Skip to main content

The Structural Basis of Oocyte-Granulosa Cell Communication

  • Conference paper
The Future of the Oocyte

Part of the book series: Ernst Schering Research Foundation Workshop ((SCHERING FOUND,volume 41))

Abstract

The ontogeny of female germ cells in animals encompasses phases of prolonged storage, rapid growth and maturation, and mechanisms for releasing oocytes from the ovary (Wallace and Selman 1990). Ovarian follicles provide the multicellular unit for prolonged storage of oocytes both prior to and during the reproductive lifespan of females. The follicle, formed by the physical interaction of oocytes and granulosa cells, supports the rapid growth and maturation of oocytes (Canipari 1994). To accomplish this, the somatic granulosa cells surrounding the oocyte undergo periodic changes in structure and function that concurrently attend the needs of the developing oocyte and organismal reproductive cyclicity. The physical linkage between female germ cells and the ovarian soma is finally interrupted during the process of ovulation, even though in many animals the oocyte is released with somatic cells attached to the oolemma or investing extracellular matrices (Suzuki et al. 2000). Thus, from both a phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspective, oogenesis clearly involves a protracted period of contact between the oocyte and surrounding follicle cells. The morphological and physiological relevance of oocyte—granulosa cell contact in the mammalian ovary is considered below with reference to the form, composition and functions subserved by specialized structures known as transzonal projections (TZPs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albertini DF, Kravit NG (1981) Isolation and biochemical characterization of ten-nanometer filaments from cultured ovarian granulosa cells. J Biol Chem 256: 2484–2492

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albertini DF, Rider V (1994) Patterns of intercellular connectivity in the mammalian cumulus-oocyte complex. Microsc Res Tech 27: 125–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albertini DF, Combelles CM, Benecchi E, Carabatsos MJ (2001) Cellular basis for paracrine regulation of ovarian follicle development. Reproduction 121: 647–653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allworth AE, Albertini DF (1993) Meiotic maturation in cultured bovine oocytes is accompanied by remodeling of the cumulus cell cytoskeleton. Dev Biol 158: 101–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E, Albertini DF (1976) Gap junctions between the oocyte and companion follicle cells in the mammalian ovary. J Cell Biol 71: 680–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt RC, Matheson RL (1982) Gap junction amplification in rat ovarian granulosa cells. I. A direct response to follicle-stimulating hormone. Dev Biol 94: 206–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Can A, Holmes RM, Albertini DF (1997) Analysis of the mammalian ovary by confocal microscopy. In: Motta PM (ed) Microscopy of reproduction and development: a dynamic approach. Antonio Delfino Editore, Rome, pp 101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Canipari R (1994) Cell-cell interactions and oocyte growth. Zygote 2: 343–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carabatsos MJ, Sellitto C, Goodenough DA, Albertini DF (2000) Oocytegranulosa cell heterologous gap junctions are required for the coordination of nuclear and cytoplasmic meiotic competence. Dev Biol 226: 167–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Combelles CM, Cekieniak NA, Racowsky C, Albertini DF (2002) Assessment of nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation in in vitro matured human oocytes. Hum Reprod 17: 1006–1016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Czernobilsky B, Moll R, Levy R, Franke WW (1985) Co-expression of cytokeratin and vimentin filaments in mesothelial, granulosa and rete ovarii cells of the human ovary. Eur J Cell Biol 37: 175–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Smedt V, Szollosi D (1991) Cytochalasin D treatment induces meiotic re-sumption in follicular sheep oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 29: 163–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagotto F, Gumbiner BM (1996) Cell contact-dependent signaling. Dev Biol 180: 445–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gall L, De Smedt V, Ruffini, S (1992) Co-expression of cytokeratins and vimentin in sheep cumulus-oocyte complexes. Alteration of intermediate filament distribution by acrylamide. Dev Growth Differ 34: 579–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Grazul-Bilska AT, Reynolds LP, Redmer DA (1997) Gap junctions in the ovaries. Biol Reprod 57: 947–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse J, Bulling A, Brucker C, Berg U, Amsterdam A, Mayerhofer A, Gratzl M (2000) Synaptosome-associated protein of 25 kilodaltons in oocytes and steroid-producing cells of rat and human ovary: molecular analysis and regulation by gonadotropins. Biol Reprod 63: 643–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herman B, Albertini DF (1983) Microtubule regulation of cell surface receptor topography during granulosa cell differentiation. Differentiation 25: 56–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hertig AT, Adams EC (1967) Studies on the human oocyte and its follicle. I. Ultrastructural and histochemical observations on the primordial follicle stage. J Cell Biol 34: 647–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta PM, Makabe S, Naguro T, Corner S (1994) Oocyte follicle cells association during development of human ovarian follicle. A study by high resolution scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Arch Histol Cytol 57: 369–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Plancha CE, Albertini DF (1994) Hormonal regulation of meiotic maturation in the hamster oocyte involves a cytoskeleton-mediated process. Biol Re-prod 51: 852–864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki H, Jeong BS, Yang X (2000) Dynamic changes of cumulus-oocyte cell communication during in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes. Biol Reprod 63: 723–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tesarik J, Dvorak M (1982) Human cumulus oophorus preovulatory development. J Ultrastruct Res 78: 60–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace RA, Selman K (1990) Ultrastructural aspects of oogenesis and oocyte growth in fish and amphibians. J Electron Microsc Tech 16: 175–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Albertini, D.F. (2002). The Structural Basis of Oocyte-Granulosa Cell Communication. In: Eppig, J., Hegele-Hartung, C., Lessl, M. (eds) The Future of the Oocyte. Ernst Schering Research Foundation Workshop, vol 41. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04960-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04960-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-04962-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04960-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics