Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ansatzpunkte der Digitalisierung im Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mobilität und digitale Transformation

  • 18k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Digitalisierung bezeichnet die Nutzung großer Datenmengen, die zu einer umfassenden Vernetzung aller Bereiche der Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft führen wird (BMWi, 2015 und ähnlich Köhler/Wollschläger, 2014: 79). Sie umfasst die Erhebung von analogen Informationen („Big Data“ in einem engen Sinne; z.B. O´Leary, 2013), ihre Speicherung in einem digitaltechnischen System (lokale Speicherung oder „Cloud Computing“ durch die Weiterentwickelung des Internets; z.B. Hashem et al., 2015: 101), die Analyse und Interpretation sowie den Transfer in andere Systeme („Internet der Dinge“ bzw. „Internet of Things“; z.B. Ashton, 2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • [1] Aaker, D.A. (2013): Strategisches Markt-Management. 10th ed.. John Wiley & Son.: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • [2] Abdelkafi, N./Makhotin, S./Posselt, T. (2013): Business model innovations for electric mobility. What can be learned from existing business model patterns? In: International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1): 1-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • [3] Abernathy, W.J./Utterback, J.M. (1978): Patterns of industrial innovation. In: Technology Re-view, 80(7): 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • [4] Ackermann, R. (2001): Pfadabhängigkeit, Institutionen und Regelreform. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • [5] Ambrosini, V./Bowman, C./Collier, N. (2009): Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. In: British Journal of Management, 20: 9-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • [6] Anderson, P./Tushman, M.L. (1990): Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. In: Adminstrative Science Quarterly 35(4): 604-633.

    Google Scholar 

  • [7] Arend, R.J./Bromiley, P. (2009): Assessing the dynamic capability view: Spare change, everyone? In: Strategic Organization, 7: 75.90.

    Google Scholar 

  • [8] Argyris, C./Schön, D.A. (1978): Organizational learning. A theory of action perspective. Reading/Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • [9] Ashton, K. (2009): That `Internet of Things´ thing. In the real world things matter more than ideas. RFID (radio frequency identification) Journal. Online abrufbar unter http://www.rfidjournal.com/articles/view?4986 (abgerufen am 28.3.2017).

  • [10] Baden-Fuller, C./Mangematin, V. (2013): Business models: A challenging agenda. In: Strategic Organization, 11(4): 418-427.

    Google Scholar 

  • [11] Baker, M. (2015): Digital transformation: Strategy | Technology | Digital | Operations. 4. ed. Buckingham, UK: Buckingham Business Monographs.

    Google Scholar 

  • [12] Basil, D.C./Cook, C.W. (1974): The management of change. London 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • [13] BCG (Boston Consulting Group) (Hrsg.) (2016): What´s ahead for car sharing?: The New Mobility and Its Impact on Vehicle Sales. Ohne Ortsangabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • [14] Blaikie, N.W.H. (1991). A critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Quality and Quantity, 25(2), 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • [15] BMWi (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie) (2015): Monitoring Report Diigital 2015. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • [16] Bourgeois, L.J./Eisenhardt, K.M. (1988): Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. In: Management Science, 37 (7): 816-835.

    Google Scholar 

  • [17] Bucherer, E./Eisert, U./Gassmann, O. (2012): Towards systematic business model innovation: Lessons from product innovation management. In: Creativity and Innovation Management, 21: 183-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • [18] BVDW (Bundesverband Digitale Wirtschaft e.V.) (2015): Diskussionspapier Connected Cars: Geschäftsmodelle. Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • [19] Casadesus-Masanell, R./Ricart, J.E. (2010): From strategy to business models and onto tactics. In: Long Range Planning, 43(2-3): 195-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • [20] Collis, D.J. (1994): How valuable are organizational capabilities? In: Strategic Management Journal, 15 (S1): 143-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • [21] D´Aveni, R.A. (1995): Hyperwettbewerb. Strategien für die neue Dynamik der Märkte. Wiesbaden 1995 (= Hypercompetition, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • [22] David, P.A. (1985): Clio and the economics of QWERTY. In: The American Economic Review, 74 (2): 332-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • [23] Davis, J.P./Eisenhardt, K.M./Bingham, C.B. (2009): Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 413-452.

    Google Scholar 

  • [24] Diekmann, A. (2008): Empirische Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen. (19. Auflage). Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • [25] Dresing, T./Pehl, T. (2011): Praxisbuch Transkription: Regelsysteme, Software und praktische Anleitung für qualitative ForscherInnen. Marburg: Eigenverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • [26] Easterby-Smith, M./Prieto, I.M. (2008): Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management: An integrative role for learning? In: British Journal of Management, 19 (3): 235-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • [27] Easterby-Smith, M./Lyles, M./Peteraf, M. (2009): Dynamic capabilities: Current debates and future directions. In: British Journal of Management, 20: S1-S8.

    Google Scholar 

  • [28] Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989): Building theories from case study research. In: The Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • [29] Foss, N./Sabi, T. (2017): Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? In. Journal of Management, 43(1): 200-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • [30] Frankenberger, K./Weiblein, T./Csik, M./Gassmann, O. (2013): The 4l-framework of business model innovation: An analysis of the process phases and challenges. Working paper, Institute of Technology Management, University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • [31] Gersch, M./Goeke, C. (2007): Industry transformation – Conceptual considerations from an evoltionary perspective. In: Journal of Business Market Management, 1 (2): 151-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • [32] Hamidian, K./Kraijo, C. (2013): Digitalisierung: Status Quo. In: Keuper, F./Hamidian, K./Ver-waayen, E./Kalinowski, T./Kraijo, C. (Hrsg.): Digitalisierung und Innovation. Planung - Entstehung - Entwicklungsperspektiven. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • [33] Hashem, I.A.T./Yacoob, I./Anuar, N.B./Mokhtar, S./Gani, A./Ullah Khan, S. (2015): The rise of „big data“ on cloud computing. Review and open research issues. In: Information Systems, 47: 98-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • [34] Helfat, C.E./Raubitschek, R. (2000): Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10-11): 961-979.

    Google Scholar 

  • [35] Helfat, C./Winter, S.G. (2011): Untangling dynamic und operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever changing world. In: Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1243-1250.

    Google Scholar 

  • [36] Henderson, R.M./Clark, K.B. (1990): Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product Ttchnologies and the failure of established firms. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 9-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • [37] Hill, C.W./Rothaermel, F.T. (2003): The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. In: The Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • [38] Jacobides, M.G./MacDuffie, J.P. (2013): How to drive value your way. In: Harvard Business Review, 91(7), 92-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • [39] Jacobides, M.G./Knudsen, T./Augier, M. (2006): Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. In: Research Policy, 35: 1200-1221.

    Google Scholar 

  • [40] Johnson, M./Cristensen, C./Kargermann, H. (2008): Reinventing your business model. In: Harvard Business Review, 86(12): 50-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • [41] Kane, G.C./Palmer, D./Phillips, A.N./Kiron, D./Buckley, N. (2016): Aligning the organization for its digital future. Findings from the 2016 Digital Business Global Executive Study and Research Project (= MIT Sloan Management Review Research Report in collaboration with Deloitte University Press). MIT: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • [42] Kerin, R.A./Varadarajan, P.R./Peterson, R.A. ( 1992): First mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. In: Journal of Marketing, 56: 33-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • [43] Khanagha, S./Volberda, H./Oshri, I. (2014): Business model renewal and ambidexterity: Structural aliteration and strategy formulation process during transition to a cloud business model. In: R&D Management, 44(3): 322-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • [44] Klein, B.H. (1977): Dynamic ecomomics. Cambridge/Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • [45] Köhler, T.R./Wollschläger, D. (2014): Die digitale Transformation des Automobils: 5 Mega-Trends verändern die Branche. Pattersen: Media-Manufaktur GmbH.Karimi, J./Walter, Z. (2015): The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital dis-ruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry, In: Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 39-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • [46] Langerak, F. (2005): The impact of new products development acceleration approaches on speed and profitability: Lessons for pioneers and fast followers. In: Engineering Management, 52: 30-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • [47] Lawrence, P.R./Lorsch, J.W. (1967): Differantiation and integration in complex organisations. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 1.47.

    Google Scholar 

  • [48] Liesenkötter, B./ Schewe, G. (2014): E-Mobility: Zum Sailing-Ship-Effect in der Automobilindustrie. Wiesbaden: SpringerGabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • [49] Lindgarth, Z./Reeves, M./Stalk, G./Deimler, M. (2009): Business model innovation: When the game gets tough change the game. The Boston Consulting Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • [50] Linz, C./Müller-Stewens, G./Zimmermann, A. (2017): Radical rusiness model transformamation: Gaining the competitive edge in a disruptive world. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • [51] Lusch, R./Nambisan, R. (2015): Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. In: MIS Quarterly, 39 (1): 155-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • [52] March, J.G./Olsen, J.P. (1976): Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • [53] Markides, C.C. (2015): Research on business models: Challenges and opportunities. In: Baden-Fuller,C./Mangematin, V. (eds.): Business models and modelling: 133 - 147 (Advances in Strategic Management, Volume 33: Emerald Group Publishing Limited).

    Google Scholar 

  • [54] McKinsey&Company (2016). Automotive revolution - perspective towards 2030: How the convergence of disruptive technology-driven trends could transform the auto industry. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • [55] Meier, A./Slembeck, T. (1994): Wirtschaftspolitik. Ein kognitiv-evolutionärer Ansatz. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • [56] Mitchell, D./Coles, C. (2003): The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation. In: Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5): 15-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • [57] O´Leary, D.E. (2013): Big Datas, the internet of things and the internet of signs. In: Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 20: 53-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • [58] Osterwalder, A./Pigneur, Y. (2002) “An e-buiness model ontology for modeling e-business”. Lausanne. (= Paper presented at the 15th Electronic Commerce Conference, Bled, Slovenia, June 17 -19, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • [59] Peteraf, M.A./Di Stefano, G./Verona, G. (2013) The elephant in the room of dynamic capabi-lities: Bringing two diverging conversations together. In: Strategic Management Jour-nal, 34(12): 1389-1410.

    Google Scholar 

  • [60] Porter, M. E. (1985): Competitive advantage. Creating and sustaining superior performance, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • [61] Porter, M.E., Heppelmann, J.E. (2014): How smart, connected products are transforming competition. In: Harvard Business Review, 92(11): 64-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • [62] Proff, H. (2002): Konsistente Gesamtunternehmensstrategien zwischen Markt- und Ressourcenorientierung. Wiesbaden (Gabler).

    Google Scholar 

  • [63] Proff, H./Jung, B./Sommer, K.C./Fojcik, T.M. (2014): Developing business models in times of long-term far-reaching technological change - A competence-based perspective. In: Journal of Competence-based Strategic Management, 7: 35-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • [64] Proff, H.V. (2004): Neue Ansätze der Wirtschaftspolitik in offenen, dezentralen Volkswirtschaften. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • [65] Reischauer, G./Leitner, K.-H. (2016): Innovation 4.0: Wie das Innovationspotenzial von Industrie 4.0 analysiert werden kann. In: Austrian Management Review, 6: 76-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • [66] Rogers, D.L. (2016): The digital transformation playbook. Rethink your business for thedigital age. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • [67] Roland Berger (Hrsg.) (2015): Die digitale Transformation der Industrie: Was sie bedeutet. Wer gewinnt. Was jetzt zu tun ist. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • [68] Rothaermel, F.T./Deeds, D.L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. In: Strategic Management Journal, 25 (3): 201-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • [69] Schallmo, D. (2013): Geschäftsmodell-Innovation: Grundlagen, bestehende Ansätze, methodisches Vorgehen und B2B Geschäftsmodelle, Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • [70] Schmidt, A. (2015): Überlegene Geschäftsmodelle. Wertgenese und Wertabschöpfung in turbulenten Umwelten. Wiesbaden: SpringerGabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • [71] Schneckenberg, D., Spieth, P. (2016): Theorising business model innovation: Mapping research dimensions and positions in an integrative framework. Paris: Paper auf der EURAM 2016 Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • [72] Schumpeter, J.A. (1912): Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmensgewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. Leipzig. (= Nachdruck der 1. Auflage von 1912 aus dem Jahr 2006. Hrsg. u. erg. um eine Einführung von J. Röpke und O. Stiller. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • [73] Sedran, T./Gissler, A. (2015): Wie die Autoindustrie die Chancen der Digitalisierung richtig nutzt: Wertschöpfungspotenzial in Milliardenhöhe wird die Branche verändern. (= Sonderbeilage der Automobilwoche der Accenture GmbH: 1 + 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • [74] Skảlén, P./Gummers, J./Koskull, C./Magnusson, P.R. (2015): Exploring value propositions and service innovation: A service-dominant logic study. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Vol. 43 (2), S.137-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • [75] Stähler, P. (2002): Geschäftsmodelle in der digitalen Ökonomie. 2. Aufl., Köln: Josef EUL Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • [76] Teece, D. (2007): Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sus-tainable) enterprise performance. In: Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1319-1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • [77] Teece, D.J. (2010): Business models, business strategy and innovation. In: Long Range Planning, 43(2/3): 172-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • [78] Teece, D.J. (2014): A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. In: Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (1): 8–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • [79] Teece, D.J./Pisano, G./Shuen, A. (1997): Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In: Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • [80] Tripsas, M./Gavetti, G. (2000): Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11): 1147-1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • [81] Utterback, J.M./Abernathy, W.J. (1975): A Dynamic Model of Product and Process Innovation. In: Omega 3(6): 639-656.

    Google Scholar 

  • [82] Vargo, S.L./Lusch, R.F. (2008): Service-dominant logic continuing the evolution. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (1), S. 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • [83] Wedeniwski, S. (2015): Mobilitätsrevolution in der Automobilindustrie: Letzte Ausfahrt digital! Berlin: Springer Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • [84] Winter, S. G./Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. In: Organization Science, 12: 730-743.

    Google Scholar 

  • [85] Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. (Fifth Edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • [86] Yoo, Y./Boland Jr., R./Lyytinen, K./Majchrzak, A. (2012): Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. In: Organization Science, 23(5): 1398–1408.

    Google Scholar 

  • [87] Zollo, M./Winter, S.G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. In: Orgnization Science, 13 (3): 339-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • [88] Utterback, J.M./Abernathy, W.J. (1975): A dynamic model of product and process innovation. In: Omega 3(6): 639-656.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für ABWL, MF 424a, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Deutschland

    Heike Proff

  2. Lehrstuhl für ABWL & Internationales Aut, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Deutschland

    Thomas Martin Fojcik

Authors
  1. Heike Proff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Martin Fojcik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heike Proff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für ABWL, MF 424a, Universität Duisburg-Essen , Duisburg, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Heike Proff

  2. Lehrstuhl für ABWL & Internationales Aut, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    Thomas Martin Fojcik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Proff, H., Fojcik, T.M. (2018). Ansatzpunkte der Digitalisierung im Management. In: Proff, H., Fojcik, T. (eds) Mobilität und digitale Transformation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20779-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20779-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-20778-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-20779-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation