Skip to main content

Abstract

It is evident that definite relationships must exist between the individual processes occurring in a developing organism, but few attempts have been made to develop a general theoretical treatment of these relationships, and even the word “correlation” has been used in quite opposite senses. Some authors apply the term to almost any relationship between two features of a plant, while others reserve it for cases in which they suppose some special physiological mechanism to exist, a system which is concerned to keep the various parts of the plant in step and which is resistant to external interference. The two usages are quite incompatible. For consider the relationship between the shoot and root of a plant. There is pretty general agreement that if the supply of minerals is mildly deficient the roots will take what they need, so that the deficiency will have a disproportionately harmful effect upon the shoot. Conversely if photosynthesis is hindered it is the root system which will show the greatest effect. These phenomena have been discussed as examples of “correlation”. But anybody who thinks of a correlation as the work of a special regulating mechanism must argue that if the shoot/root ratio can be so easily altered by changing the conditions, then there is a very conspicuous lack of correlation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  • Ashby, E.: Studies in the morphogenesis of leaves. VI. Some effects of length of day upon leaf shape in Ipomoea caerulea. New Phytologist 49, 375–387 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, V. H.: The compound interest law and plant growth. Ann. Bot. 33, 353–360 (1919).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J. T.: Morphogenesis. Princeton: Univ. Press 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, R. H.: A further contribution to the study of right-and left-handedness. J. Genet. 2, 53–70 (1912).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dormer, K. J.: Some geometrical considerations regarding imbricate aestivation. Nature (Lond.) 162, 653 (1948).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • A quantitative study of shoot development in Vicia faba. I. The xylem of the plumule. Ann Bot., N. S. 14, 421–434 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • A quantitative study of shoot development in Vicia faba. Iii. The dry weights of the plumular internodes. Aim. Bot., N. S. 15, 289–303 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Observations on the symmetry of the shoot in Vicia faba and some allied species, and on the transmission of some morphogenetic impulses. Ann. Bot., N. S. 18, 55–70 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormer, K. J., and J. A. Bentley: Some complex relationships between auxin content and leaf area in Ipomoea caerulea Koen. New Phytologist 51, 116–126 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormer, K. J., and E. G. Cutter: On the arrangement of flowers on the rhizomes of some Nymphaeaceae. New Phytologist 58, 176–181 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dormer, K. J. and J. Hucker: Observations on the occurrence of prickles on the leaves of Ilex aquifolium. Ann. Bot., N. S. 21, 385–398 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormer, K. J., and R. L. Plack: A quantitative study of shoot development in Vicia faba. II. The elongation of internode and petiole. Ann. Bot., N. S. 15, 157–173 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • EwArt, A. J.: The influence of correlation upon the size of leaves. Ann. Bot. 20, 79–82 (1906).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, S.: The American species of Hemicarpha. Amer. J. Bot. 28, 855–861 (1941).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompertz, B.: On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new method of determining the value of life contingencies. Phil. Trans. roy. Soc. B 115, 513–585 (1825).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J.: The kinetics of growth. Brit. J. exp. Biol. 6, 248–274 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom, P.: Longitudinal symmetry in phanerogamia. Phil. Trans. roy. Soc. B 200, 57–115 (1908).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The longitudinal symmetry of the Centrospermae. Trans. Linn. Soc. (Lond.), Bot., 7,267–302 (1909).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hering, F.: Über Wachsthumscorrelationen infolge mechanischer Hemmung des Wachsens. Jb. wiss. Bot. 29, 132–170 (1896).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. S.: Constant differential growth ratios. Nature (Lond.) 114, 895–896 (1924).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JAcoBs, W. P., and B. Bullwinkel• Compensatory growth in Coleus shoots. Amer. J. Bot. 40, 385–392 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macloskie, G.: Antidromy in plants. Amer. Naturalist 29, 973–978 (1895 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Antidromy in plants. Bull. Torrey bot. Club 22, 379–387 (1895b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham, J.: Biochemistry and morphogenesis. Cambridge: Univ. Press. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono, H., and H. Suemoto: The right-and left-handedness of seedlings in Triticum. Seiken Zihô 8, 60–66 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, W. H.: Growth studies. IV. Correlations in development. Ann. Bot. 37, 261–275 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Growth studies. VI. On the relative sizes of growing plant organs. Ann. Bot. 41, 549–556 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, R.: Validity of equations for relative growth constants when applied to sigmoid growth curves. Bull. Torrey bot. Club 68, 295–304 (1941).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunkiaer, C • Über Homodromie und Antidromie, insbesondere bei Gramineen. Kgl. Danske Vidensk. Sellsk. Biol. Medd. 1, No. 12 (1919).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, L.A. M.: Variable aestivation of Ranunculus bulbosus and R. acer. J. Bot. 61, 209–212 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, R. C.: On the nature of hereditary size limitation. II. The growth of parts in relation to the whole. Brit. J. exp. Biol. 6, 311–324 (1929).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmucker, T.: Rechts-und Linkstendenz bei Pflanzen. Beih. bot. Zbl. 41 I, 51–81 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoute, J. C.: On corolla aestivation and phyllotaxis of floral phyllomes. Verh. kon. ned. Akad. Wet. Amst., 2. Sect., Afvd. Natuurk. 34, No 4, (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. Darcy: Growth and form, 2nd edn. New York: MacMillan 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsor, C. P.: The Gompertz curve as a growth curve. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 18, 1–8 (1932).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1965 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dormer, K.J. (1965). Correlations in plant development: general and basic aspects. In: Allsopp, A., et al. Differentiation and Development / Differenzierung und Entwicklung. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology / Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-36273-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-36273-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-35445-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-36273-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics