Russell SR, van Ginneken B. Evaluation of a system for automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy from color fundus photographs in a large population of patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(2):193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abràmoff MD, Reinhardt JM, Russell SR, Folk JC, Mahajan VB, Niemeijer M, et al. Automated early detection of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(6):1147–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fleming AD, Goatman KA, Philip S, Prescott GJ, Sharp PF, Olson JA. Automated grading for diabetic retinopathy: a large-scale audit using arbitration by clinical experts. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(12):1606–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goatman K, Charnley A, Webster L, Nussey S. Assessment of automated disease detection in diabetic retinopathy screening using two-field photography. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):27524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scotland GS, McNamee P, Fleming AD, Goatman KA, Philip S, Prescott GJ, et al. Costs and consequences of automated algorithms versus manual grading for the detection of referable diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(6):712–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scotland GS, McNamee P, Philip S, Fleming AD, Goatman KA, Prescott GJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of implementing automated grading within the national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy in Scotland. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(11):1518–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Niemeijer M, van Ginneken B, Cree MJ, Mizutani A, Quellec G, Sanchez CI, et al. Retinopathy online challenge: automatic detection of microaneurysms in digital color fundus photographs. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29(1):185–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Winder RJ, Morrow PJ, McRitchie IN, Bailie JR, Hart PM. Algorithms for digital image processing in diabetic retinopathy. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2009;33(8):608–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Teng T, Lefley M, Claremont D. Progress towards automated diabetic ocular screening: a review of image analysis and intelligent systems for diabetic retinopathy. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2002;40(1):2–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Four risk factors for severe visual loss in diabetic retinopathy. The third report from the Diabetic Retinopathy Study. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97(4):654–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, Stratton IM, Manley SE, Holman RR, Matthews DR, et al. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, 30: diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(3):297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilkinson CP, Ferris 3rd FL, Klein RE, Lee PP, Agardh CD, Davis M, et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(9):1677–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(12):1796–806.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, Boyer DS, Patel S, Feiner L, et al. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(4):789–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mitchell P, Bandello F, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lang GE, Massin P, Schlingemann RO, et al. The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4):615–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, et al. Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(6):1064–77.e35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. National Screening Programme for Diabetic Retinopathy Workbook 4.3, updated 2009. UK National Screening Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kocher R, Sahni N. Rethinking health care labor. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1370–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Davis MD, Fisher MR, Gangnon RE, Barton F, Aiello LM, Chew EY, et al. Risk factors for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy and severe visual loss: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report #18. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(2):233–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McNeil BJ, Hanley JA. Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Decis Making. 1984;4(2):137–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Javitt JC, Canner JK, Sommer A. Cost effectiveness of current approaches to the control of retinopathy in type I diabetics. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(2):255–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Diabetic Retinopathy. Canberra, Australia: NHMRC; 1997 [cited 2010 Oct.10]. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/cp53.pdf.

  36. Ahmed J, Ward TP, Bursell SE, Aiello LM, Cavallerano JD, Vigersky RA. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(10):2205–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cavallerano JD, Aiello LP, Cavallerano AA, Katalinic P, Hock K, Kirby R, et al. Nonmydriatic digital imaging alternative for annual retinal examination in persons with previously documented no or mild diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(4):667–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chew EY. Screening options for diabetic retinopathy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(6):519–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kernt M, et al. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using nonmydriatic ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap) compared with ETDRS 7-field stereo photography. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(12):2459–63.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sohn EH, Chen JJ, Lee K, Niemeijer M, Sonka M, Abràmoff MD. Reproducibility of diabetic macular edema estimates from SD-OCT is affected by the choice of image analysis algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(6):4184–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Baudoin CE, Lay BJ, Klein JC. Automatic detection of microaneurysms in diabetic fluorescein angiography. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1984;32(3–4):254–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Spencer T, Olson JA, McHardy KC, Sharp PF, Forrester JV. An image-processing strategy for the segmentation and quantification of microaneurysms in fluorescein angiograms of the ocular fundus. Comput Biomed Res. 1996;29(4):284–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Niemeijer M, van Ginneken B, Staal J, Suttorp-Schulten MS, Abràmoff MD. Automatic detection of red lesions in digital color fundus photographs. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005;24(5):584–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fleming AD, Philip S, Goatman KA, Olson JA, Sharp PF. Automated microaneurysm detection using local contrast normalization and local vessel detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006;25(9):1223–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Agurto C, Barriga ES, Murray V, Nemeth S, Crammer R, Bauman W, et al. Automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration in digital fundus images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(8):5862–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Abramoff MD, Suttorp-Schulten MS. Web-based screening for diabetic retinopathy in a primary care population: the EyeCheck project. Telemed J E Health. 2005;11(6):668–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dupas B, et al. Evaluation of automated fundus photograph analysis algorithms for detecting microaneurysms, haemorrhages and exudates, and of a computer-assisted diagnostic system for grading diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Metab. 2010;36(3):213–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jelinek HJ, et al. An automated microaneurysm detector as a tool for identification of diabetic retinopathy in rural optometric practice. Clin Exp Optom. 2006;89(5):299–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Philip S, Fleming AD, Goatman KA, Fonseca S, McNamee P, Scotland GS, et al. The efficacy of automated “disease/no disease” grading for diabetic retinopathy in a systematic screening programme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(11):1512–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sánchez CI, Niemeijer M, Dumitrescu AV, Suttorp-Schulten MS, Abràmoff MD, van Ginneken B. Evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system for diabetic retinopathy screening on public data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:4866–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Usher D, Dumskyj M, Himaga M, Williamson TH, Nussey S, Boyce J. Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy in digital retinal images: a tool for diabetic retinopathy screening. Diabet Med. 2004;21(1):84–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Fleming AD, Olson JA, Sharp PF, Goatman KA, Philip S. Response to ‘Improved automated screening of diabetic retinopathy’ by Carlos M Oliveira et al. Ophthalmologica. 2012;227(3):173; author reply 174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Oliveira CM, Cristóvão LM, Ribeiro ML, Abreu JR. Improved automated screening of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmologica. 2011;226(4):191–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meindert Niemeijer PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abràmoff, M.D., Niemeijer, M. (2015). Mass Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Automated Methods. In: Michelson, G. (eds) Teleophthalmology in Preventive Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44975-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44975-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44974-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44975-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics