Zusammenfassung
The encounters between feminism and psychology have taken various forms. Previously, I have structured these encounters in terms of a tripartite framework: feminism and/in/as psychology (Rutherford & Pettit, 2015). “Feminism and psychology” refers to the relationship between a political/cultural movement and a scientific discipline, and highlights the efforts of participants in each to problematize, or distance from, the other. “Feminism in psychology” refers to the critiques of psychology from within, foregrounding the interventions of self-identified feminists in psychology and their attempts to alter its methods, epistemologies, theories, and practices. Finally, “feminism as psychology/psychology as feminism” explores the conceptual and cultural linkages and elisions between the two, or the ways in which feminism has become psychologized, and psychology has absorbed feminist critique into its “business as usual.” In this chapter, I explore the encounters between feminism and P/psychology by asking the questions: How, where, in what forms, and with what consequences have feminism and P/psychology related to one another? Under what intellectual, cultural, economic, and political conditions have they parted ways, emulsified, or made common cause, and to what intellectual and material effects? I use three United-States-based case studies spanning the 1950s to the present, that exemplify the porous boundaries of P/psychology, highlighting the non-academic, non-disciplinary territories where feminism and P/psychology have come together in diverse ways. I conclude that only by attending to these diverse territories can we account for and understand the ubiquity, appeal, and influence of psychological thinking in society, and unpack the influence of feminism and psychology on gender ideologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Ash, M. (2007). Psychological thought and practice: Historical and interdisciplinary perspectives. In M. Ash & T. Sturm (Eds.), Psychology’s Territories: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives from Different Disciplines (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Backhouse, R. E., & Fontaine, P. (Eds.) (2010). The History of the Social Sciences since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Becker, D. (2005). The Myth of Empowerment: Women and the Therapeutic Culture in America. New York: New York University Press.
Breines, W. (1986). The 1950s: Gender and some social science. Sociological Inquiry, 56, 69–92.
Brothers, J. (1961). Woman. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday & Company.
Brothers, J. (1972). The Brothers System for Liberated Love and Marriage. New York: Avon Books.
Brothers, J. (1992). Widowed. New York: Ballantine.
Cherry, F. (2001). Towards a re-writing of the history of social psychology: An unintended contribution by Marie Jahoda and Joan (Havel) Grant. History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin, 13(1), 19–24.
Collins, K. (2016). Dr. Joyce Brothers: The Founding Mother of TV Psychology. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Cook, S. W. (1990). Marie Jahoda (1907–). In A. N. O’Connell & N. Russo (Eds.), Women in Psychology: A Bio-bibliographic Sourcebook (pp. 207–219). New York: Greenwood Press.
Crawford, M. (1998). The reciprocity of psychology and popular culture. In E. Burman (Ed.), Deconstructing Feminist Psychology (pp. 61–89). London: Sage.
Eagly, A. H., Eaton, A., Rose, S. M., Riger, S., & McHugh, M. C. (2012). Feminism and psychology: Analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67(3), 211–230.
Eagly, A., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69, 685–702.
Eisenmann, L. (2006). Higher Education for Women in Postwar America, 1945–1965. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Heinze, A. R. (2004). Jews and the American Soul: Human Nature in the 20th Century. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Herman, E. (1993). The Romance of American Psychology: Political Culture in the Age of Experts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jahoda, M., & Havel, J. (1955, October). Psychological problems of women in different social roles. The Educational Record, 325–335.
Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Zeisel, H. (1933/1971). Marienthal: A Sociography of an Unemployed Community. London: Tavistock.
Johnston, E., & Johnson, A. (2008). Searching for the second generation of American women psychologists. History of Psychology, 11, 40–69.
Jordan-Young, R. M. (2011). Brainstorm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Held, L., & Rutherford, A. (2012). Can’t a mother sing the blues? Postpartum depression and the construction of motherhood in late 20th-century America. History of Psychology, 15, 107–123.
Kim, S., & Rutherford, A. (2015). From seduction to sexism: Feminists challenge the ethics of therapist-client sexual relations in 1970s America. History of Psychology, 18, 283–296.
Koffman, O., & Gill, R. (2013). ‘The revolution will be led by a 12-year-old girl’: Girl power and global biopolitics. Feminist Review, 105, 83–102.
Locher, F. (1975). Brothers, Joyce. Contemporary Authors, New Revision Series, vol. 13, pp. 75–76.
McRobbie, A. (2009). The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture, and Social Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Murphy, M. (2017). The Economization of Life. Durham, NC, London: Duke University Press.
Riger, S. (1993). What’s wrong with empowerment? American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279–292.
Riordan, E. (2001). Commodified agents and empowered girls: Consuming and producing feminism. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 25, 279–297.
Ruck, N. (2016). Controversies on evolutionism: On the construction of scientific boundaries in public and internal scientific controversies about evolutionary psychology and sociobiology. Theory & Psychology, 26, 1–16.
Rutherford, A. (2017a). “Making better use of U.S. women”: Psychology, sex roles, and womanpower in post-WWII America. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 53, 228–245.
Rutherford, A. (2017b). Surveying rape: Feminist social science and the ontological politics of sexual assault. History of the Human Sciences, 30(4), 100–123.
Rutherford, A. (2018a). Acknowledging rape: What the origins of the “1 in 5” statistic can teach us about sexual assault policy. The Behavioral Scientist, Special Issue “Nudge Turns 10”. Retrieved from http://behavioralscientist.org/what-the-origins-of-the-1-in-5-statistic-teachesus-about-sexual-assault-policy/.
Rutherford. A. (2018). Feminism, psychology and the gendering of neoliberal subjectivity: From critique to disruption. Theory & Psychology, 28, 619–644.
Rutherford, A., & Granek, L. (2010). Emergence and development of the psychology of women. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology, vol. 1 (pp. 19–41). New York: Springer.
Rutherford, A., Marecek, J., & Sheese, K. (2012). Psychology of women and gender. In D. K. Freedheim & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology, vol. 1: History of Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 279–301). New York: Wiley.
Rutherford, A., & Pettit, M. (2015). Feminism and/in/as psychology: The public sciences of sex and gender. History of Psychology, 18(3), 223–237.
Rutherford, A., Unger, R. K., & Cherry, F. C. (2011). Reclaiming SPSSI’s sociological past: Marie Jahoda and the immersion tradition in social psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 67(1), 41–56.
Solovey, M., & Craven, H. (2012). Cold War Social Science: Knowledge Production, Liberal Democracy, and Human Nature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Squire, C. (1989). Significant Differences: Feminism in Psychology. London: Routledge.
Vicedo, M. (2013). The Nature and Nurture of Love: From Imprinting to Attachment in Cold War America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rutherford, A. (2020). Encounters between feminism and psychology: Territories of critique and collusion. In: Balz, V., Malich, L. (eds) Psychologie und Kritik. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29486-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29486-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29485-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29486-1
eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)