Skip to main content

Organizational Actors and the Need for a Flexible World Representation

  • Conference paper
Simulating Social Phenomena

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 456))

Abstract

In a social situation actors need to cooperate in order to achieve their goals. Instead of using a fixed collection of rules to model social knowledge this paper investigates the process of dynamic acquiring and developing social knowledge by actors. Based on the Soar architecture actors develop a world representation that encompasses models of other actors and preferable action patterns for social cooperation. The multiactor virtual experiment shows the feasibility of this approach and demonstrates the emergence of collaboration deadlocks and the role world representation plays in solving these deadlocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carley, K., and M. Prietula (1994), ACTS theory: extending the model of bounded rationality. In: Carley, k., and M. Prietula (eds.) Computational organization theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. M. and A. Newell (1994) The Nature of the Social Actor. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 19(4), 221 - 262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D. (1992), When can two heads learn better than one? Results from a computer model of organizational learning. In: M. Masuch M. Warglien (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Organization and Management Theory: Models of Distributed Activity. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R. G. Castelfranchi. (1995) Cognitive and social action. London: UCL Press Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, J.E., A. Newell, P.S. Rosenbloom. (1987) Soar: An Architecture for General Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33, 1 - 64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. S., H. A. Simon (1958/1994) Organizations [Second Edition]. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. (1991) Cooperative Work: A Conceptual Framework. In J. Rasmussen, B. Brehmer, J. Leplat (eds.) Distributed decision making, cognitive models for cooperative work. Wiley Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Stuart, Peter Norvig. (1995) Artificial Intelligence: A modern approach Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van den Broek, H., Gazendam, H.W.M. (1997). Organizational Actors and the Need for a Flexible World Representation. In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R., Terna, P. (eds) Simulating Social Phenomena. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 456. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03366-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03366-1_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63329-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03366-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics