Skip to main content

Rethinking Bodies and Objects in Social Interaction: A Multimodal and Multisensorial Approach to Tasting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Discussing New Materialism

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the contributions of ethnomethodology and multimodal conversation analysis to current debates about materiality, including both bodies and objects as they are mobilized, made accountable, seen and interpreted by participants within social interaction. Video studies have enabled a new detailed analytical gaze on multimodality – including language, the body, and the manipulation of objects. In this chapter, I show that multimodality can be farther developed by taking into account how sensoriality is intersubjectively achieved in social interaction. The chapter discusses the conceptual, analytical, and methodological challenges that this constitutes for the approach of materialities in human action. Using the video recording of a tasting session as an exemplary empirical case, the analysis shows how participants orchestrate their bodies as both communicating bodies and sensing bodies. Moreover, it shows how the multimodally organized activity of tasting manipulates different types of objects, materials to be tasted, and artifacts supporting tasting. Taking into account not only the multimodality of interactional exchanges (in which embodied and linguistic resources secure a form of intersubjectivity based on the mutual understanding of the participants), but also their multisensoriality (in which the bodies access, feel, and experience the world) invites thinking about a different form of intersubjectivity, in which bodies sense other bodies sensing, and align with other objects within various spatial and material configurations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter. A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buscher, Monika. 2004. Social life under the microscope? Sociological Research Online, 10(2), <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/2/b_scher.html>. Downloaded on June 21, 2018.

  • Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension, Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen, Constance. 1993. Worlds of sense: Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D., and S. Frost, eds. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham: Duke UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csordas, T. J. 2008. Intersubjectivity and intercorporeality. Subjectivity 22: 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D., and J. Wagner. 2015. Objects as tools for talk. In Interacting with objects. Language, materiality and social activity, eds. M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, and M. Rauniomaa, p. 101–124. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Stefani, Elwys. 2015. Establishing joint attention towards commercial objects in self-service stores. In Interacting with objects. Language, materiality and social activity, eds. Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa. Amsterdam: Benjamins, p. 275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egbert, M., and A. Deppermann, eds. 2012. Hearing aids communication, Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fele, G. 2016. Il paradosso del gusto. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 7 (14): 151–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkers, Andreas. 2013. Was ist neu am neuen Materialismus? In Critical Matter. Diskussionen eines neuen Materialismus, eds. Tobias Goll, Daniel Keil, Thomas Telios. Münster: assemblage, p. 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles. 1981. Conversational Organization. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. 1994. Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96 (3): 606–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. 1999. Practices of color classification. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7 (1–2): 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles. 2000. Practices of seeing: Visual analysis. In Handbook of Visual Analysis, eds. Theo van Leeuwen, and Carey Jewitt, p. 157–182. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddington, P., L. Mondada, and M. Nevile, eds. 2013. Interaction and mobility. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Christian. 1986. Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Christian. 2012. The Dynamics of Auction. Social Interaction and the Sale of Fine Art and Antiques. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., and D. vom Lehn 2004. Configuring Reception: (Dis-) Regarding the ‘Spectator’ in Museums and Galleries. Theory, Culture & Society 21: 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Christian, and P. Luff 2000. Technology in action. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Christian, J. Hindmarsh, and P. Luff 2010. Video in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer, Stefan. 2004. Praktiken und ihre Körper. Über materielle Partizipanden des Tuns. In Doing Culture. Zum Begriff der Praxis in der gegenwärtigen soziologischen Theorie, eds. Karl H. Hörning and Julia Reuter, p. 73–91. Bielefeld: Transkript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, Gail. 2017. Talking About Troubles in Conversation. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, Richard, and B. Treanor 2015. Carnal Hermeneutics, Fordham UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, M. 2005. Gaze as Social Control: How Very Young Children Differentiate “The Look” From a “Mere Look” by Their Adult Caregivers. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38 (4): 417–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, Activity, 3–4: 228–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, Kenneth (2013). More Studies in Ethnomethodology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C., J. Streeck, J. Scott Jordan, eds. 2017. Intercorporeality. Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, Annemarie. 2003. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, Lorenza. 2006a. Video recording as the reflexive preservation-configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In Video Analysis, eds. Hubert Knoblauch, Jürgen Raab, Hans-Georg Soeffner and Bernt Schnettler, p. 51–67. Bern: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. 2006b. Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8: 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. 2007. Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9 (2): 195–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. 2009. Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics. 41: 1977–1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, Lorenza. 2011. The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In Embodied Interaction, Language and Body in the Material World, eds. Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin and Curtis LeBaron, p. 207–226. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. 2014a. The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 65: 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, Lorenza 2014b. Pointing, talk and the bodies: Reference and joint attention as embodied interactional achievements. In From gesture in conversation to visible utterance in action, eds. Mandana Seyfeddinipur and Marianne Gullberg, p. 95–124. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. 2016. Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20 (2): 2–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. 2018a. Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction. Challenges for transcribing multimodality. ROLSI, 51:1: 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, Lorenza, 2018b. Visual practices: video studies, multimodality and multisensoriality. In Co-operative Engagements in Intertwined Semiosis: Essays in Honour of Charles Goodwin, ed. Donald Favareau, p. 304–325. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevile, M. 2015. The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction, ROLSI, 48:2: 121–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevile, M., P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, and M. Rauniomaa, eds. 2015. Interacting with objects. Language, materiality and social activity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. 2002. Towards a theory of social practice: A development in cultural theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5 (2): 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., and T. Stivers. 2001. Achieving activity transitions in primary-care encounters: From history taking to physical examination. Human Communication Research, 27 (2): 253–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossano, Federico. 2012. Gaze in conversation. In The handbook of conversation analysis, eds. Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, p. 308–329. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, Theodore R. 1996 Social Practices. A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, Emanuel Abraham. 1984. On some gestures’ relation to talk. In Structures of social action, eds. J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Lawrence. 2011, Embodied Cognition. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2009. The Corporeal turn. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudnow, David. 1972. Temporal parameters of interpersonal observation. In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. David Sudnow, p. 259–279. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, Nigel. 2007. Non-representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Stephen. 1994 The Social Theory of Practices. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannini, P. ed. 2015. Non-Representational Methodologies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. 2002. Talking with your mouth full: Gustatory mmms and the embodiment of pleasure. ROLSI, 35:3: 311–336.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenza Mondada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mondada, L. (2019). Rethinking Bodies and Objects in Social Interaction: A Multimodal and Multisensorial Approach to Tasting. In: Kissmann, U., van Loon, J. (eds) Discussing New Materialism. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22300-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22300-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22299-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22300-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics