Skip to main content

Linear Programming Tests of Regularity Conditions for Production Functions

  • Conference paper
Quantitative Studies on Production and Prices

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to extend the nonparametric tests of regularity conditions on production functions and the related tests for the consistency of a data set with the hypothesis of productive efficiency or with the hypotheses of cost minimizing or profit maximizing behavior suggested by Afriat [1972] and Hanoch/’Rothschild [1972]. The tests suggested by these authors can be regarded as extensions of some tests due to Farrell [1957] and Farrell/Fieldhouse [1962]. Typically these tests involve the solution of a number of linear programming problems where the objective functions and the constraint functions are known functions of the given data; hence the title of the present paper.

The authors are indebted to C. Blackorby for helpful comments and to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for financial support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Afriat, S.N.: The Construction of Separable Utility Functions from Expenditure Data. Mimeographed, Purdue University, Lafayette 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afriat, S.N.: Efficiency Estimation of Production Functions. International Economic Review 13, 1972, 568–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aigner, D., C.A.K. Lovell and P. Schmidt: Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models. Journal of Econometrics 6, 1977, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig, G.B.: Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton, N.J., 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G.: The Coefficient of Resource Utilization. Econometrica 19, 1951, 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E.: Functional Forms for Profit and Transformation Functions. Journal of Economic Theory 6, 1973a, 284–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E.: Afriat and Revealed Preference Theory. Review of Economic Studies 40, 1973b, 419–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E.: Functional Forms Revenue and Factor Requirements Functions. International Economic Review 15, 1974, 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E.: Exact and Superlative Index Numbers. Journal of Econometrics 4, 1976, 115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E.: Duality Approaches to Microeconomic Theory. Discussion Paper 78–09, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, March 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., and C.A.K. Lovell: Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Production. Journal of Economic Theory 19, 1978, 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., C.A.K. Lovell and K. Zieschang: Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Multiple Output Production Technologies. Quantitative Studies on Production and Prices. Ed. by W. Eichhorn et al. Würzburg-Wien 1982 (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M.J.: The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 120, 1957, 251–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M.J., and M. Fieldhouse: Estimating Efficient Production Functions under Increasing Returns to Scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 125, 1962, 252–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W.M.: Measuring the Quantities of Fixed Factors. In Value, Capital and Growth: Papers in honour of Sir John Hicks. Ed. by J.N. Wolfe. Chicago 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch, G., and M. Rothschild: Testing the Assumptions of Production Theory: A Nonparametric Approach. Journal of Political Economy 80, 1972, 256, 275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W., and Z. Grilliches: The Explanation of Productivity Change. Review of Economic Studies 34, 1967, 240–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konus, A.A.: The Problem of the True Index of the Cost of Living. Econometrica 7, 1939, 10–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, L.J.: A Characterization of the Normalized Restricted Profit Function. Journal of Economic Theory 12, 1976, 131–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D.: Cost, Revenue and Profit Functions: A Cursory Review. Working Paper No. 86, IBER, University of California, Berkeley 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D.: Cost, Revenue and Profit Functions. Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Vol. 1. Ed. by M. Fuss and D. McFadden. Amsterdam 1978, 3–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex Analysis. Princeton, N.J., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A.: Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Diewert, W.E., Parkan, C. (1983). Linear Programming Tests of Regularity Conditions for Production Functions. In: Eichhorn, W., Henn, R., Neumann, K., Shephard, R.W. (eds) Quantitative Studies on Production and Prices. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41526-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41526-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0275-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-41526-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics