Skip to main content

Abstract

In the middle fifties many American firms were confronted with disturbing symptoms which could not be readily remedied by available management techniques and which had no precedent in recent experience. For some firms the market demand began to level off and could not be restimulated by even the most energetic marketing and promotion. For others the demand began to decline in the face of substitute products offered by new technologies. Still others saw their traditional markets invaded by vigorous foreign competitors [1].

This article is reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons Ltd. from Ansoff. H.I. et al. (ed.): From Strategic Planning to Strategic Management, London-New York-Sydney-Toronto 1976.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ansoff, HJ.: Management on the threshold of the Post-Industrial Era. Challenge to Leadership, Managing in a Changing World, the Conference Board, New York 1973a.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ansoff HJ.: Toward a strategic theory of firms. Business Strategy. Ed. by H.I.Ansoff. Harmondsworth 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ringbakk, L.A.: Organized planning in major U.S. companies. Long-Range Planning Journal 2 (2), December 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A typical experience was encountered by one of the authors in a billion-dollar American company, which prepared some five years ago a six-inch thick Corporate Strategic Plan. The planning Effort so exhausted the planning staff, and so depleted its goodwill with operating managers, that no effort was made at subsequent revision. Some four years later the chairman said at a top management meeting ‘I suppose we should do something about strategic planning. But, let’s not revise that damned thing again’.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schick, A.: Systems politics and systems budgeting. Public Administration Review 29 (2), March/April 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schick, A.: A death in the bureaucracy: the demise of Federal PPB. Public Administration Review (146), March/April 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ansoff, HJ.: The next twenty years in management education. The Library Quarterly, Chicago, University of Chicago Press 43 (4), October 1973b.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ansoff H.I.: Managerial problem-solving. Management Science in Planning and Control. Ed. by Jr.Blook. The Technical Association Publication No. 5, New York 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ansoff, HJ., and R.L. Hayes: Role of models in corporate decision-making. Operational Research. Ed. by M. Ross. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cordtz, D.: Face in the Mirror at GM. Fortune 74 (116), August 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Drucker, R: The Age of Discontinuity. New York 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Toffler, A.: Future Shock. New York 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ansoff HJ.: Corporate Strategy. New York 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  14. It should be made clear that for most firms there will not be one but many competitive environments. The analysis would be performed for each. This issue is discussed in a later section.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ‘Harnessing the R & D monster’. Fortune LXXXI (1), 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ansoff, HJ., and R.G.Brandenburg: A language for organization design. Management Science 17 (12), August 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ansoff, HJ.: Corporate structure present and future. Paper presented at the International Congress of Corporate Planers. Brussels 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  18. This section is adapted from Ansoff [16].

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chandler, A.D.: Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, Mass., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lindbloom, C.E.: The science of muddling through. Business strategy. Ed. by H.I.Ansoff. Harmondsworth 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cyert, R., and J. G.March: The Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Which is typical of successful crisis managers and which was recently described by a famous politician struggling for personal survival by the words: ‘The hotter it gets the cooler I get’.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ansoff, HJ.: Strategic Posture Analysis Exercises. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ansoff, H.I., Declerck, R.P., Hayes, R.L. (1997). From Strategic Planning to Strategic Management. In: Hahn, D., Taylor, B. (eds) Strategische Unternehmungsplanung / Strategische Unternehmungsführung. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41482-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41482-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-41483-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-41482-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics