Skip to main content

Classical Statistical Mechanics

  • Chapter
Statistical Mechanics

Part of the book series: Texts and Monographs in Physics ((TMP))

Abstract

Statistical mechanics poses the problem of deducing macroscopic properties of matter from the atomic hypothesis. According to the hypothesis matter consists of atoms or molecules that move subject to the laws of classical mechanics or of quantum mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N = 6.02 x 1023 particles per mole = “Avogadro’s number”: this implies, for instance, that 1 cm3 of hydrogen, or of any other (perfect) gas, at normal conditions (1 atm at 0°C) contains about 2.7 x 1019 molecules.

    Google Scholar 

  2. At least in the thermodynamic limit, see (1.5.6), in which the volume becomes infinite but the average density and energy per particle stay fixed.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Which it is worth stressing once more does not depend on the microscopic dynamics.

    Google Scholar 

  4. later, one finds k B = 1.38-16 erg K-1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mainly it simplifies the relation between T and (3 in the first of (1.6.8) below.

    Google Scholar 

  6. i. e. a thermodynamics that does not come into conflict with the basic principles, expressed by (1.6.5).

    Google Scholar 

  7. One should not think that it is difficult to devise ensembles which are orthodic and which may seem “not reasonable” (for a thermodynamic interpretation) : in fact Boltzmann’s paper, [Bo84], on the ensembles starts with such an example involving the motion of one of Saturn’s rings regarded as a massive line (in a parallel paper the example was the Moon, whose orbit was replaced by an ellipse of mass such that each arc contained an amount of mass proportional to the time spent on it by the Moon). This may have been one of the reasons this fundamental paper has been overlooked for so many years. Such “unphysical” examples come from Helmholtz, [He95a], [He95b], and played an important role for Boltzmann (who was considering them in a less systematic way even much earlier, [Bo66]). In fact if one can define the mechanical analogue of thermodynamics for any system, small or large, then it is natural to think that in large systems the average quantities will also satisfy the second law. And the idea (of Boltzmann) that the macroscopic observables have the same value on most of the energy surface makes the law easily observable in large systems, while this may not be the case in very small systems. In other words the one-degree-of-freedom examples are not at all unphysical; rather the contrary holds: see Appendix 1.A1 (to Chap. 1) for Helmholtz’s theory and Chap. 9 for a recent application of the same viewpoint.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Note that if one throws hard spheres randomly and independently in a box then some of them may overlap. It is convenient not to exclude such a possibility provided one disregards completely the interaction of the overlapping spheres as long as they overlap and starts considering it only after they separate because of the motion: this is clearly a trick that introduces some minor simplification of the discussion while not affecting the macroscopic properties of the (rarefied) gas.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Readers might be interested in the referee’s report to one of my papers, [Ga95a], as it shows, in my opinion, how blind to evidence an historian of science can be at times. The contents of the paper in question are reproduced here; the referee’s report and the corresponding unamended original version can be found in [Ga95b] (in English).

    Google Scholar 

  10. It is important, in this respect, to be aware that Boltzmann had studied the Greek language and, by his own account, quite well: see [Bo74], p. 133, to the point of having known at least small parts of Homer by heart. Hence there should be no doubt that he did distinguish the meanings of εεδoς, and ὁδóς which are among the most common words.

    Google Scholar 

  11. In checking my understanding of the original paper as partially discussed in [Ga81], I have profited from an English translation that Dr. J. Renn kindly provided me with later, (1984). He noticed this footnote in [Bo84] while performing his translation, (unfortunately still unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gallavotti, G. (1999). Classical Statistical Mechanics. In: Statistical Mechanics. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03952-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03952-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08438-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03952-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics