Skip to main content
  • 9454 Accesses

Abstract

When we design and investigate an artifact in context, we need a conceptual framework to define structures in the artifact and its context. In Sect. 8.1, we look at two different kinds of conceptual structures, namely, architectural and statistical structures. In information systems and software engineering research, the context of the artifact often contains people, and researchers usually share concepts with them. This creates a reflective conceptual structure that is typical of social research, discussed in Sect. 8.2. Conceptual frameworks are tools for the mind, and the functions of conceptual frameworks are discussed in Sect. 8.3. In order to measure constructs, we have to operationalize them. This is subject to the requirements of construct validity, discussed in Sect. 8.4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. W. Bechtel, A. Abrahamsen, Explanation: a mechanistic alternative. Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 36, 421–441 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Bettenburg, A.E. Hassan, Studying the impact of social interactions on software quality. Empir. Softw. Eng. 18(2), 375–431 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Borgida, V. Chaudhri, P. Giorgini, E. Yu, Conceptual Modelling: Foundations and Applications (Springer, Heidelberg, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Clements, F. Bachmann, L. Bass, D. Garlan, J. Ivers, R. Little, P. Merson, R. Nord, J. Stafford, Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond, 2nd edn. (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.J. Dijksterhuis, The Mechanization of the World Picture (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1961). Transl. C. Dikshoorn

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Engelsman, R.J. Wieringa, Goal-oriented requirements engineering and enterprise architecture: Two case studies and some lessons learned, in Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2012), Essen, Germany. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7195 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2012), pp. 306–320

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Freedman, R. Pisani, R. Purves, Statistics, 4th edn. (Norton & Company, New York, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Gordon, History and Philosophy of Social Science (Routledge, London, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Hildebrand, G. Häubl, A. Herrmann, J.R. Landwher, When social media can be bad for you: Community feedback stifles consumer creativity and reduces satisfaction with self-designed products. Inf. Syst. Res. 24(1), 14–29 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Hofmeister, R. Nord, D. Soni, Applied Software Architecture (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Huynh, J. Miller, An empirical investigation into open source web applications’ implementation vulnerabilities. Empir. Softw. Eng. 15(5), 556–576 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M.A. Jackson, Problem Frames: Analysing and Structuring Software Development Problems (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Kaschek, L. Delcambre (eds.), The Evolution of Conceptual Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6520 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Li, N.H. Madhavji, S.S. Murtaza, M. Gittens, A.V. Miranskyy, D. Godwin, E. Cialini, Characteristics of multiple-component defects and architectural hotspots: A large system case study. Empir. Softw. Eng. 16, 667–702 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Machamer, L. Darden, C.F. Craver, Thinking about mechanisms. Philos. Sci. 67, 1–25 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Makkreel, Wilhem Dilthey, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by E.N. Zalta. Summer 2012 Edition (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Morgan, Images of Organization (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.W. ter Mors, The World According to MARP. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, 2010. http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/~adriaan/pubs/terMorsPhDthesis.pdf

  19. A. Olivé. Conceptual Modeling of Information Systems (Springer, Heidelberg, 2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Poli, J. Seibt, M. Healy, A. Kameas (eds.), Theory and Applications of Ontology. Computer Applications, vol. 2 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Z. Racheva, M. Daneva, A. Herrmann, K. Sikkel, R.J. Wieringa, Do we know enough about requirements prioritization in agile projects: Insights from a case study, in 18th International IEEE Requirements Engineering Conference, Sydney (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 2010), pp. 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  22. N.F.M. Roozenburg, J. Eekels, Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods (Wiley, Boston, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Sayer, Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2nd edn. (Routledge, London, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  24. W.R. Shadish, T.D. Cook, D.T. Campbell, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Shaw, D. Garlan, Software Architecture: Perspective on an Emerging Discipline (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. H.A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  27. D.I.K. Sjøberg, T. Dybå, M. Jörgensen, The future of empirical methods in software engineering research, in Future of Software Engineering (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 2007), pp. 358–378

    Google Scholar 

  28. L. Wasserman, All of Statistics. A Concise Course in Statistical Inference (Springer, Heidelberg, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. R.S. Westfall, The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanisms and Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005); First printing Wiley, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. Wieringa, Real-world semantics of conceptual models, in The Evolution of Conceptual Modeling, ed. by R. Kaschek, L. Delcambre. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6520 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  31. R.J. Wieringa, Design Methods for Reactive Systems: Yourdon, Statemate and the UML (Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. R.J. Wieringa, W. de Jonge, Object identifiers, keys, and surrogates—object identifiers revisited. Theory Pract. Object Syst. 1(2), 101–114 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wieringa, R.J. (2014). Conceptual Frameworks. In: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43838-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43839-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics