Skip to main content

Note-Taking in Pupil’s Textbook: Features and Influence Factors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Learning Environments

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

  • 1560 Accesses

Abstract

As an important learning strategy, note-taking has been drawing researchers’ attention for a long time. This research analyzes features and influence factors of note-taking in used Chinese language and Mathematics textbooks for primary schools through content analysis approach and interview approach leading to the following results. Firstly, the features of note-taking in the textbooks embody in three aspects of the forms, locations, and contents of note-taking. Secondly, the important influence factors of note-taking contain individual initiatives, teachers’ lecturing speed, and the difficulty of contents. Thirdly, the note-taking contents have obvious diversities in disciplines and grade sections. Fourthly, the textbook is an important cognitive tool for pupils’ study and an important mediator for family-school communication. Fifthly, teachers have to guide pupils to develop good habits of note-taking. Sixthly, the design of note-taking function for e-textbook should take the features of note-taking in printed textbooks into consideration with the enrichment of note-taking forms and providing different note-taking tools, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • An, S., Kulm, G., & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school, mathematics teachers in China and the U.S. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(2), 145–172. doi:10.1023/B:JMTE.0000021943.35739.1c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabanac, G., Chevalier, M., Chrisment, C., & Julien, C. (2007). Collective annotation: perspectives for information retrieval improvement, RIAO 2007. In Presented at the in Proceedings of the 8 th Conference on Large-Scale Semantic Access to Content (Text, Image, Video and Sound), Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved from http://riao.free.fr/papers/99.pdf.

  • Chen, C.-H., & Chiu, C.-H. (2011). Integrating blogs into elementary classrooms: shared note taking and questioning review (Vol. 5, pp. 1627–1631). Presented at the Proceedings of 2011, 15th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education (GCCCE2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Gong, C., & Huang, R. (2012). E-textbook: definition, functions and key technical issues. Open Education Research, 18(2), 28–32. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, C., Chen, G., Huang, R., & Zhang, J. (2011). The development process of e-textbook for k-12 schools in South Korea and its inspiration to China. In Presented at the 2011 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering, Yichang, China (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, C., Wehling, U., & Rothkugel, S. (2009). From paper-and-pen annotations to artefact-based mobile learning. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 25(3), 219–237. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00297.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., Chen, G., Zhang, J., & Wang, Y. (2010). research on informationization learning mode and its digital resource form. Modern Distance Education Research, 6, 68–73. doi:CNKI:SUN:XDYC.0.2010-06-018 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., Baek, J. Y., et al. (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education: innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating note taking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 23–32. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2001_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1(2), 147–172. doi:10.1007/BF01326640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewra, K. A., Dubois, N. F., Christian, D., Mcshane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 240–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. (2003). Cognitive pscyholinguistic approach to the function of note-taking. Modern Foreign Language, 26(2), 193–199. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. C. (1998). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia: Links, Objects, Time and Space—structure in Hypermedia Systems: Links, Objects, Time and Space—structure in Hypermedia Systems (pp. 40–49). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/276627.276632.

  • McFall, R. (2005). Electronic textbooks that transform how textbooks are used. The Electronic Library, 23(1), 72–81. doi:10.1108/02640470510582754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, D. A., Foreman, K. B., Goede, P. A., Bezzant, J. L., & Albertine, K. H. (2007). TK3 eBook software to author, distribute, and use electronic course content for medical education. Advances in Physiology Education, 31(1), 55–61. doi:10.1152/advan.00036.2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou, Y., & Yang, H. (1998). Transformation of curriculum in new century—from the perspective of Mainland China and Taiwan. Taipei: Wu-Nan Book Inc. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 34–38. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.1.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickards, J. P., & Friedman, F. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3(2), 136–143. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(78)90020-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. (2009). Functions of Annotation Notes in Reading. Reference for Elementary Education, (4), 24 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, M. (2011). Student attitudes and behaviors towards digital textbooks. Publishing Research Quarterly, 27(2), 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z. (1988). Review on cognitive researches of note-taking in classroom. Advances in Psychological Science, 2, 36–39. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work is supported by National Social Science Foundation of China 2011 project “Curriculum: e-Textbook for middle school” (Fund No. CCA110107).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaohua Gong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, G., Gong, C., Huang, R. (2015). Note-Taking in Pupil’s Textbook: Features and Influence Factors. In: Chang, M., Li, Y. (eds) Smart Learning Environments. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44447-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44447-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44446-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44447-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics