Skip to main content

Social decision rules are not immune to conflict

  • Chapter
Conflict and Governance
  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

Why is rent-seeking so endemic in societies? Might it not be possible to design a Pareto-improving social decision rule that sidesteps the inefficient waste of resources resulting from conflict? We study this question for a multiplayer contest. We assume that a benevolent planner knows the winning payoffs, the effectiveness of each rent-seeker, that the cost of expending resources is isoelastic, and that it is the same across all players. But she does not know the precise value of this elasticity. We show that this minimal lack of information leads to the impossibility of a Pareto-improving social decision rule, as long as there are at least four agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anbarci, N., Skaperdas, S. and Syropoulos, C. (1999) Comparing Bargaining Solutions in the Shadow of Conflict. Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteban, J. and Ray, D. (1999a) Conflict and distribution. Journal of Economic Theory 87: 379–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban, J. and Ray, D. (1999b) Collective Action and the Group Size Paradox. Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E. (1985) The Theory of Implementation in Nash Equilibrium: a Survey. In: Hurwicz, L., Schmeidler, D. and Sonnenschein, H. (eds.) Social Goals and Social Organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1992) Implementation, Contracts and Renegotiation in Environments with Complete Information. In: Laffont, J.J. (ed.) Advances in Economic Theory, VI World Congress of the Econometric Society (vol. I). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1999) The Proportional Random Allocation of Indivisible Units. Mimeo. Department of Economics, Rice University

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaperdas, S. (1995) Contest success functions. Economic Theory 7: 283–290

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Esteban, J., Ray, D. (2003). Social decision rules are not immune to conflict. In: Glazer, A., Konrad, K.A. (eds) Conflict and Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05121-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05121-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05527-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05121-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics