Abstract
Analyses pertaining to “Democracy and the European Union” may be more or less comprehensive: the purpose may be to gain a better understanding of some specific aspects of the organisation or its practices; or it may be to attain a better general understanding and characterisation. In either case both theoretical, normative and political interests may be operative. In the case of a more specific focus, the inquiry may, e.g., be due to an interest in developing more satisfactory indices of power, i.e., a better theory of power. As to normative and political interests, the inquiry may be due to a wish to improve the organisation on points where improvements are possible and important, or the aim may be to get a better basis for advising non-members on the question of joining, or not joining, the organisation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristotle: The Politics of Aristotle (Translated with an introduction, notes and appendixes by Ernest Barker), New York/London (Oxford University Press) 1946.
Dahl, R. A.: “Federalism and the Democratic Process”, Nomos XXV, (1983) pp. 95–108 (= Pennock, J. R. & J.W. Chapman (Eds.): Liberal Democracy, N.Y. & London (New York University Press) 1983.
Dahl, R. A.: Democracy and Its Critics, New Haven (Yale University Press) 1989
Gustavsson, S: “Defending the Democratic Deficit”, in: A. Weale and N. Nentwich (Eds.): The Political Theory of European Constitutional Choice, London (Routledge) 1997, forthcoming.
Gustavsson, S. & L. Lewin (Eds.): The Future of the Nation-State: Essays on Cultural Pluralism and Political Integration, Stockholm (Nerenius & Santérus Publishers/Routledge) 1996.
Kant, I.: Kant’s Political Writings, Edited with an Introduction and Notes by Hans Reiss. Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 1970.
Kymlicka, W.: Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford (Clarendon Press) 1995.
Lijphart, A.: Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven and London (Yale University Press) 1984.
Lively, J.: Democracy, Oxford/New York (Basil Blackwell) 1984.
Pogge, T.W.: Realizing Rawls, Ithaca/London (Cornell University Press) 1989.
Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice, London (Oxford University Press) 1971.
Riker, W.: Liberalism against Populism, San Francisco (Freeman) 1982.
Rousseau, J. J.: Du contrat social, Oxford (Clarendon Press) 1752/1972. Cf. E. Barker (Ed.): Social Contract: Essays by Locke, Hume, and Rousseau, New York and London (Oxford University Press) 1960.
Schmitter, P. C. (1996a): “If the Nation-State Were to Wither Away in Europe, What Might Replace It?”, in: S. Gustavsson & L. Lewin (Eds.) 1996.
Schmitter, P.C. (1996b): Is it really possible to democratize the Euro-Polity?, (Unpublished manuscript) Stanford (Stanford University) 1996.
Smith, E. (Ed.): National Parliaments as Cornerstones of European Integration, London, The Hague, Boston (Kluwer Law International) 1996.
Weiler, J. H. H.: “Legitimacy and Democracy of Union Governance: The 1996 Intergovernmental Agenda and Beyond”, ARENA Working Paper, No. 22, November 1996.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Midgaard, K. (1998). The Problem of Autonomy and Democracy in a Complex Polity: the European Union. In: Føllesdal, A., Koslowski, P. (eds) Democracy and the European Union. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03622-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03622-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08333-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03622-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive