Skip to main content

Why Upwinding is Reasonable

  • Conference paper
Finite Elements in Water Resources

Abstract

Upwind-biased discrete approximations have a distinguished history in numerical fluid mechanics, dating at least to von Neumann and Richtmyer (1950). Lately, however, upwinding has come under fire in water resources engineering. Among the most effective critics of upwind techniques are Gresho and Lee (1980), who take umbrage at the smearing of steep gradients in solutions of partial differential equations. While this viewpoint has cogency, a blanket condemnation of upwinding would be injudicious. There exist fluid flows for which upstream-biased discretizations are not only valid but in fact mathematically more appropriate than central approximations having higher-order accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, M.B. (to appear), ‘How upstream collocation works,“ Int. J. Num. Meth. Engrg.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, M.B., and Pinder, C.F. (1983), “Collocation simulation of multiphase porous-medium flow,’ Soc. Pet. Eng. J. ( February ), 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aziz, K., and Settari, A. (1979), Petroleum Reservoir Simulation, London: Applied Science.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ewing, R. (to appear), ‘Adaptive mesh refinement in reservoir simulation applications,’ to be presented at the International Conference on Accuracy Estimates and Adaptive Refinement in Finite Element Computations, Lisbon, Portugal, June, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gresho, P.M., and Lee, R.L. (1980), “Don’t suppress the wiggles-they’re telling you something!’, in Finite Element Methods for Convection Dominated Flows, ed. by T.J.R. Hughes, New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heinrich, J.C., Huyakorn, P.S., Zienkiewicz, O.C., and Mitchell, A.R. (1977), “An ‘upwind’ finite element scheme for two-dimensional convective transport equation,’ Int. J. Num. Meth. Engrg. 11, 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hughes, T.J.R. (1978), ‘A simple scheme for developing upwind finite elements,’ Int. J. Num. Meth. Engrg. 12, 1359–1365.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huyakorn, P.S., and Pinder, G.F. (1978), “A new finite element technique for the solution of two-phase flow through porous media,’ Adv. Water Resources 1: 5, 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jensen, O.K., and Finlayson, B.A. (1980), ’ Oscillation limits for weighted residual methods applied to convective diffusion equations,“ Int. J. Num. Meth. Engrg. 15, 1681–1689.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mercer, J.W., and Faust, C.R. (1977), ‘The application of finite-element techniques to immiscible flow in porous media,’ presented at the First International Conference on Finite Elements in Water Resources, Princeton, Nj, July, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nakano, Y. (1980), ‘Application of recent results in functional analysis to the problem of wetting fronts,’ Water Res. Research 16, 314–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oleinik, O.A. (1963), ‘Construction of a generalized solution of the Cauchy problem for a quasi-linear equation of the first order by the introduction of a ‘vanishing viscosity’,“ Am. Math. Soc. Trans!. (Ser. 2), 33, 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prenter, P.M. (1975), Splines and Variational Methods, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shapiro, A.M., and Pinder, C.F. (1981), “Analysis of an upstream weighted approximation to the transport equation,’ J. Comp. Phys. 39, 46–71.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shapiro, A.M., and Pinder, G.F. (1982), “Solution of immiscible displacement in porous media using the collocation finite element method,’ presented at the Fourth International Conference on Finite Elements in Water Resources, Hannover, FRG, June, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Von Neumann, j., and Richtmyer, R.D. (1950), “A method for the numerical calculations of hydrodynamical shocks,” J. Appl. Phys. 21, 232–237.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Whitman, G.B. (1974), Linear and Nonlinear Waves, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Allen, M.B. (1984). Why Upwinding is Reasonable. In: Laible, J.P., Brebbia, C.A., Gray, W., Pinder, G. (eds) Finite Elements in Water Resources. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11744-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11744-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-11746-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-11744-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics